Administrative ProvisionsTransportation Design-build Program
Section § 6820
This section outlines key definitions used in the chapter. "Best value" refers to evaluating offers based on several factors, not just price. The "design-build" process involves one entity handling both the design and construction of a project. "Design-build entity" and "team" indicate the group capable of providing necessary services for such projects. The "Department" is the state's Department of Transportation. "Expressway" is as defined in another code, and interfacing with the highway involves work related to state highway property. Regional transportation agencies can be several types of local or state entities responsible for managing transportation projects. "Transportation entity" encompasses both the Department of Transportation and regional agencies.
Section § 6821
This law allows the department to use the design-build method for up to 10 highway projects, with more allowed in the following two fiscal years. This method can be based on either the best value or the lowest responsible bid. Regional transportation agencies can also use this method for projects on or near highways but must make agreements with the department for roles, responsibilities, and issue resolution. For expressways not on the state highway system, the design-build method can be used if voters approved the projects by 2014. However, cities and counties cannot use design-build procurement under this law.
Construction inspection must follow another section of the code and is not included in this authority. Reports on project progress and compliance are required annually starting two years after a contract award and stop four years after the first report. These reports must follow specific Government Code requirements.
Section § 6822
This law requires the commission to use specific guidelines to create a conflict-of-interest policy. This policy dictates that anyone who helps a transportation entity plan a design-build project cannot also bid on that project as a contractor or join a team bidding on it. This is to ensure fairness in design-build contracts.
Section § 6823
This law talks about how certain public works projects in California should handle labor compliance. If a transportation project using the design-build method was awarded before January 1, 2012, they must either set up their own labor compliance program or work with a third party to do so, following rules from another law (Section 1771.5 of the Labor Code). However, if there's already a collective bargaining agreement covering all contractors, this requirement doesn't apply. For projects started on or after January 1, 2012, they need to follow different labor compliance rules laid out in Section 1771.4 of the Labor Code.
Section § 6824
This law outlines the steps a transportation entity in California should follow when undertaking a design-build project. It starts with the preparation of detailed documents describing the project's scope, estimated cost, and specifications, which must be done by a licensed design professional.
The next step is issuing a Request for Proposals (RFP) based on these initial documents. The RFP must define the project's needs, evaluation methodology, and significant factors like cost and design requirements. The law also allows for discussions and negotiations with potential bidders in some cases.
The transportation entity must also issue a Request for Qualifications (RFQ). This helps prequalify the design-build entities, assessing their experience, technical skills, financial stability, and any past legal issues.
Finally, the law describes how contracts can be awarded either through the lowest responsible bidder or based on the best value, which includes criteria like price, technical design, and life-cycle costs. After selection, the entity announces the contract award publicly and ensures a thorough record is kept for audits.
Section § 6825
This section outlines the requirements for a design-build project. It mandates that the design-build entity must provide both payment and performance bonds for the project, as specified by the transportation entity. The amount of the payment bond can't be less than that of the performance bond, and both must be issued by an insurance company authorized in California. Additionally, the contract must include insurance coverage for any design mistakes or errors.
Section § 6826
This law section outlines how transportation entities in California can use design-build contracts for projects. When creating proposals, they need to specify certain subcontractors that must be included, and all construction subcontractors in the proposal are protected by specific legal provisions.
For subcontracting work not initially listed, the design-build entity has to publicly announce the available work, set a specific date and time for awarding it, establish fair qualification criteria, and decide between awarding the contract based on best value or to the lowest bidder.
When choosing the best value, a thorough evaluation is required. Subcontractors chosen this way also receive the same legal protections as initially named subcontractors.
Section § 6826.5
By January 1, 2033, the department must provide a report to the transportation and fiscal committees of the Legislature. This report should cover their experiences using the design-build method for projects, focusing on comparing costs, value, and completion times of these projects.
Section § 6827
This section states that the contents of this chapter do not change any existing legal rights or remedies. In other words, whatever legal rights or options people have under the law are not affected by what is written in this chapter.
Section § 6828
This section means that if any part of this chapter is found to be invalid or illegal, the rest of the chapter can still stand and be enforced. The idea is that the invalid part doesn't affect the enforceability of the valid parts.
Section § 6829
This law explains that the current rules will expire on January 1, 2034. If a specific part of the Streets and Highways Code (Section 91.2) is ruled invalid by a court, these rules will end a year after the announcement of this court decision on the department's website. Importantly, any contracts or agreements made under these rules before they expire will still be valid even after the rules are repealed.