Sino mang tao na apektado ng isang pinal na utos ng lupon, kabilang ang departamento, ay maaaring, sa loob ng takdang panahon na tinukoy sa seksyong ito, mag-aplay sa Korte Suprema o sa korte ng apela para sa distrito ng apela kung saan nagmula ang paglilitis, para sa isang writ of review ng naturang pinal na utos. Ang aplikasyon para sa writ of review ay dapat gawin sa loob ng 30 araw pagkatapos ng paghahain ng pinal na utos ng lupon.
AdministrasyonPagsusuring Panghukuman
Section § 23090
Kung ang isang tao ay apektado ng pinal na desisyon ng isang lupon, indibidwal man ito o ang mismong departamento, maaari silang humiling sa Korte Suprema o sa korte ng apela na suriin ang desisyong iyon. Kailangan nilang gawin ito sa loob ng 30 araw pagkatapos maihain ang pinal na desisyon ng lupon.
writ of review pinal na utos apektadong tao
Section § 23090.1
Si un tribunal desea revisar un caso manejado por la junta, ordenará a la junta que envíe todos los registros del caso al tribunal. El tribunal no aceptará ninguna prueba nueva y tomará su decisión basándose en los registros existentes.
auto de revisión orden judicial certificación de registros de la junta
Section § 23090.2
[TL: This section says that when a court reviews a decision made by a department, the court is only looking at certain things. The court checks if the department acted within its legal limits and followed proper procedures. It also examines whether the department's decision is backed by their findings and if those findings are backed by strong evidence from the entire record. Lastly, the court considers whether any important evidence was excluded or couldn't have been presented during the department's hearing. However, the court is not allowed to conduct a new trial or reassess the evidence themselves.]
[TL: The review by the court shall not extend further than to determine, based on the whole record of the department as certified by the board, whether:]
(a)CA Negosyo At Propesyon Code § 23090.2(a) [TL: The department has proceeded without or in excess of its jurisdiction.]
(b)CA Negosyo At Propesyon Code § 23090.2(b) [TL: The department has proceeded in the manner required by law.]
(c)CA Negosyo At Propesyon Code § 23090.2(c) [TL: The decision of the department is supported by the findings.]
(d)CA Negosyo At Propesyon Code § 23090.2(d) [TL: The findings in the department’s decision are supported by substantial evidence in the light of the whole record.]
(e)CA Negosyo At Propesyon Code § 23090.2(e) [TL: There is relevant evidence which, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, could not have been produced or which was improperly excluded at the hearing before the department.]
[TL: Nothing in this article shall permit the court to hold a trial de novo, to take evidence, or to exercise its independent judgment on the evidence.]
[TL: court review] [TL: department jurisdiction] [TL: legal procedures]
Section § 23090.3
Undang-undang ini menyatakan bahwa jika departemen membuat keputusan berdasarkan temuan faktual, temuan tersebut bersifat final dan tidak dapat ditinjau lagi. Namun, siapa pun yang terlibat dalam kasus tersebut, termasuk dewan dan departemen itu sendiri, dapat mengambil bagian dalam proses peninjauan. Setelah meninjau kasus tersebut, pengadilan dapat menyetujui keputusan departemen, tidak menyetujuinya, atau mengirim kembali kasus tersebut ke departemen untuk peninjauan lebih lanjut atau pertimbangan ulang.
Temuan dan kesimpulan departemen mengenai pertanyaan fakta bersifat konklusif dan final serta tidak dapat ditinjau. Pertanyaan fakta tersebut harus mencakup fakta-fakta pokok dan temuan serta kesimpulan departemen. Dewan, departemen, dan setiap pihak dalam tindakan atau proses di hadapan dewan berhak untuk hadir dalam proses peninjauan. Setelah persidangan, pengadilan akan mengeluarkan putusan yang menguatkan atau membatalkan keputusan departemen, atau pengadilan dapat mengembalikan kasus tersebut untuk proses lebih lanjut atau pertimbangan ulang oleh departemen.
temuan faktual keputusan final proses peninjauan
Section § 23090.4
This law says that when you're involved in legal review cases related to this article, the rules from the Code of Civil Procedure about review writs apply. Plus, you must give a copy of any legal documents you file to the board, the department, and anyone else who was part of the previous hearing with the board.
writs of review Code of Civil Procedure pleadings
Section § 23090.5
Undang-undang ini menjelaskan bahwa, secara umum, hanya Mahkamah Agung California dan pengadilan banding tertentu yang dapat meninjau atau mengubah keputusan yang dibuat oleh departemen negara bagian tertentu. Namun, jika ada keputusan darurat yang dibuat oleh departemen ini, pengadilan tinggi dapat turun tangan untuk meninjaunya. Peninjauan khusus oleh pengadilan tinggi ini terbatas pada keadaan darurat dan tidak meluas ke bagian lain dari kasus tersebut atau memengaruhi proses hukum lainnya.
yurisdiksi keputusan darurat peninjauan pengadilan tinggi
Section § 23090.6
Kung mayroong kumukuwestiyon sa desisyon ng isang departamento sa pamamagitan ng paghahain ng isang espesyal na legal na kahilingan na tinatawag na 'writ of review', hindi awtomatikong mapipigilan ang desisyon. Gayunpaman, ang korte na humahawak sa kaso ay maaaring magpasya na ipatigil ang desisyon kung sa tingin nila ay kinakailangan, sa ilalim ng ilang kundisyon.
writ of review pagpapatigil ng operasyon pagsuspinde ng desisyon
Section § 23090.7
Sinasabi ng seksyon ng batas na ito na kung may umapela sa desisyon ng departamento sa lupon, ang desisyong iyon, at anumang pinal na utos mula sa lupon, ay hindi magkakabisa habang mayroon pang oras para humingi ng judicial review ng kaso.
desisyong inapela pinal na utos ng lupon panahon ng pagiging epektibo
