Article 1General Provisions
Section § 17210
This section defines various terms related to environmental safety for school sites. It clarifies what "administering agency" and "environmental assessor" mean and explains how terms like "handle," "hazardous air emissions," "hazardous material," and "regulated substance" are understood according to specific sections of the Health and Safety Code. It also describes processes like "Phase I environmental assessment" and "preliminary endangerment assessment," which are necessary to identify potential hazards at proposed school sites. Additionally, the section defines a "proposed schoolsite," "release," "remedial action plan," and the "State act," which refers to a specific act dealing with hazardous substances.
Section § 17210.1
This law deals with school sites in California that want to use state funds and may have naturally occurring hazardous materials. It says that when schools apply for these funds, the handling of hazardous materials and children’s health must be considered. Any risk assessments must specifically focus on risks to children's health. Safety measures must be put in place with children's health as a priority. Also, before starting certain safety checks, schools must notify nearby residents. The law also ensures agencies like the Department of Toxic Substances Control can still act under other legal powers. Lastly, if the Legislature doesn’t fund this oversight, the department can recover its costs based on other legal rules.
Section § 17211
Before a school district buys land for a new school or expands an existing school, the school board must evaluate the property at a public meeting using specific standards set by the State Department of Education. They can also have an advisory committee assess the property and share their findings at this meeting.
Section § 17212
When a school district plans to buy land for a new school building, it must first have the site thoroughly checked out by experts. This is to make sure the choice isn’t based only on the cost of the land but considers everything that affects the public’s interest. If the area is known for geological hazards like earthquakes, more studies must be done by qualified professionals to see if it’s safe. If making the school safe is too expensive due to these conditions, the site shouldn't be chosen. The evaluation should also consider things like how close the site is to people, transportation, and utilities, as well as potential hazards and costs related to the project’s operation and construction.
Section § 17212.1
The law encourages different organizations, like companies, public utilities, government bodies, and school districts, to work together to evaluate the safety of a new or expanded school location.
Section § 17212.2
This law allows a school district board to ask for information from various entities about potential safety risks at a proposed school site or an addition to an existing site. The board can request data on railroads, pipelines, electrical lines, and storage tanks. These entities must respond within 30 days and can refuse if the information is confidential. If they don't comply, the school district can file a complaint with regulatory bodies to help sort out the issue.
Section § 17212.5
If a new school building is going to be built in certain risky areas, like those prone to earthquakes, or if expensive structural changes are made to an existing one, proper geological and soil checks must be done to ensure safety. These rules apply mainly to areas with known geological hazards, but the authorities might request them anywhere. Schools can't be built on known earthquake fault lines where ground movement is expected. Any reports from these studies have to be shared with the state's General Services and Education Departments, and the expenses for these checks can count as a significant investment. The cost limit mentioned will go up every year based on construction cost changes.
Section § 17213
Before a school district can approve a new school location, they must ensure the site is safe and free from hazardous conditions. They need to check for toxic waste, pollution, and any dangerous surroundings like pipelines or heavy traffic areas. The district must work with local environmental agencies to identify and assess any potential pollution sources or risks. If pollution is found near the site, the district must conclude that it won’t harm students or staff. If no other suitable sites are available, the district must formally state why they are choosing the location despite the risks and ensure they have plans to minimize those risks.
Section § 17213.1
This law outlines what a school district in California must do to get state funding when acquiring or building on a school site. Before buying land, the district must hire an environmental expert to do a Phase I assessment to check for hazardous materials. If more investigation is needed, a preliminary endangerment assessment is required. The findings must be submitted to the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) for approval. The district must also inform the public and allow comments on the assessment. If hazardous materials are found, the district must evaluate costs and benefits before proceeding. The law also protects districts from liability when sharing assessment information and outlines when these rules apply based on past amendments.
Section § 17213.2
If a school district plans to use state funds for a new school site, they must check for hazardous materials on the property. If dangers are found, they need to work with the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) to clean things up before building. However, if the hazard is only in underwater areas they didn't affect, and they allow DTSC access, they might not have to take action. Construction can only begin if DTSC says it's safe and doesn't interfere with clean-ups. If new hazards are discovered during construction, work must halt until cleared by DTSC. The district also needs to cover all costs related to these inspections and clean-ups, but they might get reimbursed later.
Section § 17215
This law requires that before a school district or charter school can buy or lease property for a new school site within two miles of an airport or potential runway, it must first notify the State Department of Education and comply with specific procedures. The State Department of Education then informs the Department of Transportation to assess the site. Within 30 days, the Department of Transportation evaluates the site and sends a report to the State Department of Education. The school cannot proceed with acquiring the site without this report. If the report advises against the location, school funds cannot be used for the site. If it is favorable, the school must hold a public hearing before proceeding. This law does not apply to sites acquired before 1966.
Section § 17215.5
Before buying land for a new school in areas marked for agriculture, a school district must do a few things: talk to local authorities about the location, consider all factors beyond just land cost, and try to lower any health or safety risks from nearby farming activities. These rules don't apply to sites approved before January 1, 1997.
Section § 17216
This law states that any actions taken by the State Department of Education, other state agencies, or political subdivisions, in relation to this chapter, will not impact any rights established under Section 19 of Article 1 of the California Constitution.
Section § 17217
This law allows a school district to acquire land for a new school building that is next to its boundaries. To do this, the school board must approve the plan, then file a petition with the local county superintendent, and get approval from relevant county school committees. If those committees don't approve, the proposal can be sent to the Superintendent of Public Instruction. The decision-makers must ensure the move won't cause discrimination, increase costs, disrupt education, spike housing costs, or unfairly increase property values. The law also permits the use of eminent domain, meaning the government can take private land for public use if needed. Lastly, land is considered next to the district even if a road or barrier separates them.
Section § 17218
This law says that if a school district is set to merge with others to form a new unified school district, the current school district's board can buy land for a new school building within the future unified district area before the merger is fully in effect. However, they need to get feedback from a county committee on their plans within 60 days before proceeding with the purchase.
Section § 17219
This law outlines what happens when a school district in California buys a site for school purposes but doesn’t use it within certain timeframes—either five or seven years, depending on the grade levels. If a site remains unused, the district must make nonuse payments unless the State Allocation Board believes the site will soon be used as intended. However, no payments are required for sites valued at $20,000 or less, with this threshold adjusted for inflation annually. The payment amounts are calculated based on the original purchase price modified by changes in the land’s value. If a district tries to sell the site but gets no fair offers, they can avoid payments for a year. Payments are also avoided if the site is used for civic purposes, recreational activities, emergency classroom storage, child care, or if it’s leased in a way subjecting it to similar taxes as if sold.
Section § 17220
This law says that once a school district is exempt from making payments for not using a school site, based on specific rules, that exemption will keep going as long as the district confirms the reasons for the exemption are still there.
Section § 17221
If a school district leases its property, and the money from that lease is used to pay off bond debts tied to building school facilities, the district can reduce what it owes in nonuse payments under another law, regardless of the fiscal year.
Section § 17222
This law section explains that the Controller is responsible for deducting payment amounts from school districts over four months if the Executive Officer of the State Allocation Board certifies the payment amount. The deductions occur in February, March, April, and May, and come from funds the district receives from the State School Fund. However, deductions cannot leave a district with less than $120 per student based on the previous year’s average daily attendance. The deducted funds are transferred to a new fund called the State School Site Utilization Fund.
Section § 17223
This law talks about school districts dealing with unused sites. If a district starts using or sells an unused school site within two years after the state deducted a nonuse payment, they will get back the payments from the state that were withheld. No interest will be paid, though. If the district starts using or sells the site after more than two years, they will stop losing more payments going forward, but won't get back what's already been deducted.
Section § 17224
This section explains how leftover funds in certain school-related funds should be handled. If there are funds in the State School Site Utilization Fund that do not need to be given back to a school district, those funds can be used to support the administration of a specific school facilities act once the Legislature has approved it. Additionally, any leftover money in the State School Deferred Maintenance Fund as of July 1, 2014, should be moved to the State School Site Utilization Fund.