Section § 56.35

Explanation

If a patient's medical information is wrongly shared or used, they can seek financial compensation. They might get reimbursed for any actual financial losses or personal harm caused by this, and can also claim up to $3,000 in additional damages as a punishment to the violator. Furthermore, they can be awarded up to $1,000 for their attorney fees and any related court costs.

In addition to any other remedies available at law, a patient whose medical information has been used or disclosed in violation of Section 56.10, 56.104, 56.107, or 56.20 or subdivision (a) of Section 56.26 and who has sustained economic loss or personal injury therefrom may recover compensatory damages, punitive damages not to exceed three thousand dollars ($3,000), attorney’s fees not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000), and the costs of litigation.

Section § 56.36

Explanation

This law section addresses the mishandling of patients' confidential medical information and the consequences for those violations. If someone leaks this private data resulting in economic loss or personal injury, it's a misdemeanor. Affected individuals can sue those responsible for damages, including a set amount of nominal damages or actual damages suffered. There are penalties for people or entities that fail to protect medical data, with fines differing based on whether the act was done negligently, knowingly, willfully, or for financial gain. The law also outlines various defenses for those accused and specifies factors to consider when determining penalties. Enforcement can come from several public officials, and penalties or fines collected are distributed between various government funds. Finally, those who disclose data appropriately per the law aren't penalized.

(a)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(a) A violation of the provisions of this part that results in economic loss or personal injury to a patient is punishable as a misdemeanor.
(b)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(b) In addition to any other remedies available at law, an individual may bring an action against a person or entity who has negligently released confidential information or records concerning him or her in violation of this part, for either or both of the following:
(1)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(b)(1) Except as provided in subdivision (e), nominal damages of one thousand dollars ($1,000). In order to recover under this paragraph, it is not necessary that the plaintiff suffered or was threatened with actual damages.
(2)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(b)(2) The amount of actual damages, if any, sustained by the patient.
(c)Copy CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(c)
(1)Copy CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(c)(1) In addition, a person or entity that negligently discloses medical information in violation of the provisions of this part shall also be liable, irrespective of the amount of damages suffered by the patient as a result of that violation, for an administrative fine or civil penalty not to exceed two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) per violation.
(2)Copy CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(c)(2)
(A)Copy CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(c)(2)(A) A person or entity, other than a licensed health care professional, who knowingly and willfully obtains, discloses, or uses medical information in violation of this part shall be liable for an administrative fine or civil penalty not to exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) per violation.
(B)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(c)(2)(A)(B) A licensed health care professional who knowingly and willfully obtains, discloses, or uses medical information in violation of this part shall be liable on a first violation for an administrative fine or civil penalty not to exceed two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) per violation, on a second violation for an administrative fine or civil penalty not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per violation, or on a third and subsequent violation for an administrative fine or civil penalty not to exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) per violation. This subdivision shall not be construed to limit the liability of a health care service plan, a contractor, or a provider of health care that is not a licensed health care professional for a violation of this part.
(3)Copy CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(c)(3)
(A)Copy CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(c)(3)(A) A person or entity, other than a licensed health care professional, who knowingly or willfully obtains or uses medical information in violation of this part for the purpose of financial gain shall be liable for an administrative fine or civil penalty not to exceed two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) per violation and shall also be subject to disgorgement of any proceeds or other consideration obtained as a result of the violation.
(B)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(c)(3)(A)(B) A licensed health care professional who knowingly and willfully obtains, discloses, or uses medical information in violation of this part for financial gain shall be liable on a first violation for an administrative fine or civil penalty not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000) per violation, on a second violation for an administrative fine or civil penalty not to exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) per violation, or on a third and subsequent violation for an administrative fine or civil penalty not to exceed two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) per violation and shall also be subject to disgorgement of any proceeds or other consideration obtained as a result of the violation. This subdivision shall not be construed to limit the liability of a health care service plan, a contractor, or a provider of health care that is not a licensed health care professional for any violation of this part.
(4)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(c)(4) This subdivision shall not be construed as authorizing an administrative fine or civil penalty under both paragraphs (2) and (3) for the same violation.
(5)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(c)(5) A person or entity who is not permitted to receive medical information pursuant to this part and who knowingly and willfully obtains, discloses, or uses medical information without written authorization from the patient shall be liable for a civil penalty not to exceed two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) per violation.
(d)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(d) In assessing the amount of an administrative fine or civil penalty pursuant to subdivision (c), the State Department of Public Health, licensing agency, or certifying board or court shall consider any of the relevant circumstances presented by any of the parties to the case including, but not limited to, the following:
(1)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(d)(1) Whether the defendant has made a reasonable, good faith attempt to comply with this part.
(2)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(d)(2) The nature and seriousness of the misconduct.
(3)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(d)(3) The harm to the patient, enrollee, or subscriber.
(4)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(d)(4) The number of violations.
(5)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(d)(5) The persistence of the misconduct.
(6)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(d)(6) The length of time over which the misconduct occurred.
(7)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(d)(7) The willfulness of the defendant’s misconduct.
(8)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(d)(8) The defendant’s assets, liabilities, and net worth.
(e)Copy CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(e)
(1)Copy CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(e)(1) In an action brought by an individual pursuant to subdivision (b) on or after January 1, 2013, in which the defendant establishes the affirmative defense in paragraph (2), the court shall award any actual damages and reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, but shall not award nominal damages for a violation of this part.
(2)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(e)(2) The defendant is entitled to an affirmative defense if all of the following are established, subject to the equitable considerations in paragraph (3):
(A)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(e)(2)(A) The defendant is a covered entity or business associate, as defined in Section 160.103 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations, in effect as of January 1, 2012.
(B)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(e)(2)(B) The defendant has complied with any obligations to notify all persons entitled to receive notice regarding the release of the information or records.
(C)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(e)(2)(C) The release of confidential information or records was solely to another covered entity or business associate.
(D)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(e)(2)(D) The release of confidential information or records was not an incident of medical identity theft. For purposes of this subparagraph, “medical identity theft” means the use of an individual’s personal information, as defined in Section 1798.80, without the individual’s knowledge or consent, to obtain medical goods or services, or to submit false claims for medical services.
(E)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(e)(2)(E) The defendant took appropriate preventive actions to protect the confidential information or records against release consistent with the defendant’s obligations under this part or other applicable state law and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-191) (HIPAA) and all HIPAA Administrative Simplification Regulations in effect on January 1, 2012, contained in Parts 160, 162, and 164 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and Part 2 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, including, but not limited to, all of the following:
(i)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(e)(2)(E)(i) Developing and implementing security policies and procedures.
(ii)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(e)(2)(E)(ii) Designating a security official who is responsible for developing and implementing its security policies and procedures, including educating and training the workforce.
(iii)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(e)(2)(E)(iii) Encrypting the information or records, and protecting against the release or use of the encryption key and passwords, or transmitting the information or records in a manner designed to provide equal or greater protections against improper disclosures.
(F)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(e)(2)(F) The defendant took reasonable and appropriate corrective action after the release of the confidential information or records, and the covered entity or business associate that received the confidential information or records destroyed or returned the confidential information or records in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay, consistent with any measures necessary to determine the scope of the breach and restore the reasonable integrity of the data system. A court may consider this subparagraph to be established if the defendant shows in detail that the covered entity or business associate could not destroy or return the confidential information or records because of the technology utilized.
(G)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(e)(2)(G) The covered entity or business associate that received the confidential information or records, or any of its agents, independent contractors, or employees, regardless of the scope of the employee’s employment, did not retain, use, or release the information or records.
(H)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(e)(2)(H) After the release of the confidential information or records, the defendant took reasonable and appropriate action to prevent a future similar release of confidential information or records.
(I)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(e)(2)(I) The defendant has not previously established an affirmative defense pursuant to this subdivision, or the court determines, in its discretion, that application of the affirmative defense is compelling and consistent with the purposes of this section to promote reasonable conduct in light of all the facts.
(3)Copy CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(e)(3)
(A)Copy CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(e)(3)(A) In determining whether the affirmative defense may be established pursuant to paragraph (2), the court shall consider the equity of the situation, including, but not limited to, (i) whether the defendant has previously violated this part, regardless of whether an action has previously been brought, and (ii) the nature of the prior violation.
(B)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(e)(3)(A)(B) To the extent the court allows discovery to determine whether there has been any other violation of this part that the court will consider in balancing the equities, the defendant shall not provide any medical information, as defined in Section 56.05. The court, in its discretion, may enter a protective order prohibiting the further use of any personal information, as defined in Section 1798.80, about the individual whose medical information may have been disclosed in a prior violation.
(4)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(e)(4) In an action under this subdivision in which the defendant establishes the affirmative defense pursuant to paragraph (2), a plaintiff shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney’s fees and costs without regard to an award of actual or nominal damages or the imposition of administrative fines or civil penalties.
(5)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(e)(5) In an action brought by an individual pursuant to subdivision (b) on or after January 1, 2013, in which the defendant establishes the affirmative defense pursuant to paragraph (2), a defendant shall not be liable for more than one judgment on the merits under this subdivision for releases of confidential information or records arising out of the same event, transaction, or occurrence.
(f)Copy CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(f)
(1)Copy CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(f)(1) The civil penalty pursuant to subdivision (c) shall be assessed and recovered in a civil action brought in the name of the people of the State of California in any court of competent jurisdiction by any of the following:
(A)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(f)(1)(A) The Attorney General.
(B)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(f)(1)(B) A district attorney.
(C)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(f)(1)(C) A county counsel authorized by agreement with the district attorney in actions involving violation of a county ordinance.
(D)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(f)(1)(D) A city attorney of a city.
(E)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(f)(1)(E) A city attorney of a city and county having a population in excess of 750,000, with the consent of the district attorney.
(F)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(f)(1)(F) A city prosecutor in a city having a full-time city prosecutor or, with the consent of the district attorney, by a city attorney in a city and county.
(G)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(f)(1)(G) The State Public Health Officer, or his or her designee, may recommend that a person described in subparagraphs (A) to (F), inclusive, bring a civil action under this section.
(2)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(f)(2) If the action is brought by the Attorney General, one-half of the penalty collected shall be paid to the treasurer of the county in which the judgment was entered, and one-half to the General Fund. If the action is brought by a district attorney or county counsel, the penalty collected shall be paid to the treasurer of the county in which the judgment was entered. Except as provided in paragraph (3), if the action is brought by a city attorney or city prosecutor, one-half of the penalty collected shall be paid to the treasurer of the city in which the judgment was entered and one-half to the treasurer of the county in which the judgment was entered.
(3)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(f)(3) If the action is brought by a city attorney of a city and county, the entire amount of the penalty collected shall be paid to the treasurer of the city and county in which the judgment was entered.
(4)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(f)(4) This section shall not be construed as authorizing both an administrative fine and civil penalty for the same violation.
(5)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(f)(5) Imposition of a fine or penalty provided for in this section shall not preclude imposition of other sanctions or remedies authorized by law.
(6)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(f)(6) Administrative fines or penalties issued pursuant to Section 1280.15 of the Health and Safety Code shall offset any other administrative fine or civil penalty imposed under this section for the same violation.
(g)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(g) For purposes of this section, “knowing” and “willful” shall have the same meanings as in Section 7 of the Penal Code.
(h)CA Civil Law Code § 56.36(h) A person who discloses protected medical information in accordance with the provisions of this part is not subject to the penalty provisions of this part.

Section § 56.37

Explanation

This section of the law makes it clear that health care providers and insurance companies can't force patients to sign anything that allows disclosure of their medical information, unless it's necessary for the insurance underwriting process and certain rules are followed. It also states that any agreement by a patient to waive their privacy rights, except in a few specific situations, is considered invalid.

(a)CA Civil Law Code § 56.37(a) No provider of health care, health care service plan, or contractor may require a patient, as a condition of receiving health care services, to sign an authorization, release, consent, or waiver that would permit the disclosure of medical information that otherwise may not be disclosed under Section 56.10 or any other provision of law. However, a health care service plan or disability insurer may require relevant enrollee or subscriber medical information as a condition of the medical underwriting process, provided that Sections 1374.7 and 1389.1 of the Health and Safety Code are strictly observed.
(b)CA Civil Law Code § 56.37(b) Any waiver by a patient of the provisions of this part, except as authorized by Section 56.11 or 56.21 or subdivision (b) of Section 56.26, shall be deemed contrary to public policy and shall be unenforceable.