Revisions To The Coastal Zone Boundary - - CA Public Resources

Section § 30150

This section updates the detailed maps that define where the coastal zone's inland boundary is located in California. Initially mapped by the commission on March 1, 1977, the inland boundary has been modified by 35 new maps dated September 12, 1979. These modifications show specific areas that have been added to or removed from the coastal zone, and these maps are available at the commission's office.

Notwithstanding the maps adopted pursuant to Section 17 of Chapter 1330 of the Statutes of 1976, as amended by Section 29 of Chapter 1331 of the Statutes of 1976, the inland boundary of the coastal zone, as shown on the detailed coastal maps adopted by the commission on March 1, 1977, is amended by maps 1 to 35, inclusive, dated September 12, 1979, and which are on file in the office of the commission. Maps 1 to 35, inclusive, are hereby adopted by reference.

The areas deleted and added to the coastal zone are specifically shown on maps 1 to 35, inclusive, adopted by this section, and are generally described in this chapter.

coastal zone boundary inland boundary modification coastal maps amendment commission-adopted maps map update 1979 coastal zone changes 1977 original maps boundary redefinition geographical amendment area additions deletions September 12 1979 maps detailed coastal maps commission's office records boundary adjustment included excluded areas

(Amended by Stats. 1998, Ch. 829, Sec. 48. Effective January 1, 1999.)

Section § 30152

This section outlines specific land areas in Del Norte County, California that are excluded from certain regulations or designations. It breaks down these exclusions by community and provides the corresponding map references for clarity. Near Smith River, about 255 acres are excluded based on map 1. The Fort Dick, Kings Valley, and Meadowbrook Acres areas follow maps 2 and 3 for their exclusions. In Crescent City, approximately 2,250 acres and certain urban areas like Bertsch Subdivision are excluded per maps 2 and 3. Additionally, two acres in Crescent City are excluded as detailed on map 2A, filed in 1982.

In Del Norte County:

(a) Near the community of Smith River, approximately 255 acres are excluded as specifically shown on map 1.

(b) The Fort Dick, Kings Valley, and Meadowbrook Acres areas are excluded as specifically shown on maps 2 and 3.

(c) In and near the City of Crescent City, approximately 2,250 acres between Lake Earl Drive and State Highway Route 101 and other partially urbanized areas, such as the Bertsch Subdivision, are excluded as specifically shown on maps 2 and 3.

(d) In the City of Crescent City, approximately two acres are excluded as specifically shown on map 2A, dated May 5, 1982, and filed on May 20, 1982, with the Office of the Secretary of State.

Del Norte County Smith River Fort Dick Kings Valley Meadowbrook Acres Crescent City Lake Earl Drive State Highway Route 101 Bertsch Subdivision land exclusions map 1 map 2 map 3 map 2A urban areas exclusion

(Amended by Stats. 1982, Ch. 1470, Sec. 1. Effective September 28, 1982.)

Section § 30154

This section outlines specific land exclusions in Humboldt County near the City of Fortuna and within the City of Ferndale, based on maps 4 and 4A. About 265 acres near Fortuna and all of Ferndale as of 1979 are excluded from certain restrictions. Additionally, Ferndale must consider coastal program work when updating its city plans. The State Coastal Conservancy can pursue projects in Ferndale without needing commission approval, even if other laws suggest otherwise.

In Humboldt County:

(a) In and near the City of Fortuna, approximately 265 acres seaward of State Highway Route 101 are excluded as specifically shown on map 4.

(b) All of the incorporated land of the City of Ferndale as of January 1, 1979, is excluded as specifically shown on map 4A. The city shall consider work completed pursuant to its local coastal program in the course of preparing or revising its general plan. Notwithstanding any provision of Division 21 (commencing with Section 31000) to the contrary, the State Coastal Conservancy may undertake projects within the city without approval of the commission.

Humboldt County land exclusion City of Fortuna Ferndale land exclusion State Highway Route 101 map 4 map 4A local coastal program general plan revision State Coastal Conservancy projects commission approval land use planning coastal management urban planning in Ferndale California coastal law land zoning exceptions

(Added by Stats. 1979, Ch. 1109.)

Section § 30156

This law updates the boundary of the Butano Creek watershed in San Mateo County by extending it seaward to a specific five-mile limit that is detailed in another section and illustrated on a specified map.

In San Mateo County, within the Butano Creek watershed, the boundary is moved seaward to the five-mile limit described in Section 30103 and as specifically shown on map 5.

Butano Creek watershed boundary adjustment San Mateo County seaward boundary map 5 five-mile limit watershed boundary geographic boundary change coastal boundary Section 30103 boundary revision land use watershed management regional planning environmental regulation

(Added by Stats. 1979, Ch. 1109.)

Section § 30156.1

This law specifies that in the City of Pacifica, San Mateo County, around 11 acres of land located east of State Highway Route 1, as detailed in a specific transportation director's deed, is included and marked on Map 5.

In San Mateo County, in the City of Pacifica, approximately 11 acres situated east of State Highway Route 1 and described in Director’s Deed DD-028764-01-01 from the Director of Transportation, is included, as specifically shown on Map 5.

San Mateo County City of Pacifica State Highway Route 1 Director's Deed DD-028764-01-01 transportation land description Map 5 land inclusion Pacific Coast property boundaries California roadways coastal land Transportation Maps

(Added by Stats. 1988, Ch. 1381, Sec. 2. Repealed conditionally on January 1, 1994, by Sec. 4 of Ch. 1381.)

Section § 30158

This section describes changes to geographic boundaries in Santa Cruz County. Near Bonny Doon, the boundary is extended towards the ocean according to specific maps. In Watsonville, around 40 acres in the southwestern part of the city are excluded from this boundary as detailed on another map.

In Santa Cruz County:

(a) Near the community of Bonny Doon, the boundary is moved seaward to the five-mile limit described in Section 30103 and as specifically shown on maps 6 and 7.

(b) In the Watsonville area approximately 40 acres in the southwest portion of the city are excluded as specifically shown on map 8.

Santa Cruz County Bonny Doon boundary adjustment five-mile limit Watsonville geographic boundaries map 6 map 7 map 8 seaward boundary acre exclusion ocean boundary community planning Bonny Doon boundary Watsonville exclusion

(Added by Stats. 1979, Ch. 1109.)

Section § 30160

This law section outlines specific areas in Monterey County where certain land is either included or excluded from the inland coastal zone boundaries. It gives detailed descriptions of land in cities such as Marina, Sand City, Seaside, Monterey, Pacific Grove, and Del Monte Forest, specifying exact plots on maps and mentioning the requirement of buffers along certain areas like highways and railroad right-of-ways. The adjustments to these boundaries are based on maps and legislative amendments from the 1979–80 session, affecting how coastal development is managed in these areas.

In Monterey County:

(a) In the City of Marina, approximately 400 acres between Del Monte Boulevard and the new alignment of State Highway Route 1 are excluded as specifically shown on map 9.

(b) In the City of Sand City approximately 125 acres landward of a 200-foot buffer along the new alignment of State Highway Route 1 are excluded as specifically shown on map 10; provided, however, a buffer of 100 feet along either side of the railroad right-of-way through the city together with such right-of-way are not excluded.

(c) In the City of Seaside approximately 29 acres northeast of Laguna del Rey are excluded as specifically shown on map 10; provided, however, a 125-foot buffer along the edge of Laguna Grande, a 100-foot buffer along each side of the channel connecting Roberts Lake and Laguna Grande, and a 100-foot buffer along either side of the railroad right-of-way together with such right-of-way are not excluded.

(d) In the City of Monterey, the downtown area, and the Cannery Row area between Lighthouse Avenue and the extreme edge of the railroad right-of-way, are excluded as specifically shown on map 11; provided, however, that the one block area bounded by Foam Street and Wave Street, and Prescott Avenue and Hoffman Avenue, is not excluded.

Notwithstanding any map referenced by Section 30150, dated September 12, 1979, and filed on September 14, 1979, with the office of the Secretary of State, the inland coastal zone boundary described in this subdivision shall be as prescribed by the amendments to this section made during the second year of the 1979–80 Regular Session of the Legislature.

(e) In the City of Pacific Grove approximately 300 acres are excluded as specifically shown on map 11; provided, however, that the railroad right-of-way is not excluded.

(f) In the Del Monte Forest, approximately 90 acres known as the Navaho Tract are added as specifically shown on map 11.

(g) In the area between the intersection of the boundary and the easterly line of Section 26, T. 17 S., R. 1 E., M.D.M. and the intersection of the boundary and the northeasterly corner of Section 1, T. 19 S., R. 1 E., M.D.M., and in the vicinity of the head of the Middle Fork of Devil’s Canyon and the head of the South Fork of Devil’s Canyon the boundary is moved seaward to the five-mile limit described in Section 30103 and as specifically shown on maps 12, 13, and 14.

Monterey County coastal zone City of Marina land exclusion Del Monte Forest Navaho Tract Sand City land buffer Seaside coastal boundary Monterey Cannery Row Pacific Grove land exclusion inland coastal zone boundary State Highway Route 1 alignment railroad right-of-way buffer Devil’s Canyon boundary Laguna Grande buffer Roberts Lake channel map 9 exclusion map 10 amendment

(Amended by Stats. 1980, Ch. 170, Sec. 1. Effective June 12, 1980.)

Section § 30162

This section concerns boundary changes in certain coastal areas of Santa Barbara County. For Rancho San Julian and the Jalama Creek watershed, the boundary extends to a five-mile limit as noted in a specific map. In the Devereux Lagoon and Goleta Slough, 170 acres are excluded and 245 acres are added according to maps, but areas planned for a housing project by the University of California are not included.

In Santa Barbara County:

(a) In Rancho San Julian and generally within the watershed of Jalama Creek, the boundary is moved seaward to the five-mile limit described in Section 30103 and as specifically shown on map 16.

(b) In the Devereux Lagoon and Goleta Slough areas, approximately 170 acres are excluded and 245 acres are added as specifically shown on maps 17 and 18; provided, however, that the land areas on which the University of California has proposed a 200 unit housing project are not included.

Santa Barbara County Rancho San Julian watershed Jalama Creek boundary change Devereux Lagoon Goleta Slough acreage adjustment University of California housing project exclusion coastal boundary land inclusion land exclusion map-based boundaries five-mile limit

(Added by Stats. 1979, Ch. 1109.)

Section § 30164

This law section details changes to land boundaries in Ventura County, California. Near the Ventura River, 190 acres are added. In San Buenaventura, 240 acres are removed. In Oxnard and a nearby unincorporated area, 130 acres are removed and 85 acres are added. There's also a boundary adjustment extending seaward in Section 36 to a five-mile limit. These adjustments are shown on specific maps.

In Ventura County:

(a) Near the mouth of the Ventura River, approximately 190 acres are added as specifically shown on map 19.

(b) In the City of San Buenaventura, approximately 240 acres are excluded as specifically shown on map 19.

(c) In the City of Oxnard and a small unincorporated area, approximately 130 acres are excluded and approximately 85 acres are added as specifically shown on map 20.

(d) In the area described as Section 36, T. 1 N., R. 20 W., S.B.B.L., the boundary is moved seaward to the five-mile limit described in Section 30103 and as specifically shown on map 21.

Ventura County Ventura River San Buenaventura Oxnard land boundary changes acreage adjustments map 19 map 20 map 21 unincorporated area seaward boundary Section 36 five-mile limit land exclusion land addition

(Added by Stats. 1979, Ch. 1109.)

Section § 30166

This law details boundary and zoning adjustments in various parts of Los Angeles County. In certain spots in the Santa Monica Mountains, the boundary is moved closer to the ocean, as shown on specific maps. Several territories in the Temescal Canyon watershed are included due to ownership by specific organizations. In Los Angeles and El Segundo, some industrially significant areas are excluded from specific zones. Certain lands in Manhattan Beach, Hermosa Beach, and Palos Verdes Estates, as well as areas in Long Beach near Colorado Lagoon and another near Pacific Coast Highway, are also excluded, with details on specific maps. The changes ensure the coastal zone boundary in Venice stays as it is.

In Los Angeles County:

(a) In three locations within the Santa Monica Mountains, the boundary is moved seaward to the five-mile limit described in Section 30103 and as specifically shown on maps 22, 23, and 24.

(b) In the Temescal Canyon watershed in the City of Los Angeles, all lands owned or controlled by the Presbyterian Synod, the University of California, the Los Angeles County Sanitation District, and the Los Angeles Unified School District are added.

(c) In the Cities of Los Angeles and El Segundo, the areas east of Vista del Mar that include the Scattergood Steam Plant, the Hyperion Sewage Treatment Plant, and portions of an oil refinery are excluded as specifically shown on map 25. In adopting this boundary change, the Legislature specifically reaffirms the existing location of the coastal zone boundary in the Venice area of the City of Los Angeles.

(d) In the City of Manhattan Beach, approximately 140 acres, and in the City of Hermosa Beach, approximately 170 acres, are excluded as specifically shown on maps 25 and 26.

(e) In the City of Palos Verdes Estates, approximately 95 acres landward of Paseo del Mar are excluded as specifically shown on map 26.

(f) In the City of Long Beach, the area near Colorado Lagoon is excluded as specifically shown on map 27.

(g) In the City of Long Beach, the area commencing at the intersection of the existing coastal zone boundary at Colorado Street and Pacific Coast Highway, thence southerly along Pacific Coast Highway to the intersection of Loynes Drive, thence easterly along Loynes Drive to the intersection of Los Cerritos Channel, thence northerly along Los Cerritos Channel to the existing coastal zone boundary, is excluded as specifically shown on map 27A.

Santa Monica Mountains Temescal Canyon watershed Presbyterian Synod land University of California land Los Angeles County Sanitation District Los Angeles Unified School District Scattergood Steam Plant Hyperion Sewage Treatment Plant Vista del Mar area Venice boundary reaffirmed Manhattan Beach exclusion Hermosa Beach exclusion Palos Verdes Estates exclusion Colorado Lagoon Long Beach boundary changes

(Amended by Stats. 2006, Ch. 538, Sec. 586. Effective January 1, 2007.)

Section § 30166.5

This law mandates that by January 15, 2002, the commission must provide the City of Malibu with a draft of their local coastal program. This program specifically concerns land use within Malibu's coastal zone, as shown on certain official maps.

Furthermore, by September 15, 2002, the commission is required, after public hearings and discussions with Malibu, to adopt a finalized local coastal program. Once adopted, this program will be automatically certified, letting the City of Malibu take over the responsibility of granting coastal development permits. If Malibu doesn't decide on such permit applications in a timely manner, those applications cannot be automatically approved.

(a) On or before January 15, 2002, the commission shall submit to the City of Malibu an initial draft of the land use portion of the local coastal program for the City of Malibu portion of the coastal zone, which is specifically delineated on maps 133, 134, 135, and 136, which were placed on file with the Secretary of State on September 14, 1979.

(b) On or before September 15, 2002, the commission shall, after public hearing and consultation with the City of Malibu, adopt a local coastal program for that area within the City of Malibu portion of the coastal zone that is specifically delineated on maps 133, 134, 135, and 136, which have been placed on file with the Secretary of State on March 14, 1977, and March 1, 1987. The local coastal program for the area shall, after adoption by the commission, be deemed certified, and shall, for all purposes of this division, constitute the certified local coastal program for the area. Subsequent to the certification of the local coastal program, the City of Malibu shall immediately assume coastal development permitting authority, pursuant to this division. Notwithstanding the requirements of Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 65920) of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, once the City of Malibu assumes coastal development permitting authority pursuant to this section, no application for a coastal development permit shall be deemed approved if the city fails to take timely action to approve or deny the application.

local coastal program City of Malibu coastal zone land use draft public hearing consultation with Malibu certified program coastal development permits map delineation permitting authority timely action permit application program adoption January 15 2002 deadline September 15 2002 deadline

(Added by Stats. 2000, Ch. 952, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 2001.)

Section § 30168

This law outlines changes to land areas in several cities within Orange County. In Huntington Beach, 9.5 acres are added, while in Costa Mesa, 15 acres are removed. Newport Beach gains 22.6 acres along the Pacific Coast Highway, but these may be removed if used for hospital purposes. In Niguel Hill, parts of Pacific Island Village are excluded. Dana Point and Laguna Niguel see an exclusion of approximately 450 acres inland. Capistrano Beach excludes about 381 acres near the freeway, while San Clemente adds 230 acres and excludes 214 acres in different regions and maps.

In Orange County:

(a) In the City of Huntington Beach, approximately 9.5 acres are added as specifically shown on map 28.

(b) In the City of Costa Mesa, approximately 15 acres are excluded as specifically shown on map 28.

(c) In the City of Newport Beach, approximately 22.6 acres adjacent to Pacific Coast Highway are added as specifically shown on map 28; provided, however, that the area described in this subdivision shall be excluded from the coastal zone, if the Department of Transportation, within one year from the effective date of this act, enters into an agreement for use of this area for hospital-related purposes.

(d) In the Niguel Hill area, the developed portions of Pacific Island Village are excluded as specifically shown on map 29.

(e) In the communities of Dana Point and Laguna Niguel, approximately 450 acres inland of the Pacific Coast Highway are excluded as specifically shown on map 29A.

(f) In the community of Capistrano Beach, approximately 381 acres seaward of the San Diego Freeway are excluded as specifically shown on map 29A.

(g) In the City of San Clemente, approximately 230 acres seaward of the San Diego Freeway are added as specifically shown on map 29B, dated September 1, 1981, and filed on September 1, 1981, with the Office of the Secretary of State.

(h) In the City of San Clemente, approximately 214 acres inland and seaward of the San Diego Freeway are excluded as specifically shown on maps 29A and 30.

Orange County land changes Huntington Beach land addition Costa Mesa land exclusion Newport Beach coastal zone Pacific Coast Highway hospital-related land use Niguel Hill Pacific Island Village Dana Point land exclusion Laguna Niguel inland land Capistrano Beach San Diego Freeway San Clemente land changes map 28 map 29 map 29A map 29B

(Amended (as added by Stats. 1979, Ch. 1109) by Stats. 1982, Ch. 43, Sec. 5.5. Effective February 17, 1982.)

Section § 30169

This law addresses a dispute over the location of the inland boundary of the coastal zone in Aliso Viejo, Orange County, aiming to resolve it by redefining the boundary for the benefit of local planning. Around 286 acres are added to, and 1,020 acres are removed from, the coastal zone based on specified maps. The law allows minor boundary adjustments to accommodate development while ensuring protection of coastal resources.

An agreement is required between Aliso Viejo Company and the Commission to provide 1,000 units of affordable housing units along with additional moderate and low-income housing units to meet local housing needs, with resale controls enforced by local agencies. The law details the regulatory framework for infrastructure necessary for community development, limiting the Commission's role to ensuring these developments do not harm coastal resources. The legal framework becomes operative once the agreement is formalized and recorded.

(a) The Legislature hereby finds and declares that a dispute exists as to the proper location of the inland boundary of the coastal zone in the area commonly known as Aliso Viejo and that, after extensive review of the history of this boundary segment, the criteria utilized to establish the boundary in 1976, and the relevant topographical information, it is possible to reach differing conclusions of equal validity regarding the proper location of the coastal zone boundary. The Legislature further finds that it is not possible to determine objectively which ridgeline feature in the Aliso Viejo area most closely approximates the boundary criteria utilized by the Legislature in 1976, and that it is in the best public interest to resolve the current boundary dispute in order to avoid further delay in the completion of the local coastal program for Orange County. The Legislature further finds that a timely resolution of this boundary dispute can best be accomplished by adjusting the coastal zone boundary in the manner set forth in this section and within the general framework of Section 30103 and consistent with the need to protect the coastal resources of the Aliso Viejo area and to carry out the requirements of Section 30213.

(b) In the Aliso Creek area of Orange County approximately 286 acres are added and approximately 1,020 acres are excluded as specifically shown on maps 28A and 28B dated April 15, 1980, and filed on April 22, 1980, with the office of the Secretary of State and which are on file in the office of the commission. The maps are hereby adopted by reference. The changes made in the inland boundary of the coastal zone by this section are in addition to any changes made by any map referred to in Section 30150, except to the extent that the changes made by this section affect a segment of the boundary previously changed by the map, in which case the changes made by this section shall supersede any of those previous changes.

(c) The executive director of the commission may adjust the precise location of the inland boundary of the coastal zone not more than 100 yards in either a seaward or landward direction in order to conform the precise boundary location to the specific limits of development adjacent to the coastal zone boundary as shown on maps 28A and 28B. However, in any subdivided area, the executive director may adjust the precise location of the inland boundary of the coastal zone not more than 100 feet in a landward direction in order to include any development of the first row of lots immediately adjacent to the boundary as shown on those maps, where the executive director determines that the adjustment is necessary to ensure that adequate controls will be applied to the development in order to minimize any potential adverse effects on the coastal zone resources. The executive director shall prepare a detailed map showing any of the changes and shall file a copy of the map with the county clerk.

(d) Prior to the adoption and approval of a drainage control plan by the County of Orange for the Aliso Viejo Planned Community (as designated by Amendment No. L. U. 79-1 to the Land Use Element of the Orange County General Plan), the county shall consult with the executive director of the commission to ensure that any drainage control facilities located outside the coastal zone are adequate to provide for no increase in peak runoff, by virtue of the development of the Aliso Viejo Planned Community, which would result in adverse impacts on coastal zone resources.

(e) On or before January 31, 1981, the commission shall, after public hearing and in consultation with the County of Orange, certify or reject a local coastal program segment prepared and submitted by the county on or before August 1, 1980, for the following parcel in the Aliso Creek area: land owned by the Aliso Viejo Company, a California corporation, as of April 22, 1980, within the coastal zone as amended by this section. The local coastal program required by this subdivision shall, for all purposes of this division, constitute a certified local coastal program segment for that parcel in the County of Orange. The segment of the county’s local coastal program for the parcel may be amended pursuant to this division relating to the amendment of local coastal programs. If the commission neither certifies nor rejects the submitted local coastal program within the time limit specified in this subdivision, the land added to the coastal zone by this section shall no longer be subject to this division. It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this subdivision, that a procedure to expedite the preparation and adoption of a local coastal program for that land be established so that the public and the affected property owner know as soon as possible what uses are permissible.

(f) The commission, through its executive director, shall enter into a binding and enforceable agreement with Aliso Viejo Company, and the agreement shall be recorded as a covenant to run with the land with no prior liens other than tax and assessment liens restricting the Aliso Viejo Planned Community. The agreement shall provide for all of the following:

(1) The Aliso Viejo Company shall provide at least 1,000 units of for-sale housing to moderate-income persons at prices affordable to a range of households earning from 81 to 120 percent of the median income for Orange County as adjusted for family size pursuant to the commission’s housing guidelines on affordable housing dated January 22, 1980, and July 16, 1979, and any additional provisions as agreed to between the commission and the Aliso Viejo Company as referred to in this subdivision.

For purposes of this subdivision, median income constitutes the figure most recently established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development at the time the public report for the units, or any portion thereof, is issued by the Bureau of Real Estate. The affordable units required by this subdivision shall be priced equally over the moderate-income range and shall reflect a reasonable mix as to size and number of bedrooms.

(2) The 1,000 units provided pursuant to this subdivision shall be sold subject to controls on resale substantially as provided in the commission’s housing guidelines on affordable housing, dated January 22, 1980, and July 16, 1979, and any additional provisions as agreed to between the commission and the Aliso Viejo Company as referred to in this subdivision. On or before entering the agreement provided for herein, the Aliso Viejo Company shall enter into an agreement, approved by the executive director of the commission, with the Orange County Housing Authority or any other appropriate housing agency acceptable to the executive director of the commission to provide for the administration of the resale controls including the qualification of purchasers.

(3) The 1,000 units provided pursuant to this subdivision may be dispersed throughout the Aliso Viejo Planned Community, and shall be completed and offered for sale prior to, or simultaneously with, other units in the overall project, so that at any time at least 7¹/₂ percent of the units constructed shall be resale-controlled until the 1,000 units are completed.

(4) The Department of Housing and Community Development and the County of Orange shall be third-party beneficiaries to the agreement provided in this subdivision and shall have the power to enforce any and all provisions of the agreement.

(5) This agreement may only be amended upon the determination of the Aliso Viejo Company or its successors or assigns, the commission, the Department of Housing and Community Development, and the County of Orange that the change is necessary in order to prevent adverse effects on the supply of low- and moderate-income housing opportunities and to improve the methods of providing the housing at continually affordable prices.

The Legislature hereby finds and declares that, because the Aliso Viejo Company, in addition to the 1,000 units of controlled housing provided in this subdivision, will provide for 2,000 units of subsidized affordable housing for low-income persons and 2,000 affordable housing units for moderate-income persons pursuant to the company’s housing program, the purposes of Section 30213 will be met by enactment of this subdivision. The Legislature further finds and declares that the general provisions of this subdivision are specifically described and set forth in letters by Aliso Viejo Company and the executive director of the commission published in the Journals of the Senate and the Assembly of the 1979–80 Regular Session, and it is the intent of the Legislature that the commission and Aliso Viejo Company conform the agreement provided in this subdivision to the specific provisions described in the letters.

(g) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the application of this division by the commission to the development or use of any infrastructure necessary and appropriate to serve development within the portions of the Aliso Viejo Planned Community located inland of the coastal zone as amended by this section, shall be strictly limited to addressing direct impacts on coastal zone resources and shall be carried out in a manner that assures that the infrastructure will be provided. Furthermore, the commission shall amend without conditions its prior permit No. A-61-76 to provide for its release of sewer outfall flow limitations necessary and appropriate to serve the Aliso Viejo Planned Community located inland of the coastal zone as amended by this subdivision. For purposes of this subdivision, “infrastructure” means those facilities and improvements necessary and appropriate to develop, construct, and serve urban communities, including but not limited to, streets, roads, and highways; transportation systems and facilities; schools; parks; water and sewage systems and facilities; electric, gas, and communications systems and facilities; and drainage and flood control systems and facilities. Notwithstanding this subdivision, the commission may limit, or reasonably condition, the use of the transit corridor in Aliso Creek Valley to transit uses, uses approved by the commission that will serve the Aliso Greenbelt Project prepared by the State Coastal Conservancy, the provision of access to and from the sewage treatment works in Aliso Creek Valley, emergency uses, and drainage and flood control systems and facilities and other services approved pursuant to this subdivision.

(h) This section shall become operative only when the commission and Aliso Viejo Company have entered into the binding and enforceable agreement provided for in this section, and the agreement has been duly recorded with the county recorder of Orange County.

Aliso Viejo coastal zone boundary boundary adjustment Orange County local coastal program affordable housing moderate-income housing Aliso Viejo Company resale controls housing guidelines development impact infrastructure development sewer outfall flow transit corridor binding agreement

(Amended by Stats. 2013, Ch. 352, Sec. 487. (AB 1317) Effective September 26, 2013. Operative July 1, 2013, by Sec. 543 of Ch. 352.)

Section § 30170

This section details specific land areas in San Diego County, particularly in the cities of Oceanside, Carlsbad, and San Diego, that are included or excluded from certain development or coastal zone regulations. It describes exact boundaries using specific lots, maps, and landmarks.

For areas like Carlsbad and around Palomar Airport, development rules require a drainage plan approved by local government officials, the commission, and the Department of Fish and Wildlife to prevent water runoff issues. The City of Carlsbad must develop and adopt a local coastal program meeting specific requirements, such as protecting farmland and recreational opportunities, otherwise, the land might be removed from the coastal zone.

In San Diego, areas like Carmel Valley and Mount Soledad involve drainage and transportation plans that need to be certified before being excluded from coastal zone oversight. The Famosa Slough and other specific regions are noted for inclusion, with certain exclusions from permits for activities that don't significantly impact the environment.

In San Diego County:

(a) In the City of Oceanside, approximately 500 acres are excluded as specifically shown on maps 30A and 31.

(b) In the City of Carlsbad, approximately 180 acres in the downtown area, except for the Elm Street corridor, are excluded as specifically shown on map 31.

(c) In the City of Carlsbad, the area lying north of the Palomar Airport as generally shown on maps 31 and 32 and as specifically described in this subdivision is excluded.

Those portions of lots “F” and “G” of Rancho Agua Hedionda, part in the City of Carlsbad and part in the unincorporated area of the County of San Diego, State of California, according to the partition map thereof No. 823, filed in the office of the county recorder of that county, November 16, 1896, described as follows:

Commencing at point 1 of said lot “F” as shown on said map; thence along the boundary line of said lot “F” south 25° 33´ 56″ east, 229.00 feet to point 23 of said lot “F” and south 54° 40´ 19″ east, 1347.00 feet; thence leaving said boundary line south 35° 19´ 44″ west, 41.28 feet to the true point of beginning, which point is the true point of beginning, of the land described in deed to Japatul Corporation recorded December 8, 1975, at recorder’s file/page No. 345107 of official records to said county; thence along the boundary line of said land south 35° 19´ 44″ west, 2216.46 feet and north 53° 02´ 49″ west, 1214.69 feet to the northeast corner of the land described in deed to Japatul Corporation recorded December 8, 1975, at recorder’s file/page No. 345103 of said official records; thence along the boundary lines of said land as follows: West, 1550 feet, more or less, to the boundary of said lot “F”; south 00° 12´ 00″ west, 550 feet, more or less, to point 5 of said lot “F”; south 10° 25´ 10″ east along a straight line between said point 5 and point 14 of said lot “F,” to point 14 of said lot “F”; thence along the boundary of said lot “F” south 52° 15´ 45″ east (record south 51° 00´ 00″ east) 1860.74 feet more or less to the most westerly corner of the land conveyed to James L. Hieatt, et ux, by deed recorded June 11, 1913, in Book 617, page 54 of deed, records of said county; thence along the northwesterly and northeasterly boundary of Hieatt’s land as follows: North 25° 00´ 00″ east, 594.00 feet and south 52° 15´ 45″ east (record south 51° 00´ 00″ east per deed) 1348.61 feet to a point of intersection with the northerly line of Palomar County Airport, said point being on the boundary of the land conveyed to Japatul Corporation by deed recorded December 8, 1975, at recorder’s file/page No. 345107 of said official records; thence along said boundary as follows: North 79° 10´ 00″ east, 4052.22 feet north 10° 50´ 00″ west, 500.00 feet; north 79° 10´ 00″ east 262.00 feet, south 10° 50´ 00″ east, 500.00 feet; north 79° 10´ 00″ east, 1005 feet, more or less, to the westerly line of the land conveyed to the County of San Diego by deed recorded May 28, 1970, at recorder’s file/page No. 93075 of said official records; thence continuing along the boundary of last said Japatul Corporation’s land north 38° 42´ 44″ west, 2510.58 feet to the beginning of a tangent 1845.00 foot radius curve concave northeasterly; along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 14° 25´ 52″ a distance of 464.70 feet to a point of the southerly boundary of the land allotted to Thalia Kelly Considine, et al., by partial final judgment in partition, recorded January 18, 1963, at recorder’s file/page No. 11643 of said official records; thence continuing along last said Japatul Corporation’s land south 67° 50´ 28″ west, 1392.80 feet north 33° 08´ 52″ west, 915.12 feet and north 00° 30´ 53″ west, 1290.37 feet to the southerly line of said land conveyed to the County of San Diego, being also the northerly line of last said Japatul Corporation’s land; thence along said common line north 74° 57´ 25″ west, 427.67 feet to the beginning of a tangent 2045.00 foot radius curve concave northerly; and westerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 16° 59´ 24″, a distance of 606.41 feet to the true point of beginning.

And those properties known as assessors parcel Nos. 212-020-08, 212-020-22, and 212-020-23.

Excepting therefrom, that portion, if any, conveyed to the County of San Diego, by quitclaim deed recorded January 12, 1977, at recorder’s file/page No. 012820 of said official records.

No development may occur in the area described in this subdivision until a plan for drainage of the parcel to be developed has been approved by the local government having jurisdiction over the area after consultation with the commission and the Department of Fish and Wildlife. The plan shall assure that no detrimental increase occurs in runoff of water from the parcel to be developed and shall require that the facilities necessary to implement the plan are installed as part of the development.

(d) In the City of Carlsbad and adjacent unincorporated areas, approximately 600 acres consisting of the Palomar Airport and an adjoining industrial park are excluded as specifically shown on maps 31 and 32.

(e) An area consisting of approximately 333 acres lying west and south of the Palomar Airport and bounded on the south by Palomar Airport Road is excluded as specifically shown on maps 31 and 32.

(f) On or before October 1, 1980, the commission shall, after public hearing and in consultation with the City of Carlsbad, prepare, approve, and adopt a local coastal program for the following parcels in the vicinity of Batiquitos Lagoon within the City of Carlsbad: lands owned by Rancho La Costa, a registered limited partnership, lands (consisting of approximately 80 acres) owned by Standard Pacific of San Diego, Inc., that were conveyed by Rancho La Costa on October 8, 1977, and lands owned by the Occidental Petroleum Company. Those parcels shall be determined by ownership as of September 12, 1979. As used in this subdivision, “parcels” means the parcels identified in this paragraph. The local coastal program required by this subdivision shall include all of the following elements:

(1) Protection of agricultural lands and uses to the extent feasible.

(2) Minimization of adverse impacts from sedimentation.

(3) Protection of feasible public recreational opportunities.

(4) Provision for economically feasible development consistent with the three elements specified in this subdivision.

The local coastal program required by this subdivision shall, after adoption by the commission, be deemed certified and shall for all purposes of this division constitute certified local coastal program segments for those parcels in the City of Carlsbad. The segments of the city’s local coastal program for those parcels may be amended pursuant to the provisions of this division relating to the amendment of local coastal programs. In addition, until (i) the City of Carlsbad adopts or enacts the implementing actions contained in the local coastal program, or (ii) other statutory provisions provide alternately for the adoption, certification, and implementation of a local coastal program for those parcels, the local coastal program required by this subdivision may also be amended by the commission at the request of the owner of any of those parcels. For administrative purposes, the commission may group these requests in order to schedule them for consideration at a single commission hearing. However, the commission shall schedule these requests for consideration at least once during each four-month period, beginning January 1, 1982. After either of these events occur, however, these property owners shall no longer be eligible to request the commission to amend the local coastal program.

If the commission fails to adopt a local coastal program within the time limits specified in this subdivision, those parcels shall be excluded from the coastal zone and shall no longer be subject to this division. It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this subdivision that a procedure to expedite the preparation and adoption of a local coastal program for those parcels be established so that the public and affected property owners know as soon as possible what the permissible uses of those lands are.

(g) In the vicinity of the intersection of Del Mar Heights Road and the San Diego Freeway, approximately 250 acres are excluded as specifically shown on map 33.

(h) In the vicinity of the intersection of Carmel Valley Road and the San Diego Freeway, approximately 45 acres are added as specifically shown on map 33.

In the City of San Diego, the Carmel Valley area consisting of approximately 1,400 acres as shown on map 33 that has been placed on file with the Secretary of State on January 23, 1980, shall be excluded from the coastal zone after the City of San Diego submits, and the commission certifies, a drainage plan and a transportation plan for the area. The city shall implement and enforce the certified drainage and transportation plans. Any amendments or changes to the underlying land use plan for the area that affects drainage, or to either the certified drainage or transportation plan, shall be reviewed and processed in the same manner as an amendment of a certified local coastal program pursuant to Section 30514. Any land use not in conformance with the certified drainage and transportation plans may be appealed to the commission pursuant to the appeals procedure as provided by Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 30600). The drainage plan and any amendments thereto shall be prepared after consultation with the Department of Fish and Wildlife and shall ensure that problems resulting from water runoff, sedimentation, and siltation are adequately identified and resolved.

(i) Near the head of the south branch of Los Penasquitos Canyon, the boundary is moved seaward to the five-mile limit as described in Section 30103 and as specifically shown on map 33.

(j) In the City of San Diego, approximately 1,855 acres known as the Mount Soledad and La Jolla Mesa areas are added as specifically shown on map 34. However, on or before February 29, 1980, and pursuant to either subdivision (d) of Section 30610 or Section 30610.5, the commission shall exclude from coastal development permit requirements any single-family residence within the area specified in this subdivision. No coastal development permit shall be required for any improvement, maintenance activity, relocation, or reasonable expansion of any commercial radio or television transmission facilities within the area specified in this subdivision unless the proposed activity could result in a significant change in the density or intensity of use in the area or could have a significant adverse impact on highly scenic resources of public importance. However, no prior review by the commission of this activity shall be required.

(k) In the City of San Diego, approximately 30 acres known as the Famosa Slough is added as specifically shown on maps 34 and 35.

Oceanside land exclusion Carlsbad land boundaries Palomar Airport area Runoff drainage plan Local coastal program Batiquitos Lagoon Carmel Valley drainage plan Mount Soledad inclusion Coastal development permits Famosa Slough inclusion Sedimentation impact Public recreation protection Agricultural land protection Coastal zone boundary Environmental impact approval

(Amended by Stats. 2022, Ch. 97, Sec. 1. (SB 1497) Effective January 1, 2023.)

Section § 30170.6

This law changes the inland boundary of a coastal zone in San Diego County near Penasquitos Canyon by updating a map from 1980. However, this change will only take place if San Diego submits and gets approval for a drainage plan ensuring that the extension of Mira Mesa Boulevard does not increase water runoff into Carroll Canyon.

Notwithstanding Section 17 of Chapter 1330 of the Statutes of 1976, as amended by Section 29 of Chapter 1331 of the Statutes of 1976, any map dated September 12, 1979, and filed on September 14, 1979, with the office of the Secretary of State, or any provision of Section 30170, the inland boundary of the coastal zone in a portion of San Diego County, of approximately 95 acres in Penasquitos Canyon, is hereby amended as indicated by revised map number 33, dated March 21, 1980, and filed on March 21, 1980, with the office of the Secretary of State; provided, that the City of San Diego first submits and the commission approves a drainage plan for the area providing for drainage in connection with the extension of Mira Mesa Boulevard to Interstate Highway 805 sufficient to assure that no detrimental increase in runoff of water into Carroll Canyon occurs as a result of construction of Mira Mesa Boulevard.

inland boundary coastal zone San Diego County Penasquitos Canyon Mira Mesa Boulevard extension drainage plan water runoff Carroll Canyon revised map map amendment City of San Diego Secretary of State filing construction impact

(Added by Stats. 1980, Ch. 631, Sec. 1.)

Section § 30171

This section outlines the timeline and process for developing a local coastal program for a specific area in the City of Carlsbad, as shown on maps filed with the Secretary of State in 1980. The Commission must first draft the program and later adopt it after public hearing and consultation. Once adopted, the program is certified and may be amended in specific ways, including upon request from local property owners until such time the city enacts its own implementations. If the Commission fails to adopt the program by the deadline, the area is excluded from coastal zone regulations. The law ensures there's no change in contractual deadlines between the commission and any parties regarding planning services.

(a) On or before October 1, 1980, the commission shall submit to the City of Carlsbad an initial draft of the land use portion of the local coastal program for the area specifically delineated on maps 154 and 155 which have been placed on file with the Secretary of State on April 22, 1980.

(b) On or before July 1, 1981, the commission shall, after public hearing and consultation with the City of Carlsbad, adopt a local coastal program for that area within the City of Carlsbad which is specifically delineated on maps 154 and 155 which have been placed on file with the Secretary of State on April 22, 1980. The local coastal program for such area shall, after adoption by the commission, be deemed certified, and shall, for all purposes of this division, constitute the certified local coastal program for such area. The local coastal program for such area may be amended pursuant to the provisions of this division relating to the amendment of local coastal programs. In addition, until such time as (i) the City of Carlsbad adopts or enacts the implementing actions contained in any such local coastal program, or (ii) other statutory provisions provide alternately for the adoption, certification, and implementation of a local coastal program for that area, the local coastal program required by this subdivision may also be amended by the commission at the request of any owner of property located within the area. For administrative purposes, the commission may group these requests in order to schedule them for consideration at a single commission hearing; provided, however, that the commission shall schedule these requests for consideration at least once during each four-month period, beginning January 1, 1982. After either of these events occur, however, these property owners shall no longer be eligible to request the commission to amend the local coastal program.

(c) If the commission fails to adopt such local coastal program within the time limits specified in this subdivision, such area shall be excluded from the coastal zone and shall no longer be subject to the provisions of this division. It is the intent of the Legislature, in enacting this section, that a procedure to expedite the preparation and adoption of a local coastal program in this specified area be established so that the public and affected property owners know as soon as possible what the permissible uses of such lands are.

(d) This section is not intended and shall not be construed as authorizing any modification, extension, or alteration in any deadline or other provisions of any contract between the commission or any regional coastal commission and any person, business, or corporation with respect to planning services for the area delineated on maps 154 and 155.

local coastal program City of Carlsbad public hearing land use property owners amendment process certification of local programs planning services deadlines coastal zone exclusion Secretary of State maps area delineation Legislative intent Commission hearing schedule map 154 map 155

(Amended by Stats. 1982, Ch. 43, Sec. 7. Effective February 17, 1982.)

Section § 30171.2

This law addresses the handling of agricultural conversion fees in Carlsbad starting January 1, 1985. New fees cannot be levied under the local coastal agricultural subsidy program, but parts of the program allowing for developmental rights remain unchanged.

Existing agreements or contracts made before 1985 are unaffected, and the fees collected before this date must be used for improvements benefiting Carlsbad agriculture or refunded to those who paid them. Reimbursements must occur within 90 days of either January 1, 1985, or the fee payment, and require a waiver of legal claims.

Claimants must apply to the Department of General Services for refunds. Funds may also be used for improvements outside Carlsbad's coastal zone if they support local agriculture and align with the program's goals.

(a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), on and after January 1, 1985, no agricultural conversion fees may be levied or collected under the agricultural subsidy program provided in the local coastal program of the City of Carlsbad that was adopted and certified pursuant to Section 30171. All other provisions of that program shall continue to be operative, including the right to develop designated areas as provided in the program.

(b) This section shall not affect any right or obligation under any agreement or contract entered into prior to January 1, 1985, pursuant to that agricultural subsidy program, including the payment of any fees and the right of development in accordance with the provisions of the agreement or contract. As to these properties, the agricultural subsidy fees in existence as of December 31, 1984, shall be paid and allocated within the City of Carlsbad, or on projects outside the city that benefit agricultural programs within the city, in accordance with the provisions of the agricultural subsidy program as it existed on September 30, 1984.

(c) Any agricultural conversion fees collected pursuant to the agricultural subsidy program and not deposited in the agricultural improvement fund in accordance with the local coastal program or that have not been expended in the form of agricultural subsidies assigned to landowners by the local coastal program land use policy plan on January 1, 1985, shall be used by the Department of General Services to reimburse the party that paid the fees if no agreements or contracts have been entered into or to the original parties to the agreements or contracts referred to in subdivision (b) in proportion to the amount of fees paid by the parties. However, if the property subject to the fee was under option at the time that the original agreement or contract was entered into and the optionee was a party to the agricultural subsidy agreement, payments allocable to that property shall be paid to the optionee in the event the optionee has exercised the option. Reimbursements under this section shall be paid within 90 days after January 1, 1985, or payment of the fee, whichever occurs later, and only after waiver by the party being reimbursed of any potential legal rights resulting from enactment of this section.

(d)

(1) Any person entitled to reimbursement of fees under subdivision (c) shall file a claim with the Department of General Services, which shall determine the validity of the claim and pay that person a pro rata share based on the relative amounts of fees paid under the local coastal program or any agreement or contract entered pursuant thereto.

(2) There is hereby appropriated to the Department of General Services the fees referred to in subdivision (c), for the purpose of making refunds under this section.

(e) Notwithstanding any geographical limitation contained in this division, funds deposited pursuant to subdivision (b) may be expended for physical or institutional development improvements needed to facilitate long-term agricultural production within the City of Carlsbad. These funds may be used to construct improvements outside the coastal zone boundaries in San Diego County if the improvements are not inconsistent with the Carlsbad local coastal program and the State Coastal Conservancy determines that the improvements will benefit agricultural production within the coastal zone of the City of Carlsbad.

agricultural conversion fees Carlsbad local coastal program 1985 fee regulations agricultural subsidy program developmental rights pre-1985 agreements fee reimbursement Department of General Services agricultural improvements coastal zone San Diego County improvements State Coastal Conservancy agriculture production benefits fee claim process agricultural development funds

(Amended by Stats. 2016, Ch. 31, Sec. 272. (SB 836) Effective June 27, 2016.)

Section § 30171.5

If you're developing on nonprime agricultural land in Carlsbad's coastal zone, you need to pay a mitigation fee between $5,000 and $10,000 per acre. This fee goes to the State Coastal Conservancy Fund.

The collected fees are used in priority order: first to restore wildlife and habitats at Batiquitos Lagoon, next for an interpretive center at Buena Vista Lagoon, then public beach access in Carlsbad, and finally other local projects benefiting natural resources.

A special account within the fund may be used to hold these fees, and interest earned will be used similarly. At least 50% of the fees must go to Batiquitos Lagoon restoration.

The fees are specifically for mitigating agricultural conversion impacts and cannot be used to make a project compliant with existing laws or fix inconsistencies.

(a) The amount of the mitigation fee for development on nonprime agricultural lands in the coastal zone in the City of Carlsbad that lie outside of the areas described in subdivision (f) of Section 30170 and subdivision (b) of Section 30171 shall be determined in the applicable segment of the local coastal program of the City of Carlsbad, but shall not be less than five thousand dollars ($5,000), nor more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000), per acre. All mitigation fees collected under this section shall be deposited in the State Coastal Conservancy Fund.

(b) All mitigation fees collected pursuant to this section are hereby appropriated to, and shall be expended by, the State Coastal Conservancy in the following order of priority:

(1) Restoration of natural resources and wildlife habitat in Batiquitos Lagoon.

(2) Development of an interpretive center at Buena Vista Lagoon.

(3) Provision of access to public beaches in the City of Carlsbad.

(4) Any other project or activity benefiting or enhancing the use of natural resources, including open field cultivated floriculture, in the coastal zone in the City of Carlsbad that is provided for in the local coastal program of the City of Carlsbad.

(c) The State Coastal Conservancy may establish a special account in the State Coastal Conservancy Fund and deposit mitigation fees collected pursuant to this section in the special account. Any interest accruing on that money in the special account shall be expended pursuant to subdivision (b).

(d) Not less than 50 percent of collected and bonded mitigation fees shall be expended for the purpose specified in paragraph (1) of subdivision (b).

(e) Other than to mitigate the agricultural conversion impacts for which they are collected, none of the mitigation fees collected pursuant to this section shall be used for elements of a project which cause that project to be in compliance with this division or to mitigate a project which would otherwise be inconsistent with this division. When reviewing a potential project for consistency with this subdivision, the State Coastal Conservancy shall consult with the commission.

mitigation fee nonprime agricultural land coastal zone Carlsbad Batiquitos Lagoon restoration Buena Vista Lagoon public beach access natural resource projects State Coastal Conservancy Fund agricultural conversion impacts local coastal program special account wildlife habitat interpretive center open field cultivated floriculture

(Amended by Stats. 1996, Ch. 513, Sec. 2. Effective January 1, 1997.)

Section § 30172

This law section involves a specific area in San Diego County near Palomar Airport that is set to be excluded from the coastal zone. This exclusion will happen only after the City of Carlsbad's engineer approves and the relevant commission certifies a drainage plan for the area. The City of Carlsbad is responsible for implementing and enforcing this plan under the commission's interim permit authority.

In the San Diego County, an area consisting of approximately 180 acres lying west and south of Palomar Airport as shown on Map 155, which has been placed on file with the Secretary of State on April 22, 1980, shall be excluded from the coastal zone after the City Engineer of the City of Carlsbad approves and the commission certifies a drainage plan for the area, pursuant to the commission’s interim permit authority, which plan the city shall implement and enforce.

San Diego County Palomar Airport coastal zone exclusion drainage plan approval City Engineer of Carlsbad commission certification interim permit authority implementation enforcement Map 155 coastal zone regulations urban planning certified plans land management Carlsbad

(Added by Stats. 1980, Ch. 170, Sec. 4. Effective June 12, 1980.)

Section § 30174

This statute updates the map that defines the boundary of a coastal zone in San Diego County, California. It specifically changes the inland boundary of the coastal zone as originally shown on a map from 1977. The changes include removing about 250 acres near Del Mar Heights Road and the San Diego Freeway and adding roughly 45 acres near Carmel Valley Road and the San Diego Freeway. Additionally, the boundary near the south branch of Los Penasquitos Canyon is moved closer to the ocean.

Notwithstanding the maps adopted pursuant to Section 17 of Chapter 1330 of the Statutes of 1976, as amended by Section 29 of Chapter 1331 of the Statutes of 1976, the inland boundary of the coastal zone, as shown on detailed coastal map 157 adopted by the commission on March 1, 1977, shall be amended to conform to the inland boundary shown on map A which is hereby adopted by reference and which shall be filed in the office of the Secretary of State and the commission on the date of enactment of this section.

The areas deleted and added to the coastal zone which are specifically shown on map A are in the County of San Diego and are generally described as follows:

(a) In the vicinity of the intersection of Del Mar Heights Road and the San Diego Freeway, approximately 250 acres are excluded as specifically shown on map A.

(b) In the vicinity of the intersection of Carmel Valley Road and the San Diego Freeway, approximately 45 acres are added as specifically shown on map A.

(c) Near the head of the south branch of Los Penasquitos Canyon, the boundary is moved seaward to the five-mile limit as described in Section 30103 and as specifically shown on map A.

San Diego coastal zone boundary map A Del Mar Heights Road San Diego Freeway Los Penasquitos Canyon coastal zone amendments Carmel Valley Road boundary adjustment inland boundary change including and excluding areas coastal commission map Area changes near freeways 1977 coastal map update real estate boundary amendment to coastal zone

(Added by Stats. 1979, Ch. 1128.)

Struggling to fill out your Divorce Forms?

California Coastal Act

Chapter 2.5Revisions to the Coastal Zone Boundary

Section § 30150

Section § 30152

Section § 30154

Section § 30156

Section § 30156.1

Section § 30158

Section § 30160

Section § 30162

Section § 30164

Section § 30166

Section § 30166.5

Section § 30168

Section § 30169

Section § 30170

Section § 30170.6

Section § 30171

Section § 30171.2

Section § 30171.5

Section § 30172

Section § 30174

Struggling to fill out your Divorce Forms?

COMPANY

WHAT YOU CAN DO

RESOURCES

FOLLOW US

ARTICLES