As used in this chapter, “direct evidence” means evidence that directly proves a fact, without an inference or presumption, and which in itself, if true, conclusively establishes that fact.
Chapter 5Weight of Evidence Generally
Section § 410
Direct evidence is any proof that clearly shows a fact is true without needing additional assumptions or guesses. If believed, this type of evidence alone can definitively confirm that fact.
direct evidence proof fact inference presumption conclusive legal evidence truth establishes fact California evidence rules legal proof witness testimony video evidence eyewitness physical evidence
Section § 411
This law states that if a witness is credible, their direct testimony alone can be enough to prove a fact unless another law specifically requires more evidence.
Except where additional evidence is required by statute, the direct evidence of one witness who is entitled to full credit is sufficient for proof of any fact.
credible witness testimony proof of fact direct evidence sufficient evidence witness credibility testimony requirements fact proof single witness rule evidence sufficiency witness testimony statutory evidence requirements legal proof standards
Section § 412
If someone presents weak evidence in a situation where they could have provided stronger evidence, that weak evidence should be treated with suspicion.
If weaker and less satisfactory evidence is offered when it was within the power of the party to produce stronger and more satisfactory evidence, the evidence offered should be viewed with distrust.
weak evidence stronger evidence evidence quality satisfactory evidence distrust evidence power to produce evidence evidence strength evaluation of evidence evidence reliability burden of proof evidence assessment legal suspicion of evidence
Section § 413
This law says that in a court case, if someone doesn't explain or deny evidence or facts presented against them, or if they intentionally hide evidence, it can be used against them when deciding what conclusions to draw. This means a judge or jury can consider these actions (or lack of action) when determining a party's responsibility in a case.
In determining what inferences to draw from the evidence or facts in the case against a party, the trier of fact may consider, among other things, the party’s failure to explain or to deny by his testimony such evidence or facts in the case against him, or his willful suppression of evidence relating thereto, if such be the case.
inferences from evidence failure to testify willful suppression of evidence trier of fact considerations evidence interpretation party's failure to explain denial of testimony concealment of evidence legal consequences of non-disclosure impact of silence evidence concealment evidence and inference court case evidence implications non-disclosure impact responsibility determination
