Chapter 8Seizure and Disposition
Section § 11469
This law sets guidelines for how law enforcement should handle the seizure and forfeiture of property. It emphasizes that the goal is to support law enforcement, not to generate revenue, and ensures that this process doesn't affect investigations or citizen rights. Officers' performance, employment, or pay should not be tied to the amount of property seized or forfeited.
Prosecutors are encouraged to pursue criminal charges related to the activities leading to forfeiture. Agencies need a detailed manual on the procedures, including notifying owners, handling claims of innocent ownership, and swiftly resolving these claims. Ongoing training for officers handling forfeitures is required.
Agencies should avoid any conflicts of interest in managing forfeited property and are prohibited from using it for their own operations. Proceeds from forfeiture must be managed in separate, carefully audited accounts. The preservation of seized property’s value is critical, and care must be taken to protect the rights of innocent property owners and ensure due process, supporting the law’s purpose to dismantle illegal drug operations.
Section § 11470
This law outlines what can be taken away, or forfeited, by the government when tied to illegal drug activities. It includes drugs made, distributed, or acquired unlawfully. The law also targets any materials or equipment used in the manufacturing or trafficking of drugs, and containers or property used in these illegal activities, except real estate, boats, aircraft, or certain vehicles.
Financial assets like money, securities, or other values involved in illegal drug deals or intended for such use can also be seized. If a property owner commits certain drug crimes on their property, that property may be seized, unless it's a family residence or owned by someone not aware of the illegal use. When someone is proven to have violated specific drug laws, their personal property rights transfer to the state. However, people who bought property innocently from someone guilty might still keep their property.
Section § 11470.1
This law allows the government to recover costs associated with handling illegal drugs and their production. If someone is involved in making or growing illegal drugs, they may have to pay for the expenses of cleaning up or destroying these substances. Even if they're helping or benefiting from such actions on their property, they can still be liable.
The government does not need a criminal conviction before seeking recovery of these costs, but any ongoing criminal charges can delay the process. Prosecuting authorities, like district attorneys, can file these claims, and recovered costs go back to law enforcement. The law sets specific requirements for what costs can be claimed, such as being directly linked to the illegal activity and reasonably spent.
If you're found guilty of drug-related crimes, it's assumed you're responsible for these costs. In cases tied to legal proceedings, statements made by the accused can't be used in criminal trials. The law also prohibits such claims against someone acquitted of related criminal charges. Lastly, it emphasizes that civil actions for recovery costs supplement, not replace, criminal charges.
Section § 11470.2
This law allows a prosecuting attorney to seek recovery of law enforcement expenses from someone convicted of manufacturing or cultivating controlled substances. Instead of a separate civil lawsuit, these expenses can be pursued during the criminal trial.
The expenses are sought from those who make or help make these substances illegally, and the court can enforce this as a civil judgment. If convicted, the defendant might need to cover these expenses as part of their probation.
Expense recovery procedures involve filing a petition in court, and if the defendant admits to the petition, the court orders them to pay up. If the defendant denies the claim, a hearing is conducted to resolve it. In such hearings, the prosecutor must provide strong evidence to win the case. Additionally, these judgments against a defendant are treated very seriously in bankruptcy cases, similar to debts from intentional harm to others or their property.
Section § 11470.3
This law states that property owned or possessed by minors can be subject to forfeiture, just like similar property owned by adults. If a minor is involved, the same procedures for property forfeiture apply. However, if there's an ongoing juvenile court case under Section 602 of the Welfare and Institutions Code related to the same issue, the forfeiture proceedings must wait until the court makes a decision on that case. Importantly, forfeiture hearings should not take place in juvenile court.
Section § 11470.4
This law applies to minors who have been found guilty under certain sections of the Welfare and Institutions Code. It covers specific drug-related offenses, such as the sale, distribution, or manufacturing of controlled substances. If a minor violates these specific drug laws, the rules and consequences outlined in this chapter will be applicable to them.
Section § 11471
This law allows peace officers to seize property if it's subject to forfeiture. Usually, they must have a court order, but there are exceptions. No court order is needed if the seizure is part of an arrest or search warrant, if the property was already forfeited in a past case, is dangerous, or was used in a crime. For real estate, a special hearing is required to ensure seizure is necessary before trial. If business records are seized, copies must be provided upon request. In court, the prosecution must prove valid reasons to keep the property while the case is ongoing.
Section § 11471.2
This California law states that local or state law enforcement cannot hand over seized property to federal agencies for them to handle under federal forfeiture laws, except when the two are working together in joint investigations. When they do collaborate, law enforcement can only receive part of the forfeited property if the suspect is convicted of a related crime. However, if the forfeited assets are worth at least $40,000, they can still receive a share, even without a conviction. Additionally, if the suspect skips court, runs away, or dies, a conviction isn't necessary for California law enforcement to get their share of the forfeited assets.
Section § 11471.5
If a peace officer takes possession of property under Section 11471, and there's a good reason to think that the property's worth is over $5,000, they must alert the Franchise Tax Board about it.
Section § 11472
If someone has illegal drugs or tools for using them, a police officer can take those items away. A search warrant can be issued to help with this seizure, following legal procedures.
Section § 11473
When items are seized under this chapter (excluding vehicles, boats, airplanes, money, or valuable items), they must be destroyed if the owner or defendant is convicted. But, law enforcement can ask the court to donate clean science equipment to a school instead of destroying it.
Section § 11473.5
This law states that any controlled substances or related tools seized by officials, which are found property or part of cases not ending in conviction, must be destroyed by court order unless they were lawfully possessed.
If it turns out that the items were not lawfully possessed, law enforcement can ask the court to allow certain clean instruments or paraphernalia to be given to schools for science education instead of being destroyed.
Section § 11474
This section allows certain agencies, like police or specific departments, to carry out a court order for destroying illegal drugs, related equipment, or paraphernalia. The court order must state which agency is responsible for this task. If these items aren't already with the designated agency, they should be delivered there to be destroyed according to the court's instructions.
Section § 11475
If someone has, sells, or offers for sale illegal drugs that are in Schedule I, those drugs can be taken by the state without any court procedures. If the state finds or takes these drugs and can't find who owns them, they are automatically kept by the state as well.
Section § 11476
This law states that if plants capable of producing highly regulated drugs are grown illegally, unknown who planted them, or they grow wild, they can be taken by the state without going through a legal process.
Section § 11477
If a peace officer asks the person in charge of land where certain plants are growing or stored to show their registration or proof of it, and the person can't do so, the officer can seize and confiscate the plants.
Section § 11478
This law allows the Attorney General to supply cannabis to research projects that have been registered and approved. The person in charge of the research must personally sign for the cannabis and keep track of how it is used. All records are maintained by the Attorney General. Additionally, the researcher must regularly update the research advisory panel on the status or findings of their study.
Section § 11479
Law enforcement can destroy large amounts of certain controlled substances without a court order if they meet specific requirements. More than 10 pounds of substances, or over two pounds of cannabis, can be cleared if samples are saved for evidence.
Photos, videos, and weight measurements must be taken before destruction. It must be unreasonable to store or transport these substances elsewhere.
After destruction, an affidavit detailing the evidence and process must be filed in court within 30 days. This ensures a record is maintained for any potential legal proceedings.
Section § 11479.1
This law allows law enforcement to destroy certain amounts of phencyclidine (PCP), a powerful drug, without needing a court order. Before destruction, specific tasks must be completed: samples are taken, photographs are snapped to show the full amount, and the total weight is recorded. After destruction, they must file an affidavit in court within 30 days, detailing the destruction process and relevant information, especially if there are pending legal cases related to the substance. If no legal proceedings are ongoing, the affidavit can be filed in the applicable county court.
Section § 11479.2
This law allows police to destroy suspected controlled substances, except cannabis, over 57 grams, after meeting certain conditions. Before destruction, five samples must be taken, photos are needed, the total weight must be determined, and a chemical analysis is required for cocaine or methamphetamine. The police must file a motion in court, and the defendant can request a hearing within 20 days. If the court agrees and finds no harm to the defendant, the destruction can proceed, with sufficient samples retained for possible future analysis. A delay before destruction may be given for defense analysis. An affidavit must be filed after destruction. This does not cover hazardous chemicals or mixtures with them.
Section § 11479.5
This law allows law enforcement agencies to dispose of seized hazardous chemicals, their containers, or items contaminated with hazardous substances used in illegal drug manufacturing, without needing a court order if certain conditions are met.
However, before disposal, they must collect and preserve at least a one-ounce sample, photograph the substances, determine the weight or volume, and take photos showing the sizes of containers or items.
After the disposal, they must keep records of compliance and describe the location and time of disposal. If a combination of hazardous chemical and controlled substance is destroyed, an affidavit must be filed in court within 30 days, detailing compliance if a warrant was used, or during criminal proceedings if the seizure was without a warrant.
The police must also comply with state and federal laws related to hazardous waste disposal.
Section § 11480
This law establishes a Research Advisory Panel in California to promote and coordinate research on cannabis and hallucinogenic drugs. The panel is composed of members from various state departments, universities, and medical societies, appointed by their respective heads and the Governor of California.
The panel can add two special members who are doctors certified in specific fields while certain articles remain effective. Each year, the panel selects its chairperson. They can study and approve research projects related to cannabis and hallucinogenic drugs and will report annually on approved projects and findings to the legislature and the Governor.
Members serve without pay but can be reimbursed for expenses, and the panel can withdraw its approval from any research project, necessitating the return of cannabis supplies to the Attorney General.
Section § 11480.5
The Research Advisory Panel is recognized as an advisory group for certain government procedures. They must report to the Legislature by January 1, 2026, about any backlog in their work, specifically detailing how many applications have been reviewed and how many are still pending. This law will be in place until January 1, 2027, when it will be repealed.
Section § 11481
The Research Advisory Panel in California can hold hearings and study research projects related to treating controlled substance abuse. The panel is responsible for approving and monitoring these projects when they are registered with the Attorney General and can revoke approval at any time. Each year, the panel must report the details and findings of approved projects to the Legislature and the Governor.
Section § 11483
This law makes it clear that nothing in this division should be interpreted as preventing a licensed narcotic treatment program from being established and operating effectively.
Section § 11485
If the police seize personal property believed to be used for cannabis activities during a search, but no charges are filed, and the owner is unknown, the police must notify property owners or tenants about the seizure and how to reclaim it. This needs to be done via posted notice at the site and a newspaper ad. If no one claims ownership within 90 days, the property is considered abandoned. It can then be sold at auction, given to a government agency, or provided to a community service organization. Money made from the sale should go towards investigating cannabis-related crimes.
Section § 11488
This law allows California peace officers to seize property related to certain drug offenses after an arrest or attempted arrest. If the property's value exceeds $5,000, they must inform the Franchise Tax Board. People from whom property is seized should get a receipt. If no one had the property, the person at the location when it was seized gets the receipt.
Whoever receives the receipt is presumed to own the property, though this can be challenged in a forfeiture hearing.
Section § 11488.1
When property is seized under certain conditions, it can be kept if needed as evidence in a legal case. It's up to the Attorney General or the local district attorney to start and manage the legal proceedings related to the seizure.
Section § 11488.2
If a peace officer takes property but it’s not kept for evidence or is not reported for potential forfeiture, the officer must check if the Franchise Tax Board wants it held for tax issues. If not, they must return the property within 15 days. If it's a vehicle, boat, or airplane, it goes back to the registered owner.
Section § 11488.4
This law explains the procedures for seizing and forfeiting property involved in crimes. When authorities believe that the property is connected to criminal activities, they can file a petition in court to forfeit it. This petition must be filed within a year of seizing the property, and a public notice must be published. Affected individuals can challenge this forfeiture in court.
If there's a related criminal case, the forfeiture issue is decided after a criminal conviction. For higher-value properties like cash over $40,000, a different standard of evidence applies. Notices must go to anyone with a legal claim to the property.
If a person has an interest in the property but isn't the defendant, they can request its return. If a defendant does not appear in court, a criminal conviction isn't required to proceed with forfeiture. The property’s value and detailed information need to be provided, and steps for submitting a claim explained.
Section § 11488.5
In California, if the government seizes someone's property because of a related crime, the owner can file a claim in court to get it back. They have 30 days to do this after being notified. The government must prove in a hearing that the property was used knowingly for illegal activities to keep it.
If the property's value is $5,000 or less, filing the claim is free. A hearing will take place, and if the government can't prove the use of the property was illegal and the owner knew about it, the property should be returned.
For the forfeiture to proceed, there's no need for a criminal conviction. If no claim is made, the property automatically becomes state-owned. The hearing can be postponed until after any associated criminal trial, and a verdict of guilty isn't necessary for forfeiture.
Section § 11488.6
This law describes what happens when property is seized under forfeiture rules. If the property is eligible for forfeiture but someone has a valid financial stake in it, like a mortgage or lien, and they didn't know it was used for illegal activity, they have two choices. They can pay off the difference between what the property is worth and what they owe to the government to reclaim it. If they choose not to pay, the property is forfeited and can be sold at a public auction. The money from the sale goes to cover those interests first, as laid out in another law.
Section § 11489
This section explains how money from property that the state or local government seizes and sells should be distributed. First, any bona fide or innocent purchaser gets their fair share. Then, remaining funds are divided: costs of sale and processing go to the entity that handled these actions. The rest is split: 65% goes to law enforcement agencies involved in the seizure; 10% to the office that handled the legal case; 24% to California's General Fund, partially for school safety; and 1% for environmental law enforcement training. The process aims to support drug prevention and law enforcement without replacing existing funding.
Section § 11490
This law states that rules for taking away vehicles, boats, or airplanes under certain circumstances don't apply to companies that transport goods or passengers, like airlines or shipping companies. It also doesn't apply to employees doing their jobs according to this law.
Section § 11491
This section clarifies that nothing in the current legal chapter is meant to alter or reinterpret existing judicial decisions related to search and seizure laws.
Section § 11492
This law allows a prosecuting agency to ask the court for certain orders to protect property that might be seized through forfeiture. Before or after filing a forfeiture petition, they can request an injunction to stop anyone from selling or altering the property, appoint a person to manage the property, or order the property to be sold if it's at risk of losing value. These actions ensure that the value or status of the property stays the same during legal proceedings.
Before these orders are granted, the interested parties must be notified and a court hearing held to confirm the orders are necessary, except for temporary restraining orders, which can be made immediately under certain conditions. Additionally, the court might require a financial guarantee to protect the parties' interests.
Section § 11493
This law sets up a special fund called the Narcotics Assistance and Relinquishment by Criminal Offender Fund, which is part of the state's General Fund. An advisory committee, appointed by the Attorney General and consisting of law enforcement officials and one private citizen, will manage this fund.
Funds can be distributed to local and state law enforcement agencies to support efforts against drug-related crimes, but only when the state legislature approves the distribution.
Section § 11494
This law states that for any property seized or forfeiture case started before January 1, 1994, the rules for handling and distributing that property are based on the laws that were in place as of December 31, 1993. It doesn't matter if those laws have since changed; the old rules still apply to these specific cases.
Section § 11495
This law section explains the handling and reporting of funds law enforcement receives from asset forfeitures. These funds are stored and recorded by the Controller, county auditor, or city treasurer and are publicly accessible. Audits can be required by local governing bodies, and annually, the Attorney General must report detailed information about forfeiture cases, including case numbers, charges, results, and the value of forfeited assets. The Attorney General also sets guidelines for collecting and sharing this information, and this report is due by July 1 each year.