Section § 664

Explanation

This law says that after a jury trial, the court clerk must officially record the judgment based on the jury's decision within 24 hours, even if there's a request to change the verdict, unless the court decides to delay for further discussion or pauses the case. If the trial was conducted by a judge, the judgment should be entered right after the judge's decision is filed. A judgment isn't valid until it's officially entered.

When trial by jury has been had, judgment must be entered by the clerk, in conformity to the verdict within 24 hours after the rendition of the verdict, whether or not a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict be pending, unless the court order the case to be reserved for argument or further consideration, or grant a stay of proceedings. If the trial has been had by the court, judgment must be entered by the clerk, in conformity to the decision of the court, immediately upon the filing of such decision. In no case is a judgment effectual for any purpose until entered.

Section § 664.5

Explanation

This law outlines who is responsible for notifying parties about the entry of a judgment in various court cases. If parties are represented by a lawyer, the party filing the judgment must serve notice of entry to all involved parties and file proof with the court. The court clerk handles this duty if no lawyer represents a party. It also explains that 'judgment' refers to any ruling that can be appealed. Additionally, if a court declares a state law unconstitutional, the Attorney General must be notified promptly.

(a)CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.5(a) In any contested action or special proceeding other than a small claims action or an action or proceeding in which a prevailing party is not represented by counsel, the party submitting an order or judgment for entry shall prepare and serve, a copy of the notice of entry of judgment to all parties who have appeared in the action or proceeding and shall file with the court the original notice of entry of judgment together with the proof of service. This subdivision does not apply in a proceeding for dissolution of marriage, for nullity of marriage, or for legal separation.
(b)CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.5(b) Promptly upon entry of judgment in a contested action or special proceeding in which a prevailing party is not represented by counsel, the clerk of the court shall serve notice of entry of judgment to all parties who have appeared in the action or special proceeding and shall execute a certificate of service and place it in the court’s file in the cause.
(c)CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.5(c) For purposes of this section, “judgment” includes any judgment, decree, or signed order from which an appeal lies.
(d)CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.5(d) Upon order of the court in any action or special proceeding, the clerk shall serve notice of entry of any judgment or ruling, whether or not appealable.
(e)CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.5(e) The Judicial Council shall provide by rule of court that, upon entry of judgment in a contested action or special proceeding in which a state statute or regulation has been declared unconstitutional by the court, the Attorney General is promptly notified of the judgment and that a certificate of that service is placed in the court’s file in the cause.

Section § 664.6

Explanation

This law explains how settlements in ongoing court cases can be finalized. If the people involved agree in writing or in court to a settlement, the judge can make it official or dismiss the case, but still keep an eye on things to make sure the settlement is followed. Different people can sign on behalf of a party, like their lawyer, but the rules don’t apply to cases about family issues, harassment, or certain other legal areas. If a settlement isn't followed, the court can step in. There’s a new process for settlements that will be updated by 2025.

(a)CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.6(a) If parties to pending litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement. If the parties to the settlement agreement or their counsel stipulate in writing or orally before the court, the court may dismiss the case as to the settling parties without prejudice and retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the settlement until performance in full of the terms of the settlement.
(b)CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.6(b) For purposes of this section, a writing is signed by a party if it is signed by any of the following:
(1)CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.6(b)(1) The party.
(2)CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.6(b)(2) An attorney who represents the party.
(3)CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.6(b)(3) If an insurer is defending and indemnifying a party to the action, an agent who is authorized in writing by the insurer to sign on the party’s behalf. This paragraph does not apply if the party whom the insurer is defending would be liable under the terms of the settlement for any amount above the policy limits.
(c)CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.6(c) Paragraphs (2) and (3) of subdivision (b) do not apply in a civil harassment action, an action brought pursuant to the Family Code, an action brought pursuant to the Probate Code, or a matter that is being adjudicated in a juvenile court or a dependency court.
(d)CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.6(d) In addition to any available civil remedies, an attorney who signs a writing on behalf of a party pursuant to subdivision (b) without the party’s express authorization shall, absent good cause, be subject to professional discipline.
(e)Copy CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.6(e)
(1)Copy CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.6(e)(1) If a plaintiff, cross-complainant, or other party seeking affirmative relief has filed a notice of conditional settlement, the court may, upon its own motion, without stipulation from the parties or their counsel, set an order to show cause as to why the court should not dismiss the entire action without prejudice and retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement.
(2)CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.6(e)(2) This subdivision does not apply to actions brought pursuant to Chapter 5 of Title 3 of Part 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure (commencing with Section 378) and Part 13 of Division 2 of the Labor Code (commencing with Section 2698).
(f)CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.6(f) If the Court enters judgment or dismisses the case without prejudice pursuant to this section, the following shall apply:
(1)CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.6(f)(1) A party may file a motion or other document pertaining to the settlement, including an application for determination of good faith settlement, a motion for the reduction or determination of a lien, a petition related to the compromise of the claim of a minor or person with a disability, or, if the terms of a settlement are not performed, a motion based upon such terms. Responsive filings and related documents may also be filed.
(2)CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.6(f)(2) The court shall exercise its retained jurisdiction if a party files a notice that a written settlement agreement required of all parties was not signed by all parties.
(3)CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.6(f)(3) A party who has paid a first appearance fee shall not be assessed a first appearance fee again for filing a motion, notice or other document pertaining to the settlement after entry of judgment or dismissal without prejudice.
(4)CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.6(f)(4) The clerk of the court shall accept any motion, notice, or other document properly filed by a party after entry of judgment or dismissal without prejudice.
(g)CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.6(g) Nothing in this section shall preclude a party from filing a request for dismissal with prejudice after the court has dismissed the case without prejudice pursuant to this section.
(h)CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.6(h) On or before January 1, 2025, the Judicial Council shall update or develop new forms or Rules of Court as necessary to implement this section.
(i)CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.6(i) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2025.

Section § 664.7

Explanation

This law section is about settling lawsuits involving construction defects. If the people involved in such a lawsuit agree to settle, they can either write it down and sign it or agree in front of a judge. After that, the court can officially close the case based on those settlement terms. The court can also keep an eye on things until everything that's been promised is completed. This section updates the rules about how lawyers can help their clients settle these construction defect cases, especially when insurance is involved. It applies specifically to claims against those responsible for building or designing homes that have defects.

(a)CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.7(a) Notwithstanding Section 664.6, if parties to a pending construction defect action stipulate personally or, where a party’s contribution is paid on its behalf pursuant to a policy of insurance, the parties stipulate through their respective counsel, in a writing signed by the parties outside the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement. If requested by the parties, the court may retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the settlement until performance in full of the terms of the settlement.
(b)CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.7(b) It is the intent of the Legislature that this section modify the holding of Levy v. Superior Court (1995), 10 Cal. 4th 578, regarding the authority of counsel in a construction defect action to bind a party to a settlement.
(c)CA Civil Procedure Code § 664.7(c) For purposes of this section, “construction defect action” shall mean any civil action that seeks monetary recovery against a developer, builder, design professional, general contractor, material supplier, or subcontractor of any residential dwelling based upon a claim for alleged defects in the design or construction of the residential dwelling unit.

Section § 665

Explanation

If a case is put on hold for argument or further thought, either side can bring it back to the Court to be argued.

When the case is reserved for argument or further consideration, as mentioned in the last section, it may be brought by either party before the Court for argument.

Section § 666

Explanation
If someone wins more money than the other side in a legal counterclaim, the court should order the winning party to get that extra money. If the winning party is entitled to something else, the court should give them that too. If the awarded amount is over the court’s limit, the winning party can choose to take only what the court can grant, giving up the extra.
If a claim asserted in a cross-complaint is established at the trial and the amount so established exceeds the demand established by the party against whom the cross-complaint is asserted, judgment for the party asserting the cross-complaint must be given for the excess; or if it appears that the party asserting the cross-complaint is entitled to any other affirmative relief, judgment must be given accordingly.
When the amount found due to either party exceeds the sum for which the court is authorized to enter judgment, such party may remit the excess, and judgment may be rendered for the residue.

Section § 667

Explanation

This law deals with court cases where someone is trying to get back personal property. If the plaintiff (the person suing) wins, they can get their property back, or if that's not possible, get its value and possibly extra money for the time they were without it. If the property was already given back to the plaintiff but the defendant (the person being sued) wants it returned, the defendant can get the property back or its value if the return isn't feasible, plus potential compensation for losing it temporarily.

In an action to recover the possession of personal property, judgment for the plaintiff may be for the possession or the value thereof, in case a delivery cannot be had, and damages for the detention. If the property has been delivered to the plaintiff, and the defendant claim a return thereof judgment for the defendant may be for a return of the property or the value thereof, in case a return cannot be had, and damages for taking and withholding the same.

Section § 667.7

Explanation

If a healthcare provider is sued for injury or damages, and the future damages awarded are $250,000 or more, the court can order these to be paid in installments rather than all at once. The specific details, like the amount and schedule of payments, must be clearly outlined in the judgment. If the person responsible for paying doesn't have enough insurance, they'll need to provide a guarantee that they can make the payments. Payments can only be changed if the person awarded the money dies. If the payer consistently fails to make payments, they could be held in contempt of court and have to pay extra costs. Even if the injured person dies, damages for lost future earnings still have to be paid to people they supported. The law aims to ensure fair and needed compensation through these payments while preventing large sums going where they weren't meant to if someone dies unexpectedly.

(a)CA Civil Procedure Code § 667.7(a) In any action for injury or damages against a provider of health care services, a superior court shall, at the request of either party, enter a judgment ordering that money damages or its equivalent for future damages of the judgment creditor be paid in whole or in part by periodic payments rather than by a lump-sum payment if the award equals or exceeds two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) in future damages. In entering a judgment ordering the payment of future damages by periodic payments, the court shall make a specific finding as to the dollar amount of periodic payments which will compensate the judgment creditor for such future damages. As a condition to authorizing periodic payments of future damages, the court shall require the judgment debtor who is not adequately insured to post security adequate to assure full payment of such damages awarded by the judgment. Upon termination of periodic payments of future damages, the court shall order the return of this security, or so much as remains, to the judgment debtor.
(b)Copy CA Civil Procedure Code § 667.7(b)
(1)Copy CA Civil Procedure Code § 667.7(b)(1) The judgment ordering the payment of future damages by periodic payments shall specify the recipient or recipients of the payments, the dollar amount of the payments, the interval between payments, and the number of payments or the period of time over which payments shall be made. Such payments shall only be subject to modification in the event of the death of the judgment creditor.
(2)CA Civil Procedure Code § 667.7(b)(2) In the event that the court finds that the judgment debtor has exhibited a continuing pattern of failing to make the payments, as specified in paragraph (1), the court shall find the judgment debtor in contempt of court and, in addition to the required periodic payments, shall order the judgment debtor to pay the judgment creditor all damages caused by the failure to make such periodic payments, including court costs and attorney’s fees.
(c)CA Civil Procedure Code § 667.7(c) However, money damages awarded for loss of future earnings shall not be reduced or payments terminated by reason of the death of the judgment creditor, but shall be paid to persons to whom the judgment creditor owed a duty of support, as provided by law, immediately prior to their death. In such cases the court which rendered the original judgment, may, upon petition of any party in interest, modify the judgment to award and apportion the unpaid future damages in accordance with this subdivision.
(d)CA Civil Procedure Code § 667.7(d) Following the occurrence or expiration of all obligations specified in the periodic payment judgment, any obligation of the judgment debtor to make further payments shall cease and any security given, pursuant to subdivision (a) shall revert to the judgment debtor.
(e)CA Civil Procedure Code § 667.7(e) As used in this section:
(1)CA Civil Procedure Code § 667.7(e)(1) “Future damages” includes damages for future medical treatment, care or custody, loss of future earnings, loss of bodily function, or future pain and suffering of the judgment creditor.
(2)CA Civil Procedure Code § 667.7(e)(2) “Periodic payments” means the payment of money or delivery of other property to the judgment creditor at regular intervals.
(3)CA Civil Procedure Code § 667.7(e)(3) “Health care provider” means any person licensed or certified pursuant to Division 2 (commencing with Section 500) of the Business and Professions Code, or licensed pursuant to the Osteopathic Initiative Act, or the Chiropractic Initiative Act, or licensed pursuant to Chapter 2.5 (commencing with Section 1440) of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code; and any clinic, health dispensary, or health facility, licensed pursuant to Division 2 (commencing with Section 1200) of the Health and Safety Code. “Health care provider” includes the legal representatives of a health care provider.
(4)CA Civil Procedure Code § 667.7(e)(4) “Professional negligence” means a negligent act or omission to act by a health care provider in the rendering of professional services, which act or omission is the proximate cause of a personal injury or wrongful death, provided that such services are within the scope of services for which the provider is licensed and which are not within any restriction imposed by the licensing agency or licensed hospital.
(f)CA Civil Procedure Code § 667.7(f) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to authorize the entry of judgments in malpractice actions against health care providers which provide for the payment of future damages through periodic payments rather than lump-sum payments. By authorizing periodic payment judgments, it is the further intent of the Legislature that the courts will utilize such judgments to provide compensation sufficient to meet the needs of an injured plaintiff and those persons who are dependent on the plaintiff for whatever period is necessary while eliminating the potential windfall from a lump-sum recovery which was intended to provide for the care of an injured plaintiff over an extended period who then dies shortly after the judgment is paid, leaving the balance of the judgment award to persons and purposes for which it was not intended. It is also the intent of the Legislature that all elements of the periodic payment program be specified with certainty in the judgment ordering such payments and that the judgment not be subject to modification at some future time which might alter the specifications of the original judgment.

Section § 668

Explanation
The clerk at the superior court has to maintain a 'judgment book' where court judgments are recorded, unless another rule from Section 668.5 applies.
Except as provided in Section 668.5, the clerk of the superior court, must keep, with the records of the court, a book called the “judgment book,” in which judgments must be entered.

Section § 668.5

Explanation

In some counties, if the court clerk stores individual judgments in the case files and records them using microfilm, a register of actions, or an electronic system before filing them, they don't need to put them in a separate judgment book. The date the judgment is filed is also considered the official entry date.

In those counties where the clerk of the court places individual judgments in the file of actions and either a microfilm copy of the individual judgment is made, or the judgment is entered in the register of actions, or into the court’s electronic data-processing system, prior to placement of the judgment in the file of actions, the clerk shall not be required to enter judgments in a judgment book, and the date of filing the judgment with the clerk shall constitute the date of its entry.

Section § 669

Explanation
If someone involved in a court case dies after the trial is over but before the judge makes a decision, the court is still allowed to give the judgment.
If a party dies after trial and submission of the case to a judge sitting without a jury for decision or after a verdict upon any issue of fact, and before judgment, the court may nevertheless render judgment thereon.

Section § 670

Explanation

This law explains what papers need to be included in a "judgment roll" for cases in superior courts. If a defendant doesn't respond to a lawsuit, the court needs documents like the summons, proof of service, and a copy of the judgment. For cases with more activity, like if a defendant challenged but lost, the court includes documents like all pleadings, jury verdicts, or court decisions. If some defendants don’t respond while others do, the court needs specific documentation for each type of defendant, especially if there were special services like publication involved.

In superior courts the following papers, without being attached together, shall constitute the judgment roll:
(a)CA Civil Procedure Code § 670(a) In case the complaint is not answered by any defendant, the summons, with the affidavit or proof of service; the complaint; the request for entry of default with a memorandum indorsed thereon that the default of the defendant in not answering was entered, and a copy of the judgment; if defendant has appeared by demurrer, and the demurrer has been overruled, then notice of the overruling thereof served on defendant’s attorney, together with proof of the service; and in case the service so made is by publication, the affidavit for publication of summons, and the order directing the publication of summons.
(b)CA Civil Procedure Code § 670(b) In all other cases, the pleadings, all orders striking out any pleading in whole or in part, a copy of the verdict of the jury, the statement of decision of the court, or finding of the referee, and a copy of any order made on demurrer, or relating to a change of parties, and a copy of the judgment; if there are two or more defendants in the action, and any one of them has allowed judgment to pass against him or her by default, the summons, with proof of its service, on the defendant, and if the service on the defaulting defendant be by publication, then the affidavit for publication, and the order directing the publication of the summons.

Section § 673

Explanation

This law explains how someone who is assigned the rights to a court judgment can officially record that assignment. To do this, they need to file an acknowledgment with the court, which includes specific details like the case number, judgment dates, and the names and addresses of the people involved. The acknowledgment has to be made in a formal way, similar to how property deeds are handled, and it must be signed by the original creditor or previous assignee. If someone signs on behalf of the original creditor, they must provide proof of their authority. Alternatively, the assignee can file other legal documents proving the assignment.

(a)CA Civil Procedure Code § 673(a) An assignee of a right represented by a judgment may become an assignee of record by filing with the clerk of the court which entered the judgment an acknowledgment of assignment of judgment.
(b)CA Civil Procedure Code § 673(b) An acknowledgment of assignment of judgment shall contain all of the following:
(1)CA Civil Procedure Code § 673(b)(1) The title of the court where the judgment is entered and the cause and number of the action.
(2)CA Civil Procedure Code § 673(b)(2) The date of entry of the judgment and of any renewals of the judgment and where entered in the records of the court.
(3)CA Civil Procedure Code § 673(b)(3) The name and address of the judgment creditor and name and last known address of the judgment debtor.
(4)CA Civil Procedure Code § 673(b)(4) A statement describing the right represented by the judgment that is assigned to the assignee.
(5)CA Civil Procedure Code § 673(b)(5) The name and address of the assignee.
(c)CA Civil Procedure Code § 673(c) The acknowledgment of assignment of judgment shall be:
(1)CA Civil Procedure Code § 673(c)(1) Made in the manner of an acknowledgment of a conveyance of real property.
(2)CA Civil Procedure Code § 673(c)(2) Executed and acknowledged by the judgment creditor or by the prior assignee of record if there is one.
(d)Copy CA Civil Procedure Code § 673(d)
(1)Copy CA Civil Procedure Code § 673(d)(1) If an acknowledgment of assignment of judgment purports to be executed or acknowledged by an authorized agent of the judgment creditor or an authorized agent of a prior assignee of record, then documentation sufficient to evidence that authorization shall be filed together with the acknowledgment of assignment of judgment.
(2)CA Civil Procedure Code § 673(d)(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), an assignee of a right represented by a judgment may also become an assignee of record by filing with the clerk of the court that entered judgment a court order or other documentation that evidences assignment of judgment by operation of law.

Section § 674

Explanation

This section explains how to create and amend an 'abstract of judgment,' which is a summary of a court decision that orders someone to pay money. It lists what details should be included, like the court's name, judgment amount, and information about the person who owes money. If certain details, like social security or driver's license numbers, are missing, an 'Amendment to Abstract of Judgment' can be made to add them. This amendment doesn't change the original priority of the judgment unless someone else bought or leased the property without knowing about the judgment. When including additional names the debtor might use, an affidavit of identity must be approved by the court before certifying the judgment. If this abstract wrongly creates a lien on property not owned by the debtor, there are remedies to address that.

(a)CA Civil Procedure Code § 674(a) Except as otherwise provided in Section 4506 of the Family Code, an abstract of a judgment or decree requiring the payment of money shall be certified by the clerk of the court where the judgment or decree was entered and shall contain all of the following:
(1)CA Civil Procedure Code § 674(a)(1) The title of the court where the judgment or decree is entered and cause and number of the action.
(2)CA Civil Procedure Code § 674(a)(2) The date of entry of the judgment or decree and of any renewals of the judgment or decree and where entered in the records of the court.
(3)CA Civil Procedure Code § 674(a)(3) The name and last known address of the judgment debtor and the address at which the summons was either personally served or mailed to the judgment debtor or the judgment debtor’s attorney of record.
(4)CA Civil Procedure Code § 674(a)(4) The name and address of the judgment creditor.
(5)CA Civil Procedure Code § 674(a)(5) The amount of the judgment or decree as entered or as last renewed.
(6)CA Civil Procedure Code § 674(a)(6) The last four digits of the social security number and driver’s license number of the judgment debtor if they are known to the judgment creditor. If either or both of those sets of numbers are not known to the judgment creditor, that fact shall be indicated on the abstract of judgment.
(7)CA Civil Procedure Code § 674(a)(7) Whether a stay of enforcement has been ordered by the court and, if so, the date the stay ends.
(8)CA Civil Procedure Code § 674(a)(8) The date of issuance of the abstract.
(b)CA Civil Procedure Code § 674(b) An abstract of judgment, recorded after January 1, 1979, that does not list the social security number and driver’s license number of the judgment debtor, or either of them, as required by subdivision (a) or by Section 4506 of the Family Code, may be amended by the recording of a document entitled “Amendment to Abstract of Judgment.” The Amendment to Abstract of Judgment shall contain all of the information required by this section or by Section 4506 of the Family Code, and shall set forth the date of recording and the book and page location in the records of the county recorder of the original abstract of judgment.
A recorded Amendment to Abstract of Judgment shall have priority as of the date of recordation of the original abstract of judgment, except as to any purchaser, encumbrancer, or lessee who obtained their interest after the recordation of the original abstract of judgment but prior to the recordation of the Amendment to Abstract of Judgment without actual notice of the original abstract of judgment. The purchaser, encumbrancer, or lessee without actual notice may assert as a defense against enforcement of the abstract of judgment the failure to comply with this section or Section 4506 of the Family Code regarding the contents of the original abstract of judgment notwithstanding the subsequent recordation of an Amendment to Abstract of Judgment. With respect to an abstract of judgment recorded between January 1, 1979, and July 10, 1985, the defense against enforcement for failure to comply with this section or Section 4506 of the Family Code may not be asserted by the holder of another abstract of judgment or involuntary lien, recorded without actual notice of the prior abstract, unless refusal to allow the defense would result in prejudice and substantial injury as used in Section 475. The recordation of an Amendment to Abstract of Judgment does not extend or otherwise alter the computation of time as provided in Section 697.310.
(c)Copy CA Civil Procedure Code § 674(c)
(1)Copy CA Civil Procedure Code § 674(c)(1) The abstract of judgment shall be certified in the name of the judgment debtor as listed on the judgment and may also include the additional name or names by which the judgment debtor is known as set forth in the affidavit of identity, as defined in Section 680.135, filed by the judgment creditor with the application for issuance of the abstract of judgment. Prior to the clerk of the court certifying an abstract of judgment containing any additional name or names by which the judgment debtor is known that are not listed on the judgment, the court shall approve the affidavit of identity. If the court determines, without a hearing or a notice, that the affidavit of identity states sufficient facts upon which the judgment creditor has identified the additional names of the judgment debtor, the court shall authorize the certification of the abstract of judgment with the additional name or names.
(2)CA Civil Procedure Code § 674(c)(2) The remedies provided in Section 697.410 apply to a recorded abstract of a money judgment based upon an affidavit of identity that appears to create a judgment lien on real property of a person who is not the judgment debtor.