Taking And Possessing In General - - CA Fish And Game

Section § 2000

This law makes it illegal to catch or capture any bird, mammal, fish, reptile, or amphibian unless allowed by specific regulations or codes. If you're found in possession of any parts from these animals while in California's wild areas or coming back with hunting gear, it's assumed that you hunted or caught them.

(a) It is unlawful to take a bird, mammal, fish, reptile, or amphibian except as provided in this code or in a regulation adopted pursuant to this code.

(b) Possession of a bird, mammal, fish, reptile, amphibian, or part of any of those animals, in or on the fields, forests, or waters of this state, or while returning therefrom with fishing or hunting equipment, is prima facie evidence the possessor took the bird, mammal, fish, reptile, or amphibian, or part of that animal.

taking wildlife illegally wildlife possession evidence hunting regulations fishing regulations wildlife parts possession California wildlife law prima facie evidence wildlife capture illegal hunting illegal fishing reptile possession amphibian possession wildlife regulations

(Amended by Stats. 2015, Ch. 154, Sec. 41. (AB 1527) Effective January 1, 2016.)

Section § 2000.3

This section explains that the terms "roadway" and "vehicle" used in this chapter mean exactly what they do in two specific sections of the Vehicle Code. "Roadway" is defined in Section 530 and "vehicle" in Section 670. It ensures consistency in how these terms are understood across different legal contexts.

(a) As used in this chapter, “roadway” has the same meaning as defined in Section 530 of the Vehicle Code.

(b) As used in this chapter, “vehicle” has the same meaning as defined in Section 670 of the Vehicle Code.

roadway definition vehicle definition Vehicle Code cross-reference Section 530 Section 670 consistent terminology legal definitions Chapter terminology clarifying terms Vehicle Code integration

(Added by Stats. 2019, Ch. 869, Sec. 4. (SB 395) Effective January 1, 2020.)

Section § 2000.5

If you accidentally hit a bird, mammal, reptile, or amphibian with your vehicle while driving on a road, it's not considered a legal violation according to this law. However, you're not allowed to keep the animal. State or local agencies can remove the animals from the road. This rule does not apply to certain protections under a different set of laws starting with Section 2050.

(a) Notwithstanding Section 219, 2000, or any other law, and notwithstanding any requirement for a permit or license or other entitlement to take a species, the accidental taking of a bird, mammal, reptile, or amphibian by collision with a vehicle while that vehicle is being operated on a roadway is not a violation of this code or a regulation adopted pursuant to this code. Nothing in this section authorizes a person to possess any bird, mammal, reptile, or amphibian accidentally taken by collision with a vehicle as provided in this subdivision. Animals accidentally taken on a roadway may be removed by the state or local agency having jurisdiction over the roadway.

(b) This section does not apply to Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 2050).

accidental wildlife collision roadkill removal vehicle and wildlife no violation for accidental take prohibited possession of roadkill state or local agency jurisdiction wildlife vehicle collision Section 2050 exemption non-applicability to Chapter 1.5 wildlife on roadways

(Amended by Stats. 2019, Ch. 869, Sec. 5. (SB 395) Effective January 1, 2020.)

Section § 2000.6

This law allows for a pilot program where people can obtain free wildlife salvage permits online to collect certain animals (deer, elk, pronghorn antelope, wild pig) accidentally killed by vehicles on California roads for meat consumption. The process involves reporting details about the animal and accident through a web portal. This does not permit killing injured animals unless done by an authorized person. The state isn't responsible for risks involved in salvaging. The program aims to start by January 2022 and runs until January 2029, excluding endangered and certain protected species from salvage.

(a)

(1) Consistent with Section 91.8 of the Streets and Highways Code, the commission may establish a pilot program for the issuance of wildlife salvage permits through a user-friendly and cell-phone-friendly web-based portal to persons desiring to recover, possess, use, or transport, for purposes of salvaging wild game meat for human consumption of, any deer, elk, pronghorn antelope, or wild pig that has been accidentally killed as a result of a vehicle collision on a roadway within California. This permitting process shall be available at no cost to the public.

(2) In developing the pilot program, the commission shall consult with the department, the Department of Transportation, the Department of the California Highway Patrol, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, other relevant public entities, and stakeholders to ensure public health and safety and to ensure the pilot program does not facilitate poaching.

(3) The commission shall prescribe the requirements for applying for and receiving a wildlife salvage permit and set the terms and conditions it deems necessary for the safe recovery, possession, use, and transportation of deer, elk, pronghorn antelope, or wild pig pursuant to a wildlife salvage permit.

(4) The commission shall require a person seeking to obtain a wildlife salvage permit to report through the web-based portal described in paragraph (1), at a minimum, the location, type, and description of the animal salvaged, the date and time of salvage, the basic characteristics of the incident and a description of the vehicle involved, where applicable, and the destination where the carcass will be transported.

(5) The commission may limit the implementation of the pilot program only to certain counties or regions of the state.

(6) The commission may restrict the roadways where wildlife salvage may be conducted and the species subject to salvage, and may regulate any other aspect of the pilot program necessary to ensure the pilot program’s success, to minimize risks to public safety, and to prevent poaching.

(7) A person desiring to salvage the carcass of an animal pursuant to this section shall do so in a manner consistent with Section 21718 of the Vehicle Code.

(8) The commission shall consider and recommend to the department public education and outreach for the wildlife salvage pilot program beyond traditional hunting populations to the general public.

(b) Notwithstanding Section 2000.5, if a person unintentionally strikes and kills a deer, elk, pronghorn antelope, or wild pig on a roadway in California with a vehicle, that person may recover, possess, use, or transport the whole animal and salvage the edible portions of the animal pursuant to a wildlife salvage permit.

(c) Subdivision (b) shall also apply to an individual who encounters an unintentionally killed deer, elk, pronghorn antelope, or wild pig that has been struck with a vehicle.

(d) This section does not authorize an individual to kill an injured or wounded animal for the purpose of salvage. An animal that is severely injured in an accidental vehicle collision may only be salvaged pursuant to this section if it is subsequently killed by the department pursuant to Section 1001 or a law enforcement officer authorized by the department to kill injured wildlife.

(e)

(1) Upon appropriation by the Legislature, the commission may establish the wildlife salvage pilot program no later than January 1, 2022.

(2) Upon appropriation by the Legislature, the department shall implement the pilot program no later than six months after the commission establishes the pilot program.

(3)

(A) To the extent feasible, the department shall develop and make available to the public the web-based portal described in subdivision (a) for the wildlife salvage pilot program to facilitate participation in the pilot program.

(B) To the extent practicable, the web-based portal shall work with the existing harvest reporting system in use by the department, including identification of the person salvaging the animal.

(C) The department shall work to include data collected from the wildlife salvage pilot program in any other wildlife-vehicle collision data collection efforts, including data collection efforts conducted pursuant to Section 1023.

(f) This section does not authorize the take of wildlife species listed pursuant to the California Endangered Species Act (Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 2050)) and Section 670.1 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, or other nongame wildlife, fully protected species, migratory birds, including, but not limited to, waterfowl, and other wildlife species not lawfully hunted.

(g) The state is not liable for any harm, injury, loss, or damage arising out of the recovery, possession, use, transport, or consumption of any wild game animal legally salvaged pursuant to this section.

(h) Beginning on the first March 1 after the department implements the pilot program, and each March 1 thereafter, the department shall make available on its internet website data that includes the number of wildlife salvage permits issued, locations of impacts, and species of wildlife.

(i) Subdivisions (b) to (d), inclusive, shall become operative when the department implements the pilot program.

(j) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2029, and as of that date is repealed.

wildlife salvage permits vehicle collision wild game meat deer elk pronghorn antelope wild pig web-based portal pilot program public health and safety poaching prevention transportation of wildlife California roads injured wildlife Department of Transportation public education outreach endangered species exclusion

(Added by Stats. 2019, Ch. 869, Sec. 6. (SB 395) Effective January 1, 2020. Repealed as of January 1, 2029, by its own provisions.)

Section § 2001

This law makes it illegal to hunt or capture animals outside of their designated seasons or to exceed the maximum number you can legally hunt or possess, known as bag or possession limits. If someone violates these rules, they can be charged under this specific law or another that details these limits.

Additionally, it’s illegal to have a fish, reptile, or amphibian unless it’s within the open season when it was captured or during the 10 days after that season ends. The usual possession rules still apply during this 10-day period.

For game birds and mammals, you can only possess them during their open season, unless another specific regulation allows otherwise.

(a) It is unlawful to take a mammal, bird, fish, reptile, or amphibian outside of an established season or to exceed a bag limit or possession limit established in this code or by a regulation adopted by the commission. Violation of an established season, bag limit, or possession limit may be charged as a violation of this section or of the specific code section or regulation that establishes the season or limit.

(b) Unless otherwise provided, it is unlawful to possess a fish, reptile, or amphibian, except during the open season where the fish, reptile, or amphibian was taken or during the 10-day period immediately following that open season. A possession limit applicable during the open season applies during that 10-day period.

(c) Except as provided in Section 3080, it is unlawful to possess a game bird or mammal except during the open season where taken.

hunting regulations seasonal limits bag limit possession limit wildlife conservation open season unlawful possession fishing restrictions reptile season amphibian season game bird possession mammal hunting rules wildlife management 10-day possession period Section 3080 exceptions

(Amended by Stats. 2015, Ch. 154, Sec. 42. (AB 1527) Effective January 1, 2016.)

Section § 2002

This law makes it illegal to have any part of a bird, mammal, fish, reptile, or amphibian if that animal was captured or obtained in a way that breaks the rules of this code or any related regulations.

It is unlawful to possess a bird, mammal, fish, reptile, amphibian, or part of any of those animals, taken in violation of this code or a regulation adopted pursuant to this code.

unlawful possession wildlife poaching illegal hunting animal parts conservation regulations wildlife protection environmental law illegal fishing reptile conservation amphibian protection mammal conservation bird conservation wildlife regulations fish protection endangered species

(Amended by Stats. 2015, Ch. 154, Sec. 43. (AB 1527) Effective January 1, 2016.)

Section § 2003

In California, you generally can't offer a prize for catching game birds, mammals, fish, reptiles, or amphibians in contests, unless you have a special permit. The Department can issue a permit for fishing contests without harming resources. Fees may be waived for youth or disabled participants if the contest teaches fishing. Frog-jumping and Pacific Ocean fishing contests are exceptions and don't need permits. Contests for game birds or mammals are allowed if prizes are under $500. For events on Department lands, prize compensation must be equal for male and female categories.

(a) Except as specified in subdivisions (b), (c), (d), and (e), it is unlawful to offer a prize or other inducement as a reward for the taking of a game bird, or the taking of any mammal, fish, reptile, or amphibian in an individual contest, tournament, or derby.

(b) The department may issue a permit to a person authorizing that person to offer a prize or other inducement as a reward for the taking of a game fish, as defined by the commission by regulation, if it finds that there would be no detriment to the resource. The permit is subject to regulations adopted by the commission. The application for the permit shall be accompanied by a fee in the amount determined by the department as necessary to cover the reasonable administrative costs incurred by the department in issuing the permit. However, the department may waive the permit fee if the contest, tournament, or derby is for persons who are under 16 years of age or have a physical or mental disability, and the primary purpose of the contest, tournament, or derby is to introduce those anglers to or educate them about fishing. All permits for which the fee is waived pursuant to this subdivision shall comply with all other requirements set forth in this section.

(c) This section does not apply to a person conducting what is generally known as a frog-jumping contest, or, in waters of the Pacific Ocean, what is generally known as a fish contest.

(d) This section does not apply to a person conducting an individual contest, tournament, or derby for the taking of a game bird or game mammal, if the total value of all prizes or other inducements is less than five hundred dollars ($500) for the individual contest, tournament, or derby.

(e)

(1) As used in this subdivision:

(A) “Event” means a competition event on lands managed by the department.

(B) “Prize compensation” includes prize or purse money, other prizes, goods, or other compensation.

(2) The department, for any event that awards prize compensation to competitors in gendered categories, shall require as a condition of a permit pursuant to this section that, for any participant level that receives prize compensation, the prize compensation for each gendered category be identical at each participant level. The department shall not approve a permit for an event that does not comply with this condition.

prize competition ban fishing contest permit youth fishing education disabled participant exemptions frog-jumping contests Pacific Ocean fish contests game bird and mammal prize limit gender equality in prize compensation permit fee waiver resource conservation in competitions sporting contest regulations state-managed lands competitions equality in sporting events administrative permit fees competition permit requirements

(Amended by Stats. 2023, Ch. 132, Sec. 32. (AB 1760) Effective January 1, 2024.)

Section § 2003.5

This law recognizes that California's fish are an important resource for recreation and food. The state encourages volunteer efforts to improve fish habitats and supports cooperation between government agencies and private groups to help with these efforts. This initiative is called the 'Adopt a Lake Program.'

(a) The Legislature finds and declares that the fish of this state are a vital, renewable resource which provides recreation, outdoor experiences, and food for many of this state’s citizens. Therefore, it is in the state’s best interests to promote volunteer private rehabilitation and improvement of fisheries, fish habitat, and resources.

(b) The Legislature declares it is the policy of this state to encourage cooperation by local, regional, state, and federal governmental agencies with jurisdiction over inland waters with private groups and associations in order to do fish habitat and restoration work. This policy shall be pursued through the implementation of a program known as the “Adopt a Lake Program.”

fish conservation volunteer rehabilitation fish habitat improvement Adopt a Lake Program fisheries resources outdoor recreation California fish government cooperation private group collaboration fish restoration inland waters habitat restoration local and regional agencies renewable resource fishery partnerships

(Added by Stats. 1988, Ch. 850, Sec. 1.)

Section § 2003.6

This law allows the department to start the "Adopt a Lake Program," where private groups can volunteer to help improve fish habitats and resources. For this program, a plan needs to be created and updated regularly by the department, the private group, and the agency controlling the lake. This plan must align with the goals of both the department and the controlling agency.

The department may implement the “Adopt a Lake Program” to facilitate private groups’ and associations’ undertaking volunteer efforts to rehabilitate and improve fisheries, fish habitat, and resources. In implementing this program, the department shall prepare and periodically update a plan for the volunteer efforts to be undertaken. The plan shall be prepared cooperatively by the department, the private group or association, and the public agency with jurisdiction over the inland water to be affected by the plan. The plan shall be consistent with the management plan and management objectives of the department and the public agency with jurisdiction over the inland water.

Adopt a Lake Program volunteer efforts fisheries improvement fish habitat rehabilitation private groups associations resource improvement inland water management plan coordination with public agency

(Added by Stats. 1988, Ch. 850, Sec. 2.)

Section § 2004

This law states that while hunting or fishing for any animals like birds, mammals, fish, reptiles, or amphibians, it's illegal to cause damage to property of any kind, such as breaking fences or leaving gates open. You also cannot injure livestock carelessly or allow such destruction to happen through negligence.

It is unlawful for any person, while taking any bird, mammal, fish, reptile, or amphibian, to cause damage, or assist in causing damage, to real or personal property, or to leave gates or bars open, or to break down, destroy, or damage fences, or to tear down or scatter piles of rails, posts, stone, or wood, or, through carelessness or negligence, to injure livestock of any kind.

wildlife hunting regulations property damage negligence livestock protection gate and fence rules wildlife taking activities property protection while hunting unlawful hunting activities environmental conservation recreational hunting restrictions fish and game regulations animal hunting ethics damage to personal property real property protection responsible hunting practices

(Amended by Stats. 1974, Ch. 605.)

Section § 2005

This California law makes it illegal to use artificial light to hunt or capture game birds, mammals, or fish, unless specific exceptions apply. It also forbids shining lights like spotlights or headlights in areas where animals are common if you have a weapon with you, regardless of whether you actually hunt the animals. Night vision equipment is also banned for hunting. However, there are exceptions, such as for ocean fishing, small handheld flashlights, and certain agricultural land activities. Additionally, hunters can't be arrested for violating this law except by a peace officer.

(a) Except as otherwise authorized by this section, it is unlawful to use an artificial light to assist in the taking of a game bird, game mammal, or game fish.

(b) It is unlawful for one or more persons to throw or cast the rays of a spotlight, headlight, or other artificial light on a highway or in a field, woodland, or forest where game mammals, fur-bearing mammals, or nongame mammals are commonly found, or upon a game mammal, fur-bearing mammal, or nongame mammal, while having in his or her possession or under his or her control a firearm or weapon with which that mammal could be killed, even though the mammal is not killed, injured, shot at, or otherwise pursued.

(c) It is unlawful to use or possess night vision equipment to assist in the taking of a bird, mammal, amphibian, reptile, or fish. For purposes of this subdivision, “night vision equipment” includes, but is not limited to, the following:

(1) An infrared or similar light, used in connection with an electronic viewing device.

(2) An optical device, including, but not limited to, binoculars or a scope, that uses electrical or battery powered light amplifying circuits.

(d) This section does not apply to any of the following:

(1) Sport fishing in ocean waters, or other waters where night fishing is permitted, if an artificial light is not used on or as part of the fishing tackle.

(2) Commercial fishing.

(3) The taking of mammals governed by Article 2 (commencing with Section 4180) of Chapter 3 of Part 3 of Division 4.

(4) The use of a hand-held flashlight that is no larger and emits no more light than a two-cell, three-volt flashlight, and is not affixed to a weapon.

(5) The use of a lamp or lantern that does not cast a directional beam of light.

(6) Headlights of a motor vehicle that are operated in a usual manner and without attempt or intent to locate a game mammal, fur-bearing mammal, or nongame mammal.

(7) An owner of land devoted to the agricultural industry, or the owner’s employee, while on that land.

(8) An owner of land devoted to the agricultural industry, or the owner’s employee, while on land controlled by the owner in connection with the agricultural industry.

(9) Other uses as the commission may authorize by regulation.

(e) A person shall not be arrested for violation of this section except by a peace officer.

artificial light usage night hunting prohibition spotlight hunting law night vision equipment ban infrared light hunting binoculars with light amplifying circuits hand-held flashlight exception ocean sport fishing exception agricultural land hunting exception peace officer arrest requirement rural property rights light restriction for hunting hunting enforcement regulations landowner hunting rights game animal protection

(Amended by Stats. 2015, Ch. 154, Sec. 45. (AB 1527) Effective January 1, 2016.)

Section § 2006

This law makes it illegal to have a loaded rifle or shotgun inside any vehicle that is parked or being driven on a public road. A gun is considered loaded if it has a live round in the firing chamber, but not if rounds are only in the magazine. However, this rule doesn't apply to police officers or military personnel when they are on duty or traveling to or from duty.

(a) It is unlawful to possess a loaded rifle or shotgun in any vehicle or conveyance or its attachments which is standing on or along or is being driven on or along any public highway or other way open to the public.

(b) A rifle or shotgun shall be deemed to be loaded for the purposes of this section when there is an unexpended cartridge or shell in the firing chamber but not when the only cartridges or shells are in the magazine.

(c) The provisions of this section shall not apply to peace officers or members of the Armed Forces of this state or the United States, while on duty or going to or returning from duty.

loaded firearm in vehicle rifle in car law shotgun in vehicle regulation public highway firearm rules loaded gun in conveyance cartridge in firing chamber law enforcement firearm exemption military firearm transport peace officers exemptions firearm regulations public road

(Amended by Stats. 2010, Ch. 178, Sec. 28. (SB 1115) Effective January 1, 2011. Operative January 1, 2012, by Sec. 107 of Ch. 178.)

Section § 2007

This law makes it illegal to set up or use a trap gun. A trap gun is a loaded firearm that is rigged to fire when triggered by a string or similar mechanism.

(a) It is unlawful to set, place, or cause to be set or placed, any trap gun.

(b) A “trap gun” is a firearm loaded with other than blank cartridges and connected with a string or other contrivance contact with which will cause the firearm to be discharged.

trap gun firearm illegal loaded firearm string mechanism triggered discharge rigged gun blank cartridges discharged firearm contrivance automated gun firearm safety spring gun gun setup prohibition California gun law

(Amended by Stats. 2023, Ch. 132, Sec. 33. (AB 1760) Effective January 1, 2024.)

Section § 2009

This section makes it illegal to intentionally interfere with someone who is lawfully engaged in activities like shooting, hunting, fishing, falconry, dog training, or trapping. If someone violates this rule, they can be punished under Section 12000, and repeated offenses within two years can lead to a misdemeanor charge, which might include jail time, a fine, or both. However, this law doesn't affect peace officers doing their jobs, nor does it affect landowners doing normal activities like farming or restricting trespassing. Interference might include actions like scaring animals away, putting up unauthorized signs or barriers, or placing bait to disrupt hunting. The person must have a specific intent to interfere to be liable under this section.

(a) A person shall not willfully interfere with the participation of any individual in the lawful activity of shooting, hunting, fishing, falconry, hunting dog field trials, hunting dog training, or trapping at the location where that activity is taking place.

(b) A violation of this section is punishable pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 12000.

(c) Any person convicted for a violation of this section that occurred within two years of a prior violation of this section which resulted in a conviction is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in the county jail for a period of not more than one year, by a fine of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) and not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by both imprisonment and fine.

(d) This section does not apply to the actions of any peace officer or personnel of the department in the performance of their official duties. This section does not obstruct the rights and normal activities of landowners or tenants, including, but not limited to, farming, ranching, and limiting unlawful trespass.

(e) In order to be liable for a violation of this section, the person is required to have had the specific intent to interfere with the participation of an individual who was engaged in lawful shooting, hunting, fishing, falconry, hunting dog field trials, hunting dog training, or trapping.

(f) For purposes of this section, “interfere with” means any action which physically impedes, hinders, or obstructs the lawful pursuit of any of the above-mentioned activities, including, but not limited to, all of the following:

(1) Actions taken for the purpose of frightening away animals from the location where the lawful activity is taking place.

(2) Placing or maintaining signs, gates, locks, or barricades that prohibit or deny access to lands without authorization from the landowner or lessee or an authorized designee of the landowner or lessee.

(3) Placing food on lands not belonging to the person placing the food for purposes of eliminating the lawful ability to hunt due to the presence of bait, as defined in this code or regulations adopted pursuant to this code.

interference with lawful hunting hunting regulations shooting interference fishing obstruction falconry training hunting dogs trapping activities misdemeanor for interference intent to interfere landowner rights unauthorized barriers bait placement peace officer exemption county jail punishment farming and ranching laws

(Amended by Stats. 2009, Ch. 394, Sec. 5. (AB 1423) Effective January 1, 2010.)

Section § 2010

This law makes it illegal to use or have a shotgun larger than a 10-gauge, or one that holds more than six cartridges at a time, for hunting mammals or birds. If a shotgun is modified with a plug to restrict its capacity, its legal capacity is determined by how many cartridges it can hold after modification.

The wildlife commission can hold a public hearing to make rules about the number of cartridges shotguns can hold, which might be stricter than what's stated here or to align with federal laws.

(a) It is unlawful to use or possess a shotgun larger than 10-gauge, or to use or possess a shotgun capable of holding more than six cartridges at one time, to take a mammal or bird.

(b) A shotgun that has been modified with the insertion of a plug is deemed, for the purpose of this section, to have a cartridge capacity equal to the number of cartridges that can be loaded into the weapon as modified.

(c) After a public hearing, the commission may adopt regulations relative to the ammunition capacity of shotguns for taking mammals or birds that are more restrictive than the limits provided in subdivision (a), or that it determines may be needed to conform to federal law.

shotgun size limit 10-gauge shotgun cartridge capacity shotgun modification plug insertion hunting regulations wildlife commission public hearing federal law conformity ammunition restrictions bird hunting mammal hunting regulatory authority weapon capacity modification

(Amended by Stats. 2015, Ch. 154, Sec. 46. (AB 1527) Effective January 1, 2016.)

Section § 2011

This law makes it illegal to harm or take away a bird or mammal that someone else already has, either physically or by having wounded it and is trying to capture it. If someone is actively pursuing an animal they've injured, it's still considered in their possession.

(a) It is unlawful for any person to take, mutilate, or destroy any bird or mammal lawfully in the possession of another.

(b) For the purpose of this section, a bird or mammal shall be deemed in possession when it is actually reduced to physical possession or when it is wounded or otherwise maimed and the person who wounded or otherwise maimed it is in hot pursuit.

take mutilate destroy bird mammal possession unlawful wounded animal hot pursuit animal rights wildlife protection animal possession physical possession maimed animal animal laws

(Amended by Stats. 2007, Ch. 285, Sec. 25. Effective January 1, 2008.)

Section § 2011.5

This law makes it illegal to remove any collar, including electronic or radio devices, from a hunting dog unless you have written permission from the dog's owner. A "hunting dog" is defined as a dog actively involved in hunting or training to hunt mammals or birds in legal hunting areas. However, this rule does not apply to law enforcement, animal control officers, or individuals helping an injured dog while performing their duties.

(a) It is unlawful for a person to remove from a hunting dog any collar, including an electronic or radio transmitting device, without possessing written permission from the dog’s owner allowing the removal of the collar.

(b) As used in this section, “hunting dog” means a dog in the field actively engaged in the taking of mammals or birds, or a dog actively being trained for the taking of mammals or birds, that is located in an area where mammals or birds can be taken, at that time and place, in accordance with existing law.

(c) This section does not apply to a law enforcement officer or an animal control officer in the performance of his or her duty, or to a person who is assisting an injured dog.

hunting dog collar removal written permission electronic device on dogs radio transmitting collar field training dogs mammals hunting birds hunting law enforcement exception animal control officers injured dog assistance unlawful collar removal hunting regulations

(Added by Stats. 2009, Ch. 294, Sec. 9. (AB 1442) Effective January 1, 2010.)

Section § 2012

In California, if you have any licenses or tags for hunting or fishing, or if you have taken any birds, mammals, fish, reptiles, or amphibians, you must show these items to officials who enforce wildlife conservation laws if they ask. This also applies to any tools or gear used for capturing these animals.

All licenses, tags, and the birds, mammals, fish, reptiles, or amphibians taken or otherwise dealt with under this code, and any device or apparatus designed to be, and capable of being, used to take birds, mammals, fish, reptiles, or amphibians shall be exhibited upon demand to any person authorized by the department to enforce this code or any law relating to the protection and conservation of birds, mammals, fish, reptiles, or amphibians.

licenses display wildlife conservation hunting tags fishing permits enforcement officials conservation laws game animals hunting equipment fishing apparatus wildlife protection enforcement demand inspect permits game taken wildlife apparatus conservation compliance

(Amended by Stats. 2007, Ch. 285, Sec. 26. Effective January 1, 2008.)

Section § 2013

This law section says that the rules about owning birds, mammals, fish, reptiles, or amphibians apply whether these animals are captured in California or somewhere else.

Unless otherwise provided, the provisions of this code relating to the possession of birds, mammals, fish, reptiles, or amphibians apply to birds, mammals, fish, reptiles, or amphibians taken either in or outside of this state.

animal possession wildlife laws out-of-state capture animal ownership rules exotic animals wildlife regulations species regulation reptile possession mammal capture bird ownership fish possession laws amphibian ownership cross-border animal laws animal regulation California wildlife

(Amended by Stats. 2015, Ch. 154, Sec. 47. (AB 1527) Effective January 1, 2016.)

Section § 2014

California aims to protect its natural resources, including birds, mammals, fish, reptiles, or amphibians, from illegal or careless harm. The state can sue someone who unlawfully or negligently harms these creatures. If the case goes to court, damages will be proportional to the harm caused. Legal actions must be filed in the county where the harm occurred, and the State Water Resources Control Board might get involved if water pollution is related.

Exceptions to this law include actions taken for agricultural pest control, fish destruction in irrigation, or lawful elimination of animals damaging crops. If a local agency is already punished under water-related laws, they can't face further damages under this section for the same incident. Money recovered from such suits is directed to the Fish and Wildlife Pollution Account. 'Local agency' refers to any governmental body like a city or county.

(a) It is the policy of this state to conserve its natural resources and to prevent the willful or negligent destruction of birds, mammals, fish, reptiles, or amphibia.

(b) The state may recover damages in a civil action against any person or local agency which unlawfully or negligently takes or destroys any bird, mammal, fish, reptile, or amphibian protected by the laws of this state.

(c) The measure of damages is the amount that will compensate for all the detriment proximately caused by the taking or destruction of the birds, mammals, fish, reptiles, or amphibia.

(d) An action to recover damages under this section shall be brought in the name of the people of the state, in a court of competent jurisdiction in the county in which the cause of action arose. The State Water Resources Control Board shall be notified of, and may join in, any action brought under this section when the activities alleged to have caused the destruction of any bird, mammal, fish, reptile, or amphibian may involve either the unlawful discharge of pollutants into the waters of the state or other violation of Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the Water Code.

(e) This section does not apply to any of the following:

(1) Persons or local agencies engaged in agricultural pest control.

(2) The destruction of fish in irrigation canals or works, or irrigation drainages.

(3) The lawful destruction of a bird or mammal killed while damaging crops.

(f) No damages may be recovered against a local agency pursuant to this section if civil or administrative penalties are assessed against the local agency for the same detriment pursuant to Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the Water Code.

(g) Any recovery or settlement of money damages, including, but not limited to, civil penalties, arising out of any civil action filed and maintained by the Attorney General in the enforcement of this section shall be deposited by the department in the subaccounts of the Fish and Wildlife Pollution Account in the Fish and Game Preservation Fund as specified in Section 13011.

(h) For purposes of this section, “local agency” includes any city, county, city and county, district, public authority, or other political subdivision.

natural resource protection wildlife conservation unlawful harm to wildlife negligent destruction civil action compensatory damages State Water Resources Control Board water pollution exemptions agricultural pest control irrigation fish destruction crop damage exception Fish and Wildlife Pollution Account monetary recovery local agency definition

(Amended by Stats. 2023, Ch. 132, Sec. 34. (AB 1760) Effective January 1, 2024.)

Section § 2015

In California, it's generally illegal for restaurants or eateries to have birds, mammals, fish, amphibians, or reptiles that can't be sold legally. However, there are some exceptions. If someone legally caught or possessed the animal, or if they're preparing it for the person who legally caught it, the law doesn't apply. Additionally, if the animal has a tag with the name, address, date, and type of animal taken from the person who caught it, it's allowed. This law mainly seeks to regulate the possession of certain animals in eating places.

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, it is unlawful to possess a bird, mammal, fish, amphibian, or reptile, that may not be legally sold, in a restaurant or other eating establishment.

(b) This section does not apply to any of the following:

(1) A person who lawfully took or otherwise legally possessed the bird, mammal, fish, amphibian, or reptile.

(2) A person preparing the bird, mammal, fish, amphibian, or reptile for consumption by the person who lawfully took or possessed it, or by that person and others, if the person who took or possessed it is present on the premises.

(3) A bird, mammal, fish, amphibian, or reptile tagged with a signed statement of the person who took the bird, mammal, fish, amphibian, or reptile stating that person’s name and address, the date taken, and the total number and kind taken.

unlawful possession restaurant regulations eating establishments legal possession exceptions wildlife consumption animal tagging possession exceptions lawful hunting wildlife preparation wildlife possession laws wildlife sale restrictions animal consumption laws tagged wildlife eating establishment laws

(Amended by Stats. 2015, Ch. 154, Sec. 48. (AB 1527) Effective January 1, 2016.)

Section § 2016

This law makes it illegal to enter someone else's land to shoot a firearm or hunt animals and birds, including waterfowl, without written permission from the landowner or their representative. This rule applies if the land is either farmed or fenced, or if there are signs posted along the boundaries and entry points warning against trespassing or hunting. These signs must be placed frequently, at least three per mile. However, this law does not limit the public's right to use navigable waters for hunting, fishing, or other public purposes, as protected by the state constitution.

(a) It is unlawful to enter land for the purpose of discharging a firearm or taking or destroying a mammal or bird, including waterfowl, on that land, without having first obtained written permission from the owner, the owner’s agent, or the person in lawful possession of that land, if either of the following is true:

(1) The land belongs to, or is occupied by, another person and is either under cultivation or enclosed by a fence.

(2) There are signs of any size and wording forbidding trespass or hunting or both displayed along all exterior boundaries of the land, at intervals not less than three to the mile, and at all roads and trails entering the land, including land temporarily inundated by non-navigable waters flowing outside the established banks of a river, stream, slough, or other waterway, which fairly advise a person about to enter the land that the use of the land is so restricted.

(b) Nothing in this section restricts the right of the public to use navigable waters for hunting, fishing, or other public purpose as guaranteed under Section IV of Article X of the California Constitution.

trespassing hunting permission discharging firearm written permission private land landowner consent cultivated land fenced land trespass signs hunting restrictions navigable waters public access wildlife hunting land access laws firearm restrictions

(Amended by Stats. 2024, Ch. 186, Sec. 1. (SB 1226) Effective January 1, 2025.)

Section § 2018

This law makes it illegal to put up signs that claim an area is a state or federal refuge unless the area is officially recognized as such by law. It also prohibits anyone from posting signs that ban trespassing or hunting on land unless they have the permission of the land's owner or legal possessor. Additionally, it is illegal to destroy or damage any signs that are put up to prohibit hunting or trespassing.

It is unlawful to post any sign indicating an area is a state or federal refuge unless it is established by state or federal law, or to post any sign prohibiting trespass or hunting on any land unless authorized by the owner or the person in lawful possession of such lands.

It is unlawful for any person to maliciously tear down, mutilate, or destroy any sign, signboard or other notice forbidding hunting or trespass on land.

illegal signage state refuge signs federal refuge signs trespass prohibition signs hunting prohibition signs landowner permission land possession rights sign destruction sign mutilation notice destruction signposting authorization unlawful posting hunting regulations trespassing laws malicious destruction of signs

(Added by Stats. 1967, Ch. 1187.)

Section § 2019

This law makes it illegal for anyone, including government officials or their representatives, to offer or pay a reward for capturing or killing birds or mammals. However, this does not apply to people hunting these animals on their own private land.

It is unlawful for any person, including state, federal, county, and city officials or their agents, to authorize, offer or pay a bounty for any bird or mammal. This section does not apply to any person with respect to the taking of any bird or mammal on the private property of such person.

illegal bounty bird hunting prohibition mammal capture reward ban government officials animal rights private property exception wildlife protection bounty prohibition hunting laws state official restrictions federal official restrictions city official restrictions county official restrictions animal conservation

(Added by Stats. 1974, Ch. 25.)

Section § 2020

This law makes it illegal to break any rules found in Division 1 of Title 14 in the California Code of Regulations. If someone breaks these rules, they can be charged either under this law or under the specific rule they broke. The penalties for this will be determined by what is outlined in Section 12000.

It is unlawful to violate any provision of Division 1 (commencing with Section 1.04) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. Violation of such a provision may be charged as a violation of this section or of the specific section of Title 14 provision, and shall be punishable as provided in Section 12000.

unlawful provision violation Division 1 Title 14 California Code of Regulations violation charges Section 12000 penalties illegal regulations punishable provisions California wildlife regulations Title 14 rules Divisional violation charged offenses state regulations violation environmental compliance regulatory offenses

(Added by Stats. 2009, Ch. 294, Sec. 10. (AB 1442) Effective January 1, 2010.)

Section § 2021

This law makes it illegal for most people to possess, sell, trade, or distribute shark fins in California. However, there are exceptions for those who have a specific license or permit. If someone has a permit according to Section 1002, they can have shark fins as long as it aligns with the rules of their permit. Similarly, those who hold a license or permit for taking or landing sharks for recreational or commercial purposes can possess shark fins if it fits within their permit's guidelines.

(a) As used in this section “shark fin” means the raw, dried, or otherwise processed detached fin, or the raw, dried, or otherwise processed detached tail, of an elasmobranch.

(b) Except as otherwise provided in subdivisions (c) and (d), it shall be unlawful for any person to possess, sell, offer for sale, trade, or distribute a shark fin.

(c) Any person who holds a license or permit pursuant to Section 1002 may possess a shark fin or fins consistent with that license or permit.

(d) Any person who holds a license or permit issued by the department to take or land sharks for recreational or commercial purposes may possess a shark fin or fins consistent with that license or permit.

shark fin possession shark fin trade shark fin sale elasmobranch fins shark conservation wildlife regulation license or permit requirements Section 1002 recreational shark fishing commercial shark fishing shark fin distribution fishing permits California shark law wildlife protection

(Amended by Stats. 2023, Ch. 132, Sec. 35. (AB 1760) Effective January 1, 2024.)

Section § 2021.5

This law clarifies exceptions related to the possession and use of shark fins in California. It allows licensed individuals to possess, consume, or donate shark fins, as long as it aligns with their permit for taking or landing sharks. Selling or possessing shark parts for taxidermy is also allowed. Additionally, the Ocean Protection Council must report annually on shark species certified as sustainable seafood.

(a) Notwithstanding Section 2021, all of the following provisions apply:

(1) Any person who holds a license or permit issued by the department to take or land sharks for recreational or commercial purposes may possess, including for purposes of consumption or taxidermy, or may donate to a person licensed or permitted pursuant to Section 1002, a shark fin or fins consistent with that license or permit.

(2) Nothing in Section 2021 prohibits the sale or possession of a shark carcass, skin, or fin for taxidermy purposes pursuant to Section 3087.

(b)

(1) The Ocean Protection Council shall submit an annual report to the Legislature that lists any shark species that have been independently certified to meet internationally accepted standards for sustainable seafood, as defined in Section 35550 of the Public Resources Code, and adopted by the Ocean Protection Council pursuant to Section 35617 of the Public Resources Code, including chain of custody standards.

(2) A report to be submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.

shark fins license permit recreational fishing commercial fishing taxidermy sustainable seafood Ocean Protection Council shark species consumption donation taxidermy purposes chain of custody standards annual report

(Amended by Stats. 2023, Ch. 132, Sec. 36. (AB 1760) Effective January 1, 2024.)

Section § 2022

This section makes it illegal to buy, sell, or possess with the intent to sell ivory or rhinoceros horn in California, unless certain exceptions apply, like items part of musical instruments or antiques with proven history. Bona fide educational or scientific institutions may also have exemptions if certain conditions are met. Anyone caught violating this law may face criminal penalties, including fines and potential jail time, depending on the value of the items involved and whether this is a first-time or subsequent offense. Violators may also be subject to administrative penalties that involve a hearing process, with fines supporting wildlife preservation efforts. Rewards may be given to informants who lead to a conviction, except those who are law enforcement officers. Any ivory or rhinoceros horn seized will be forfeited for educational use or destroyed.

(a) For the purposes of this section, the following terms have the following meanings:

(1) “Bona fide educational or scientific institution” means an institution that establishes through documentation either of the following:

(A) Educational or scientific tax exemption, from the federal Internal Revenue Service or the institution’s national, state, or local tax authority.

(B) Accreditation as an educational or scientific institution, from a qualified national, regional, state, or local authority for the institution’s location.

(2) “Ivory” means a tooth or tusk from a species of elephant, hippopotamus, mammoth, mastodon, walrus, warthog, whale, or narwhal, or a piece thereof, whether raw ivory or worked ivory, and includes a product containing, or advertised as containing, ivory.

(3) “Rhinoceros horn” means the horn, or a piece thereof, or a derivative such as powder, of a species of rhinoceros, and includes a product containing, or advertised as containing, a rhinoceros horn.

(4) “Sale” or “sell” means selling, trading, bartering for monetary or nonmonetary consideration, giving away in conjunction with a commercial transaction, or giving away at a location where a commercial transaction occurred at least once during the same or the previous calendar year.

(5) “Total value” means either the fair market value or the actual price paid for ivory or rhinoceros horn, whichever is greater.

(b) Except as provided in subdivision (c), it is unlawful to purchase, sell, offer for sale, possess with intent to sell, or import with intent to sell ivory or rhinoceros horn.

(c) The prohibitions set forth in subdivision (b) do not apply to any of the following:

(1) An employee or agent of the federal or state government undertaking a law enforcement activity pursuant to federal or state law, or a mandatory duty required by federal law.

(2) An activity that is authorized by an exemption or permit under federal law or that is otherwise expressly authorized under federal law.

(3) Ivory or rhinoceros horn that is part of a musical instrument, including, but not limited to, a string or wind instrument or piano, and that is less than 20 percent by volume of the instrument, if the owner or seller provides historical documentation demonstrating provenance and showing the item was manufactured no later than 1975.

(4) Ivory or rhinoceros horn that is part of a bona fide antique and that is less than five percent by volume of the antique, if the antique status is established by the owner or seller of the antique with historical documentation demonstrating provenance and showing the antique to be not less than 100 years old.

(5) The purchase, sale, offer for sale, possession with intent to sell, or importation with intent to sell ivory or rhinoceros horn for educational or scientific purposes by a bona fide educational or scientific institution if both of the following criteria are satisfied:

(A) The purchase, sale, offer for sale, possession with intent to sell, or import with intent to sell the ivory or rhinoceros horn is not prohibited by federal law.

(B) The ivory or rhinoceros horn was legally acquired before January 1, 1991, and was not subsequently transferred from one person to another for financial gain or profit after July 1, 2016.

(d) Possession of ivory or rhinoceros horn in a retail or wholesale outlet commonly used for the buying or selling of similar items is prima facie evidence of possession with intent to sell. This evidence does not preclude a finding of intent to sell based on any other evidence that may serve to establish that intent independently or in conjunction with this evidence.

(e) For a violation of any provision of this section, or any rule, regulation, or order adopted pursuant to this section, the following criminal penalties shall be imposed:

(1) For a first conviction, where the total value of the ivory or rhinoceros horn is two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or less, the offense shall be a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not less than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000), imprisonment in the county jail for not more than 30 days, or by both the fine and imprisonment.

(2) For a first conviction, where the total value of the ivory or rhinoceros horn is more than two hundred fifty dollars ($250), the offense shall be a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not less than five thousand dollars ($5,000), or more than forty thousand dollars ($40,000), imprisonment in the county jail for not more than one year, or by both the fine and imprisonment.

(3) For a second or subsequent conviction, where the total value of the ivory or rhinoceros horn is two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or less, the offense shall be a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not less than five thousand dollars ($5,000), or more than forty thousand dollars ($40,000), imprisonment in county jail for not more than one year, or by both the fine and imprisonment.

(4) For a second or subsequent conviction, where the total value of the ivory or rhinoceros horn is more than two hundred fifty dollars ($250), the offense shall be a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or more than fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) or the amount equal to two times the total value of the ivory or rhinoceros horn involved in the violation, whichever is greater, imprisonment in county jail for not more than one year, or by both the fine and imprisonment.

(f) In addition to, and separate from, any criminal penalty provided for under subdivision (e), an administrative penalty of up to ten thousand dollars ($10,000) may be imposed for a violation of any provision of this section, or any rule, regulation, or order adopted pursuant to this section. Penalties authorized pursuant to this subdivision may be imposed by the department consistent with all of the following:

(1) The chief of enforcement issues a complaint to any person or entity on which an administrative penalty may be imposed pursuant to this section. The complaint shall allege the act or failure to act that constitutes a violation, relevant facts, the provision of law authorizing the administrative penalty to be imposed, and the proposed penalty amount.

(2) The complaint and order is served by personal notice or certified mail and informs the party served that the party may request a hearing no later than 20 days from the date of service. If a hearing is requested, it shall be scheduled before the director or his or her designee, which designee shall not be the chief of enforcement issuing the complaint and order. A request for hearing shall contain a brief statement of the material facts the party claims support his or her contention that an administrative penalty should not be imposed or that an administrative penalty of a lesser amount is warranted. A party served with a complaint pursuant to this subdivision waives the right to a hearing if no hearing is requested within 20 days of service of the complaint, in which case the order imposing the administrative penalty shall become final.

(3) The director, or his or her designee, shall control the nature and order of the hearing proceedings. Hearings shall be informal in nature, and need not be conducted according to the technical rules relating to evidence. The director, or his or her designee, shall issue a final order within 45 days of the close of the hearing. A final copy of the order shall be served by certified mail upon the party served with the complaint.

(4) A party may obtain review of the final order by filing a petition for a writ of mandate with the superior court within 30 days of the date of service of the final order. The administrative penalty shall be due and payable to the department within 60 days after the time to seek judicial review has expired or, where the party has not requested a hearing of the order, within 20 days after the order imposing an administrative penalty becomes final.

(g) For any conviction or other entry of judgment imposed by a court for a violation of this section resulting in a fine, the court may pay one-half of the fine, but not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500), to any person giving information that led to the conviction or other entry of judgment. This reward shall not apply if the informant is a regular salaried law enforcement officer, or officer or agent of the department.

(h) Upon conviction or other entry of judgment for a violation of this section, any seized ivory or rhinoceros horn shall be forfeited and, upon forfeiture, either maintained by the department for educational or training purposes, donated by the department to a bona fide educational or scientific institution, or destroyed.

(i) Administrative penalties collected pursuant to this section shall be deposited in the Fish and Game Preservation Fund and used for law enforcement purposes upon appropriation by the Legislature.

(j) This section does not preclude enforcement under Section 653o of the Penal Code.

ivory trade prohibition rhinoceros horn sale wildlife trafficking penalties musical instrument exemption antique ivory exceptions educational exemptions administrative penalties fine for ivory possession Fish and Game Preservation Fund enforcement of ivory laws reward for informants forfeiture of ivory bona fide scientific institutions

(Amended by Stats. 2016, Ch. 86, Sec. 135. (SB 1171) Effective January 1, 2017.)

Section § 2023

This law bans the sale, distribution, and manufacturing of fur products in California. The rule targets products made wholly or partially from fur. Exemptions exist for used fur, religious uses, traditional tribal practices, and federally authorized activities.

Violations lead to civil fines, starting at $500 and increasing to $1,000 for repeat offenses. Separate penalties apply to each infringing item. Instead of criminal charges, civil action may be pursued, with fines funding wildlife conservation.

Record-keeping is mandated for exempt sales, but there's no criminal penalty for non-compliance with this requirement. These rules started on January 1, 2023, and any portion of the law found invalid won't affect the rest.

(a) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:

(1) “Fur” means any animal skin or part thereof with hair, fleece, or fur fibers attached thereto, either in its raw or processed state.

(2)

(A) “Fur product” means any article of clothing or covering for any part of the body, or any fashion accessory, including, but not limited to, handbags, shoes, slippers, hats, earmuffs, scarves, shawls, gloves, jewelry, keychains, toys or trinkets, and home accessories and decor, that is made in whole or in part of fur.

(B) “Fur product” does not include any of the following:

(i) A dog or cat fur product, as defined in Section 1308 of Title 19 of the United States Code, as that section read on January 1, 2020.

(ii) An animal skin or part thereof that is to be converted into leather, which in processing will have the hair, fleece, or fur fiber completely removed.

(iii) Cowhide with hair attached thereto.

(iv) Deerskin, sheepskin, or goatskin with hair attached thereto.

(v) The pelt or skin of an animal that is preserved through taxidermy.

(vi) A product made pursuant to Section 3087 or 4303.

(3) “Taxidermy” means the practice of preparing, stuffing, and mounting the skin, in lifelike form, of any fish, reptile, amphibian, bird, or mammal.

(4) “Ultimate consumer” means a person who buys for their own use, or for the use of another, but not for resale or trade.

(5) “Used fur product” means fur in any form that has been worn or used by an ultimate consumer.

(b)

(1) It is unlawful to sell, offer for sale, display for sale, trade, or otherwise distribute for monetary or nonmonetary consideration a fur product in the state.

(2) It is unlawful to manufacture a fur product in the state for sale.

(c) The prohibitions set forth in subdivision (b) do not apply to any of the following:

(1) A used fur product.

(2) A fur product used for religious purposes.

(3) A fur product used for traditional tribal, cultural, or spiritual purposes by a member of a federally recognized Native American tribe or a nonfederally recognized California Native American tribe listed on the California Tribal Consultation List maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission.

(4) Any activity expressly authorized by federal law.

(d) A person who sells or trades any used fur product or fur product described in subdivision (c) shall maintain a record of each sale or trade of one of those exempt fur products for at least one year. A person who reports the receipt or purchase of a used fur product or fur product described in subdivision (c) pursuant to Section 21628 of the Business and Professions Code shall be deemed to satisfy this subdivision. A violation of this subdivision is not subject to a criminal or civil penalty.

(e)

(1) A person who violates subdivision (b) may be subject to the following civil penalties:

(A) For the first violation and for a violation that does not meet the requirements of subparagraph (B) or (C), a civil penalty of up to five hundred dollars ($500).

(B) For a violation that occurred within one year of a previous violation, a civil penalty of up to seven hundred fifty dollars ($750).

(C) For a violation that occurred within one year of a second or subsequent violation, a civil penalty of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000).

(2) Each fur product that constitutes a violation of subdivision (b) shall be treated as a separate violation in a civil action brought pursuant to this section.

(f)

(1) In lieu of seeking prosecution of a violation of subdivision (b) as a misdemeanor, the department, the Attorney General, or the city attorney of the city or the district attorney or county counsel of the county in which a violation of subdivision (b) occurs, may bring a civil action to recover the civil penalty in subdivision (e). The civil action shall be brought in the county in which the violation occurs and any penalty imposed shall be transferred to the Controller for deposit in the Fish and Game Preservation Fund in accordance with Section 13001 and used exclusively for the purposes described in Section 1771 and for the enforcement of this section.

(2) In an action brought under this section, in addition to the penalty specified in subdivision (e), the reasonable costs of investigation, reasonable attorney’s fees, and reasonable expert witness’ fees may also be recovered and those amounts shall be credited to the same operating funds as those from which the expenditures for those purposes were derived.

(g) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2023.

(h) The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.

fur sales ban fur product prohibition animal skins fashion accessories taxidermy exemption used fur exemption tribal rights civil penalties wildlife fund religious exemption fur manufacturing sale records native american tribes California fur law wildlife conservation funding

(Added by Stats. 2019, Ch. 764, Sec. 1. (AB 44) Effective January 1, 2020. Operative January 1, 2023, by its own provisions.)

Section § 2024

This law addresses the illegal poaching and sale of dudleya plants, which are native to California and referred to as "live-forevers." Poaching threatens biodiversity and ecosystem functions, and dudleya have become especially valued in Asian black markets. The law makes it illegal to remove, sell, or trade dudleya without proper permission, and sets penalties for violations. First offenses can lead to fines up to $50,000 and jail time, while repeat offenses can result in fines up to $500,000. Legal exceptions exist for those with specific licenses or permits. Additionally, the law requires replanting costs and mandates forfeiture of seized plants upon conviction.

(a) The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:

(1) Illegal poaching of the state’s native plants is a threat to the state’s biodiversity, can put certain species at risk for extinction, and can negatively impact entire ecosystem functions.

(2) The illicit trade of live plants and animals is a multibillion dollar market responsible for the unwanted transmission of pests and diseases from one country to another.

(3) Dudleya poaching, specifically, has increased dramatically because they have become popular in many Southeast Asian countries, where a single plant can be sold for up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) on the black market. As a result, some poaching operations have been found to be in possession of thousands of dudleya taken from the state’s forests, mountains, and coastal bluffs.

(4) Some species of dudleya, which already face conservation challenges, such as habitat loss from development or altered wildfire regimes, are endemic to the state and their worldwide distribution is limited to a single county, island, or mountain range.

(5) Protecting dudleya populations from poaching activity is necessary to prevent the loss of species and to promote the conservation of the state’s biodiversity.

(b) For purposes of this section, “dudleya” means a succulent plant that belongs to the genus Dudleya and referred to commonly as “live-forevers” or “dudleya” that is native to California and grows in natural habitats.

(c) Except as provided in subdivision (e), it is unlawful to uproot, remove, harvest, or cut dudleya from land owned by the state or a local government or from property not their own without written permission from the landowner in their immediate possession.

(d) It is unlawful to sell, offer for sale, possess with intent to sell, transport for sale, export for sale, or purchase dudleya uprooted, removed, harvested, or cut in violation of subdivision (c).

(e) A person who holds a license or permit pursuant to Section 1002 may take dudleya consistent with that license or permit.

(f) Notwithstanding Section 12000, for a violation of this section, or any rule, regulation, or order adopted pursuant to this section, the following criminal penalties shall be imposed:

(1) For a first conviction, where the total value is two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more, the offense shall be a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not less than five thousand dollars ($5,000) and not more than fifty thousand dollars ($50,000), imprisonment in the county jail for not more than six months, or by both the fine and imprisonment.

(2) For a second or subsequent conviction, the offense shall be a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) and not more than five hundred thousand dollars, ($500,000), imprisonment in the county jail for not more than six months, or by both the fine and imprisonment.

(g) In addition to, and separate from, any criminal penalty provided for under subdivision (f), where applicable, the cost of replanting any dudleya forfeited pursuant to subdivision (h), may be imposed by the court.

(h) Upon conviction or other entry of judgment for a violation of this section, any seized dudleya shall be forfeited to the department.

(i) Notwithstanding Section 802 of the Penal Code, prosecution of an offense punishable under this section shall be commenced within three years after commission of the offense.

dudleya poaching live-forevers biodiversity threat black market plant trade illegal plant removal plant sale penalties endemic species protection biodiversity conservation illegal uprooting dudleya conservation criminal penalties export prohibition permits and licenses native plant protection ecosystem impact

(Added by Stats. 2021, Ch. 370, Sec. 1. (AB 223) Effective January 1, 2022.)

Fish And Game Generally

Chapter 1Taking and Possessing in General