Section § 3010

Explanation

This law states that both the mother and father of a minor child generally have equal rights to the child's custody if the father meets certain legal criteria. If one parent is unable to care for the child, has passed away, refuses, or has left the child, the other parent gets custody.

(a)CA Family Law Code § 3010(a) The mother of an unemancipated minor child and the father, if presumed to be the father under Section 7611, are equally entitled to the custody of the child.
(b)CA Family Law Code § 3010(b) If one parent is dead, is unable or refuses to take custody, or has abandoned the child, the other parent is entitled to custody of the child.

Section § 3011

Explanation

This law outlines how courts decide what's best for a child in custody cases. Key factors include the child's health and safety, any history of abuse by a parent, how much time the child spends with each parent, and if either parent misuses drugs or alcohol. The court might need independent proof for abuse or substance allegations, like reports from police or social services. When a parent with these allegations gets custody or unsupervised visits, the court must explain why this is safe for the child. Also, decisions should avoid bias related to sex, gender identity, or sexual orientation.

(a)CA Family Law Code § 3011(a) In making a determination of the best interests of the child in a proceeding described in Section 3021, the court shall, among any other factors it finds relevant and consistent with Section 3020, consider all of the following:
(1)CA Family Law Code § 3011(a)(1) The health, safety, and welfare of the child.
(2)Copy CA Family Law Code § 3011(a)(2)
(A)Copy CA Family Law Code § 3011(a)(2)(A) A history of abuse by one parent or any other person seeking custody against any of the following:
(i)CA Family Law Code § 3011(a)(2)(A)(i) A child to whom the parent or person seeking custody is related by blood or affinity or with whom the parent or person seeking custody has had a caretaking relationship, no matter how temporary.
(ii)CA Family Law Code § 3011(a)(2)(A)(ii) The other parent.
(iii)CA Family Law Code § 3011(a)(2)(A)(iii) A parent, current spouse, or cohabitant, of the parent or person seeking custody, or a person with whom the parent or person seeking custody has a dating or engagement relationship.
(B)CA Family Law Code § 3011(a)(2)(A)(B) As a prerequisite to considering allegations of abuse, the court may require independent corroboration, including, but not limited to, written reports by law enforcement agencies, child protective services or other social welfare agencies, courts, medical facilities, or other public agencies or private nonprofit organizations providing services to victims of sexual assault or domestic violence. As used in this paragraph, “abuse against a child” means “child abuse and neglect” as defined in Section 11165.6 of the Penal Code and abuse against any other person described in clause (ii) or (iii) of subparagraph (A) means “abuse” as defined in Section 6203.
(3)CA Family Law Code § 3011(a)(3) The nature and amount of contact with both parents, including as provided in Sections 3046 and 3100.
(4)CA Family Law Code § 3011(a)(4) The habitual or continual illegal use of controlled substances, the habitual or continual abuse of alcohol, or the habitual or continual abuse of prescribed controlled substances by either parent. Before considering these allegations, the court may first require independent corroboration, including, but not limited to, written reports from law enforcement agencies, courts, probation departments, social welfare agencies, medical facilities, rehabilitation facilities, or other public agencies or nonprofit organizations providing drug and alcohol abuse services. As used in this paragraph, “controlled substances” has the same meaning as defined in the California Uniform Controlled Substances Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code).
(5)Copy CA Family Law Code § 3011(a)(5)
(A)Copy CA Family Law Code § 3011(a)(5)(A) When allegations about a parent pursuant to paragraph (2) or (4) have been brought to the attention of the court in the current proceeding, and the court makes an order for sole or joint custody or unsupervised visitation to that parent, the court shall state its reasons in writing or on the record that the order is in the best interest of the child and protects the safety of the parties and the child. In these circumstances, the court shall ensure that any order regarding custody or visitation is specific as to time, day, place, and manner of transfer of the child as set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 6323.
(B)CA Family Law Code § 3011(a)(5)(A)(B) Nothing in this paragraph eliminates the requirement that the contents of the stipulation be in the best interest of the child and be specific as to time, day, place, and manner of transfer of the child if the parties do stipulate in writing or on the record regarding custody or visitation.
(b)CA Family Law Code § 3011(b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the court shall not consider the sex, gender identity, gender expression, or sexual orientation of a parent, legal guardian, or relative in determining the best interests of the child.

Section § 3012

Explanation

This law says that if someone involved in a child custody case is deported or detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and this keeps them from attending the court in person, the court should allow them to take part in the case from a distance, like through phone or video calls, as long as the court can do so. Also, these remote methods can't be used to make the official record of the proceedings.

(a)CA Family Law Code § 3012(a) If a party’s deportation or detention by the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement of the Department of Homeland Security will have a material effect on the person’s ability, or anticipated ability, to appear in person at a child custody proceeding, the court shall, upon motion of the party, allow the party to present testimony and evidence and participate in mandatory child custody mediation by electronic means, including, but not limited to, telephone, video teleconferencing, or other electronic means that provide remote access to the hearing, to the extent that this technology is reasonably available to the court and protects the due process rights of all parties.
(b)CA Family Law Code § 3012(b) This section does not authorize the use of electronic recording for the purpose of taking the official record of these proceedings.