Of the Place of Trial, Reclassification, and Coordination of Civil ActionsPlace of Trial

Section § 392

Explanation

This law says that if you're dealing with a legal case about real estate, the right court for the trial is usually in the county where the real property is located. This includes cases about recovering real property, deciding on someone's rights to such property, injuries to it, or foreclosing liens or mortgages. If it's about an unlawful detainer—like trying to evict someone—the trial should be as close to the property as possible. The court can set rules about which location is best for these cases.

(a)CA Civil Procedure Code § 392(a) Subject to the power of the court to transfer actions and proceedings as provided in this title, the superior court in the county where the real property that is the subject of the action, or some part thereof, is situated, is the proper court for the trial of the following actions:
(1)CA Civil Procedure Code § 392(a)(1) For the recovery of real property, or of an estate or interest therein, or for the determination in any form, of that right or interest, and for injuries to real property.
(2)CA Civil Procedure Code § 392(a)(2) For the foreclosure of all liens and mortgages on real property.
(b)CA Civil Procedure Code § 392(b) In the court designated as the proper court in subdivision (a), the proper court location for trial of a proceeding for an unlawful detainer, as defined in Section 1161, is the location where the court tries that type of proceeding that is nearest or most accessible to where the real property that is the subject of the action, or some part thereof, is situated. Otherwise any location of the superior court designated as the proper court in subdivision (a) is a proper court location for the trial. The court may specify by local rule the nearest or most accessible court location where the court tries that type of case.
real property recovery of real property determine property rights ...

Section § 393

Explanation

This law explains where certain types of legal cases should be tried within California. If you're suing to recover a penalty or fine set by law, the case should generally be heard in the county where the issue began. However, if the offense happened on a body of water like a lake or river that touches multiple counties, the case can be tried in any of those counties. For cases against public officials or those acting under their orders, the proper trial location is where the alleged wrongful act took place.

Subject to the power of the court to transfer actions and proceedings as provided in this title, the county in which the cause, or some part of the cause, arose, is the proper county for the trial of the following actions:
(a)CA Civil Procedure Code § 393(a) For the recovery of a penalty or forfeiture imposed by statute, except, that when it is imposed for an offense committed on a lake, river, or other stream of water, situated in two or more counties, the action may be tried in any county bordering on the lake, river, or stream, and opposite to the place where the offense was committed.
(b)CA Civil Procedure Code § 393(b) Against a public officer or person especially appointed to execute the duties of a public officer, for an act done by the officer or person in virtue of the office, or against a person who, by the officer’s command or in the officer’s aid, does anything touching the duties of the officer.
trial location venue penalty recovery ...

Section § 394

Explanation

This law explains where legal cases involving counties, cities, or local agencies should be tried. Generally, these cases can be tried in their home area unless one of these entities is suing, in which case it can be moved elsewhere. However, if a case involves injury due to negligence by a city, county, or local agency, it should be tried where the injury happened. The parties can agree on a different location if they wish. If the case is moved, expenses linked to this move can be charged to the party requesting transfer. Importantly, 'local agency' in this context refers to various local government bodies but excludes state agencies.

(a)CA Civil Procedure Code § 394(a) An action or proceeding against a county, or city and county, a city, or local agency, may be tried in the county, or city and county, or the county in which the city or local agency is situated, unless the action or proceeding is brought by a county, or city and county, a city, or local agency, in which case it may be tried in any county, or city and county, not a party thereto and in which the city or local agency is not situated. Except for actions initiated by the local child support agency pursuant to Section 17400, 17402, 17404, or 17416 of the Family Code, any action or proceeding brought by a county, city and county, city, or local agency within a certain county, or city and county, against a resident of another county, city and county, or city, or a corporation doing business in the latter, shall be, on motion of either party, transferred for trial to a county, or city and county, other than the plaintiff, if the plaintiff is a county, or city and county, and other than that in which the plaintiff is situated, if the plaintiff is a city, or a local agency, and other than that in which the defendant resides, or is doing business, or is situated. Whenever an action or proceeding is brought against a county, city and county, city, or local agency, in any county, or city and county, other than the defendant, if the defendant is a county, or city and county, or, if the defendant is a city, or local agency, other than that in which the defendant is situated, the action or proceeding must be, on motion of that defendant, transferred for trial to a county, or city and county, other than that in which the plaintiff, or any of the plaintiffs, resides, or is doing business, or is situated, and other than the plaintiff county, or city and county, or county in which that plaintiff city or local agency is situated, and other than the defendant county, or city and county, or county in which the defendant city or local agency is situated; provided, however, that any action or proceeding against the city, county, city and county, or local agency for injury occurring within the city, county, or city and county, or within the county in which the local agency is situated, to person or property or person and property caused by the negligence or alleged negligence of the city, county, city and county, local agency, or its agents or employees, shall be tried in that county, or city and county, or if a city is a defendant, in the city or in the county in which the city is situated, or if a local agency is a defendant, in the county in which the local agency is situated. In that action or proceeding, the parties thereto may, by stipulation in writing, or made in open court, and entered in the minutes, agree upon any county, or city and county, for the place of trial thereof. When the action or proceeding is one in which a jury is not of right, or in case a jury is waived, then in lieu of transferring the cause, the court in the original county may request the chairperson of the Judicial Council to assign a disinterested judge from a neutral county to hear that cause and all proceedings in connection therewith. When the action or proceeding is transferred to another county for trial, a witness required to respond to a subpoena for a hearing within the original county shall be compelled to attend hearings in the county to which the cause is transferred. If the demand for transfer is made by one party and the opposing party does not consent thereto, the additional costs of the nonconsenting party occasioned by the transfer of the cause, including living and traveling expenses of the nonconsenting party and material witnesses, found by the court to be material, and called by the nonconsenting party, not to exceed five dollars ($5) per day each in excess of witness fees and mileage otherwise allowed by law, shall be assessed by the court hearing the cause against the party requesting the transfer. To the extent of that excess, those costs shall be awarded to the nonconsenting party regardless of the outcome of the trial. This section shall apply to actions or proceedings now pending or hereafter brought.
(b)CA Civil Procedure Code § 394(b) For the purposes of this section, “local agency” shall mean any governmental district, board, or agency, or any other local governmental body or corporation, but shall not include the State of California or any of its agencies, departments, commissions, or boards.
county lawsuits city lawsuits local agency lawsuits ...

Section § 395

Explanation

This section explains which county's superior court is the right place to hold a trial in different situations. Generally, a case should be tried in the county where the defendant lives. For personal injuries or wrongful death, it can be tried where the injury happened or where the defendant lives. For divorce or separation, the court should be where either person has lived for the last three months. Child support cases should be tried where the child lives. If a defendant agreed to do something in a specific county, the trial should be there unless a contract states otherwise. There are also specific rules for cases involving consumer goods, services, or loans, usually focusing on where the buyer or lessee signed the contract or lives. You can't waive this rule, which means these locations must be considered for the case.

(a)CA Civil Procedure Code § 395(a) Except as otherwise provided by law and subject to the power of the court to transfer actions or proceedings as provided in this title, the superior court in the county where the defendants or some of them reside at the commencement of the action is the proper court for the trial of the action. If the action is for injury to person or personal property or for death from wrongful act or negligence, the superior court in either the county where the injury occurs or the injury causing death occurs or the county where the defendants, or some of them reside at the commencement of the action, is a proper court for the trial of the action. In a proceeding for dissolution of marriage, the superior court in the county where either the petitioner or respondent has been a resident for three months next preceding the commencement of the proceeding is the proper court for the trial of the proceeding. In a proceeding for nullity of marriage or legal separation of the parties, the superior court in the county where either the petitioner or the respondent resides at the commencement of the proceeding is the proper court for the trial of the proceeding. In a proceeding to enforce an obligation of support under Section 3900 of the Family Code, the superior court in the county where the child resides is the proper court for the trial of the action. In a proceeding to establish and enforce a foreign judgment or court order for the support of a minor child, the superior court in the county where the child resides is the proper court for the trial of the action. Subject to subdivision (b), if a defendant has contracted to perform an obligation in a particular county, the superior court in the county where the obligation is to be performed, where the contract in fact was entered into, or where the defendant or any defendant resides at the commencement of the action is a proper court for the trial of an action founded on that obligation, and the county where the obligation is incurred is the county where it is to be performed, unless there is a special contract in writing to the contrary. If none of the defendants reside in the state or if they reside in the state and the county where they reside is unknown to the plaintiff, the action may be tried in the superior court in any county that the plaintiff may designate in his or her complaint, and, if the defendant is about to depart from the state, the action may be tried in the superior court in any county where either of the parties reside or service is made. If any person is improperly joined as a defendant or has been made a defendant solely for the purpose of having the action tried in the superior court in the county where he or she resides, his or her residence shall not be considered in determining the proper place for the trial of the action.
(b)CA Civil Procedure Code § 395(b) Subject to the power of the court to transfer actions or proceedings as provided in this title, in an action arising from an offer or provision of goods, services, loans or extensions of credit intended primarily for personal, family or household use, other than an obligation described in Section 1812.10 or Section 2984.4 of the Civil Code, or an action arising from a transaction consummated as a proximate result of either an unsolicited telephone call made by a seller engaged in the business of consummating transactions of that kind or a telephone call or electronic transmission made by the buyer or lessee in response to a solicitation by the seller, the superior court in the county where the buyer or lessee in fact signed the contract, where the buyer or lessee resided at the time the contract was entered into, or where the buyer or lessee resides at the commencement of the action is the proper court for the trial of the action. In the superior court designated in this subdivision as the proper court, the proper court location for trial of a case is the location where the court tries that type of case that is nearest or most accessible to where the buyer or lessee resides, where the buyer or lessee in fact signed the contract, where the buyer or lessee resided at the time the contract was entered into, or where the buyer or lessee resides at the commencement of the action. Otherwise, any location of the superior court designated as the proper court in this subdivision is a proper court location for the trial. The court may specify by local rule the nearest or most accessible court location where the court tries that type of case.
(c)CA Civil Procedure Code § 395(c) Any provision of an obligation described in subdivision (b) waiving that subdivision is void and unenforceable.
venue rules superior court personal injury venue ...

Section § 395.1

Explanation

If someone is sued while managing an estate, like an executor or guardian, the trial should happen in the county where the estate is handled unless there's a special rule for trustees.

Except as otherwise provided in Section 17005 of the Probate Code pertaining to trustees, when a defendant is sued in an official or representative capacity as executor, administrator, guardian, conservator, or trustee on a claim for the payment of money or for the recovery of personal property, the county which has jurisdiction of the estate which the defendant represents shall be the proper county for the trial of the action.
executor guardian conservator ...

Section § 395.2

Explanation

This law says that if a non-profit or unincorporated group has officially registered a principal office in California, lawsuits involving them should be handled in the same county as if they were a corporation. Their officially listed main office determines the right county for legal cases.

If an unincorporated association has filed a statement with the Secretary of State pursuant to statute, designating its principal office in this state, the proper county for the trial of an action against the unincorporated association is the same as it would be if the unincorporated association were a corporation and, for the purpose of determining the proper county, the principal place of business of the unincorporated association shall be deemed to be the principal office in this state listed in the statement.
unincorporated association principal office Secretary of State ...

Section § 395.5

Explanation

If you want to sue a corporation or an organization in California, you can do so in the county where the contract was made, where it is supposed to be carried out, where a problem or breach happened, or where the main office of the business is located. However, the court can decide to move the trial location if needed, just like in other cases.

A corporation or association may be sued in the county where the contract is made or is to be performed, or where the obligation or liability arises, or the breach occurs; or in the county where the principal place of business of such corporation is situated, subject to the power of the court to change the place of trial as in other cases.
corporation lawsuit venue sue corporation location venue of trial ...

Section § 396

Explanation

If you accidentally file an appeal or petition with the wrong court in California, it won't be thrown out just because it was filed in the wrong place. If the superior court can't handle the case, they'll move it to either the court of appeal or the Supreme Court, whichever is appropriate. This transfer will come with any fair terms about costs, as if the case had been filed correctly from the start.

(a)CA Civil Procedure Code § 396(a) No appeal or petition filed in the superior court shall be dismissed solely because the appeal or petition was not filed in the proper state court.
(b)CA Civil Procedure Code § 396(b) If the superior court lacks jurisdiction of an appeal or petition, and a court of appeal or the Supreme Court would have jurisdiction, the appeal or petition shall be transferred to the court having jurisdiction upon terms as to costs or otherwise as may be just, and proceeded with as if regularly filed in the court having jurisdiction.
appeal petition superior court ...

Section § 396

Explanation

This legal section deals with where a case should be filed and how it should be moved if it's in the wrong place. If you're filing a case like an eviction or certain Civil Code sections, you need to show that you're in the right court by including a verified statement or affidavit with your complaint. If it's not the right court, it can be moved either by the court's decision or if the defendant asks for it unless the defendant agrees to handle the case there. If the case is moved, you might need to re-notify the defendant, and the countdown for responding starts over from that notification. You can also ask to move a case within the same court, and how you do this depends on local rules.

In a case that is subject to Sections 1812.10 and 2984.4 of the Civil Code, or subdivision (b) of Section 395 of the Code of Civil Procedure, or in an action or proceeding for an unlawful detainer as defined in Section 1161 of the Code of Civil Procedure:
(a)CA Civil Procedure Code § 396(a) The plaintiff shall state facts in the complaint, verified by the plaintiff’s oath, or the oath of the plaintiff’s attorney, or in an affidavit of the plaintiff or of the plaintiff’s attorney filed with the complaint, showing that the action has been commenced in the proper superior court and the proper court location for the trial of the action or proceeding, and showing that the action is subject to the provisions of Sections 1812.10 and 2984.4 of the Civil Code or subdivision (b) of Section 395 of the Code of Civil Procedure, or is an action for an unlawful detainer. When the affidavit is filed with the complaint, a copy thereof shall be served with the summons. Except as provided in this section, if the complaint or affidavit is not filed pursuant to this subdivision, no further proceedings may occur in the action or proceeding, except to dismiss the action or proceeding without prejudice. However, the court may, on terms that are just, permit the affidavit to be filed after the filing of the complaint, and a copy of the affidavit shall be served on the defendant and the time to answer or otherwise plead shall date from that service.
(b)CA Civil Procedure Code § 396(b) If it appears from the complaint or affidavit, or otherwise, that the superior court or court location where the action or proceeding is commenced is not the proper court or court location for the trial, the court where the action or proceeding is commenced, or a judge thereof, shall, whenever that fact appears, transfer it to the proper court or court location, on its own motion, or on motion of the defendant, unless the defendant consents in writing, or in open court (consent in open court being entered in the minutes of the court), to the keeping of the action or proceeding in the court or court location where commenced. If that consent is given, the action or proceeding may continue in the court or court location where commenced. Notwithstanding Section 1801.1 and subdivision (f) of Section 2983.7 of the Civil Code, that consent may be given by a defendant who is represented by counsel at the time the consent is given, and if an action or proceeding is subject to subdivision (b) of Section 395 or is for an unlawful detainer, that consent may only be given by a defendant who is represented by counsel at the time the consent is given.
(c)CA Civil Procedure Code § 396(c) In any case where the transfer of the action or proceeding is ordered under subdivision (a) or (b), if summons is served prior to the filing of the action or proceeding in the superior court or court location to which it is transferred, as to any defendant, so served, who has not appeared in the action or proceeding, the time to answer or otherwise plead shall date from service upon that defendant of written notice of the filing.
(d)CA Civil Procedure Code § 396(d) If it appears from the complaint or affidavit of the plaintiff that the superior court and court location where the action or proceeding is commenced are a proper court and court location for the trial thereof, all proper proceedings may be had, and the action or proceeding may be tried in that court at that location.
(e)CA Civil Procedure Code § 396(e) A motion for a transfer of the action or proceeding to a different superior court may be made as in other cases, within the time, upon the grounds, and in the manner provided in this title, and if upon that motion it appears that the action or proceeding is not pending in the proper court, or should for other cause be transferred, the action or proceeding shall be ordered transferred as provided in this title.
If any action or proceeding is ordered transferred to another court as provided in this section, proceedings shall be had, and the costs and fees shall be paid, as provided in Sections 398 and 399.
(f)CA Civil Procedure Code § 396(f) If a motion is made for transfer of an action or proceeding to a different court location within the same superior court as provided in this section, proceedings shall be had as provided by local rules of the superior court.
proper court location transfer of action unlawful detainer ...

Section § 396

Explanation

This section explains the rules for transferring a legal case to another court if it wasn't started in the right place. If a defendant thinks the case is in the wrong court, they can ask to move it before responding to the complaint. The judge will decide if the transfer is appropriate. They might also award attorney fees to the winning side of the transfer motion, considering if the other side acted reasonably. For family law cases, the court can handle certain urgent matters like spousal or child support, before deciding on a transfer. If a request to transfer is denied, the defendant gets more time to respond to the case.

(a)CA Civil Procedure Code § 396(a) Except as otherwise provided in Section 396a, if an action or proceeding is commenced in a court having jurisdiction of the subject matter thereof, other than the court designated as the proper court for the trial thereof, under this title, the action may, notwithstanding, be tried in the court where commenced, unless the defendant, at the time he or she answers, demurs, or moves to strike, or, at his or her option, without answering, demurring, or moving to strike and within the time otherwise allowed to respond to the complaint, files with the clerk, a notice of motion for an order transferring the action or proceeding to the proper court, together with proof of service, upon the adverse party, of a copy of those papers. Upon the hearing of the motion the court shall, if it appears that the action or proceeding was not commenced in the proper court, order the action or proceeding transferred to the proper court.
(b)CA Civil Procedure Code § 396(b) In its discretion, the court may order the payment to the prevailing party of reasonable expenses and attorney’s fees incurred in making or resisting the motion to transfer whether or not that party is otherwise entitled to recover his or her costs of action. In determining whether that order for expenses and fees shall be made, the court shall take into consideration (1) whether an offer to stipulate to change of venue was reasonably made and rejected, and (2) whether the motion or selection of venue was made in good faith given the facts and law the party making the motion or selecting the venue knew or should have known. As between the party and his or her attorney, those expenses and fees shall be the personal liability of the attorney not chargeable to the party. Sanctions shall not be imposed pursuant to this subdivision except on notice contained in a party’s papers, or on the court’s own noticed motion, and after opportunity to be heard.
(c)CA Civil Procedure Code § 396(c) The court in a proceeding for dissolution of marriage or legal separation or under the Uniform Parentage Act (Part 3 (commencing with Section 7600) of Division 12 of the Family Code) may, prior to the determination of the motion to transfer, consider and determine motions for allowance of temporary spousal support, support of children, and counsel fees and costs, and motions to determine custody of and visitation with children, and may make all necessary and proper orders in connection therewith.
(d)CA Civil Procedure Code § 396(d) In any case, if an answer is filed, the court may consider opposition to the motion to transfer, if any, and may retain the action in the county where commenced if it appears that the convenience of the witnesses or the ends of justice will thereby be promoted.
(e)CA Civil Procedure Code § 396(e) If the motion to transfer is denied, the court shall allow the defendant time to move to strike, demur, or otherwise plead if the defendant has not previously filed a response.
court transfer action proceeded wrong venue ...

Section § 397

Explanation

This law allows a court to change the location of a trial for several reasons. It can be changed if the chosen court isn't the right one, if there's a concern about getting a fair trial, or if moving it benefits witnesses and justice. A change is also possible if there's no qualified judge or in some divorce cases to better serve justice. Even when considering moving a trial, the court can handle temporary orders related to spousal and child support or legal fees.

The court may, on motion, change the place of trial in the following cases:
(a)CA Civil Procedure Code § 397(a) When the court designated in the complaint is not the proper court.
(b)CA Civil Procedure Code § 397(b) When there is reason to believe that an impartial trial cannot be had therein.
(c)CA Civil Procedure Code § 397(c) When the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change.
(d)CA Civil Procedure Code § 397(d) When from any cause there is no judge of the court qualified to act.
(e)CA Civil Procedure Code § 397(e) When a proceeding for dissolution of marriage has been filed in the county in which the petitioner has been a resident for three months next preceding the commencement of the proceeding, and the respondent at the time of the commencement of the proceeding is a resident of another county in this state, to the county of the respondent’s residence when the ends of justice would be promoted by the change. If a motion to change the place of trial is made pursuant to this paragraph, the court may, prior to the determination of such motion, consider and determine motions for allowance of temporary spousal support, support of children, temporary restraining orders, attorneys’ fees, and costs, and make all necessary and proper orders in connection therewith.
change of trial location impartial trial witness convenience ...

Section § 397.5

Explanation

This law deals with transferring family law cases when both parties have moved out of the county where the original order was made. It allows the court to transfer the proceedings to the county where either the petitioner or respondent now lives if it’s fair and more convenient. In cases that involve local child support agencies and are part of certain sections of the Family Code, the court can transfer cases that don’t involve the agency, but any motions related to child support must be directed to the correct court handling those matters.

In any proceeding under the Family Code where it appears that both petitioner and respondent have moved from the county rendering the order, the court may, when the ends of justice and the convenience of the parties would be promoted by the change, order that the proceedings be transferred to the county of residence of either party. In any proceeding in which there is a concurrent action or proceeding under Division 17 (commencing with Section 17000) of the Family Code involving the local child support agency, the court may transfer venue under this section for any action or proceeding not subject to Division 17 (commencing with Section 17000) of the Family Code, but shall redirect any motion pursuant to this section to the court of competent jurisdiction under Section 4251 of the Family Code for change of venue in those actions and proceedings subject to Division 17 (commencing with Section 17000) of the Family Code. The decision on any motion redirected pursuant to the preceding sentence shall apply only to the action or proceeding under Division 17 (commencing with Section 17000) of the Family Code and shall be at the sole discretion of the court of competent jurisdiction hearing the action or proceeding pursuant to Section 4251 of the Family Code.
family law case transfer petitioner and respondent relocation court order transfer ...

Section § 398

Explanation

This law explains what happens when a court case needs to be moved to a different court. If the court orders a transfer because of reasons listed in another law, and everyone involved agrees, the case will go to a court that can handle it. If they can't agree, it goes to the closest suitable court. If a case starts in the wrong court and needs to be moved, the parties can agree on the right court. If not, the defendant can choose a proper court in the same county. If there isn't a suitable court there, the defendant chooses one elsewhere. If the defendant doesn't choose, or the court decides to move it on its own, the court will pick the right place. The defendant can make this choice in a motion to the court or in court when the transfer is ordered.

(a)CA Civil Procedure Code § 398(a) If a court orders the transfer of an action or proceeding for a cause specified in subdivisions (b), (c), and (d) of Section 397, the action or proceeding shall be transferred to a court having jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action upon agreement of the parties by stipulation in writing, or in open court and entered in the minutes or docket. If the parties do not so agree, the action or proceeding shall be transferred to the nearest or most accessible court where the like objection or cause for making the order does not exist.
(b)CA Civil Procedure Code § 398(b) If an action or proceeding is commenced in a court other than one designated as a proper court for the trial thereof by the provisions of this title, and the same is ordered transferred for that reason, the action or proceeding shall be transferred to a proper court upon agreement of the parties by stipulation in writing, or in open court and entered in the minutes or docket. If the parties do not so agree, the action or proceeding shall be transferred to a proper court in the county in which the action or proceeding was commenced which the defendant may designate or, if there is no proper court in that county, to a proper court, in a proper county, designated by the defendant. If the defendant does not designate the court as herein provided, or if the court orders the transfer of an action on its own motion as provided in this title, the action or proceeding shall be transferred to the proper court as determined by the court in which the action or proceeding is pending.
(c)CA Civil Procedure Code § 398(c) The designation of the court by the defendant as provided for in subdivision (b), may be made in the notice of motion for change of venue or in open court and entered in the minutes or docket at the time the order for transfer is made.
court transfer action transfer proper court ...

Section § 399

Explanation

This law lays out the procedures for transferring a court case from one court to another. When a case is moved, the clerk sends all the documents to the new court, after specific conditions and payments are met. This includes paying any transfer costs and fees. If the moving party fails to pay, another interested party can pay and recover these costs if they win the case. The court can dismiss the case if the costs aren't paid in time. The new court will treat the case as if it started there originally and can request new or additional paperwork to ensure everything is clear. For family law cases, the original court can still make urgent orders to protect people or property until the new court takes over. The timeline for transferring and assuming jurisdiction in family law cases is to be set by the Judicial Council.

(a)CA Civil Procedure Code § 399(a) If an order is made transferring an action or proceeding under any provision of this title, the clerk shall, after expiration of the time within which a petition for writ of mandate could have been filed pursuant to Section 400, or if a writ petition is filed after judgment denying the writ becomes final, and upon payment of the costs and fees, transmit the pleadings and papers of the action or proceeding, or, if the pleadings are oral, a transcript of the pleadings, to the clerk of the court to which the action or proceeding is transferred. If the transfer is sought on any ground specified in subdivision (b), (c), (d), or (e) of Section 397 or in Section 397.5, the costs and fees of the transfer, and of filing the papers in the court to which the transfer is ordered, shall be paid at the time the notice of motion is filed by the party making the motion for the transfer. If the transfer is sought solely, or is ordered, because the action or proceeding was commenced in a court other than that designated as proper by this title, those costs and fees, including any expenses and attorney’s fees awarded to the defendant pursuant to Section 396b, shall be paid by the plaintiff before the transfer is made. If the defendant has paid those costs and fees at the time of filing a notice of motion, those costs and fees shall be repaid to the defendant, upon the making of the transfer order. If those costs and fees have not been paid by the plaintiff within five days after service of notice of the transfer order, any other party interested in the action or proceeding, whether named in the complaint as a party or not, may pay those costs and fees, and the clerk shall transmit the papers and pleadings of the action or proceeding as if those costs and fees had been originally paid by the plaintiff, and those costs and fees shall be a proper item of costs of the party paying them, recoverable by that party if that party prevails in the action. Otherwise, those costs and fees shall be offset against and deducted from the amount, if any, awarded to the plaintiff if the plaintiff prevails against that party in the action. The cause of action shall not be further prosecuted in any court until those costs and fees are paid. If those costs and fees are not paid within 30 days after service of notice of the transfer order, if a copy of a petition for writ of mandate pursuant to Section 400 is filed in the trial court, or if an appeal is taken pursuant to Section 904.2, then, within 30 days after notice of finality of the order of transfer, the court on a duly noticed motion by any party may dismiss the action without prejudice to the cause on the condition that no other action on the cause may be commenced in another court before satisfaction of the court’s order for costs and fees. If a petition for writ of mandate or appeal does not result in a stay of proceedings, the time for payment of those costs and fees shall be 60 days after service of the notice of the order.
(b)CA Civil Procedure Code § 399(b) At the time of transmittal of the papers and pleadings, the clerk shall mail notice to all parties who have appeared in the action or special proceeding, stating the date on which the transmittal occurred. Promptly upon receipt of the papers and pleadings, the clerk of the court to which the action or proceeding is transferred shall mail notice to all parties who have appeared in the action or special proceeding, stating the date of the filing of the case and number assigned to the case in the court.
(c)CA Civil Procedure Code § 399(c) The court to which an action or proceeding is transferred under this title shall have and exercise over the action or proceeding the like jurisdiction as if it had been originally commenced in that court, all prior proceedings being saved, and the court may require amendment of the pleadings, the filing and service of amended, additional, or supplemental pleadings, and the giving of notice, as may be necessary for the proper presentation and determination of the action or proceeding in the court.
(d)CA Civil Procedure Code § 399(d) Notwithstanding subdivision (c), the court transferring jurisdiction of a family law action or proceeding pursuant to Section 397, 397.5, or 398 shall, if another court has not assumed jurisdiction over the action or proceeding, retain jurisdiction to make orders designed to prevent:
(1)CA Civil Procedure Code § 399(d)(1) Immediate danger or irreparable harm to a party or to the children involved in the matter.
(2)CA Civil Procedure Code § 399(d)(2) Immediate loss or damage to property subject to disposition in the matter.
(e)CA Civil Procedure Code § 399(e) By January 1, 2019, the Judicial Council shall, by rule of court, establish:
(1)CA Civil Procedure Code § 399(e)(1) The timeframe for a court to transfer jurisdiction over a family law action or proceeding.
(2)CA Civil Procedure Code § 399(e)(2) The timeframe for a court to assume jurisdiction over a family law action or proceeding.
court case transfer clerk responsibilities transfer costs and fees ...

Section § 400

Explanation

If a superior court decides to change or not change the place where a trial will be held, the party who disagrees has 20 days to ask a higher court to review the decision. They can request the trial to be held in the correct location. The superior court can give them an extra 10 days if there's a good reason. Once this request is made to the higher court, a copy needs to be sent to the trial court. The higher court might pause the trial until they make a final decision, and once that decision is made, they must inform the trial court immediately.

When an order is made by the superior court granting or denying a motion to change the place of trial, the party aggrieved by the order may, within 20 days after service of a written notice of the order, petition the court of appeal for the district in which the court granting or denying the motion is situated for a writ of mandate requiring trial of the case in the proper court. The superior court may, for good cause, and prior to the expiration of the initial 20-day period, extend the time for one additional period not to exceed 10 days. The petitioner shall file a copy of the petition in the trial court immediately after the petition is filed in the court of appeal. The court of appeal may stay all proceedings in the case, pending judgment on the petition becoming final. The clerk of the court of appeal shall file with the clerk of the trial court, a copy of any final order or final judgment immediately after the order or judgment becomes final.
superior court order motion to change trial place writ of mandate ...

Section § 401

Explanation

This law allows legal actions or cases involving the State of California, or its various departments and agencies, to be started and held in any city where the Attorney General has an office, not just in Sacramento. If the State starts a case and it's supposed to be in Sacramento, defendants can request for it to be moved to the Attorney General's office nearest to where they are located.

(1)CA Civil Procedure Code § 401(1) Whenever it is provided by any law of this State that an action or proceeding against the State or a department, institution, board, commission, bureau, officer or other agency thereof shall or may be commenced in, tried in, or removed to the County of Sacramento, the same may be commenced and tried in any city or city and county of this State in which the Attorney General has an office.
(2)CA Civil Procedure Code § 401(2) Whenever it is provided by any law of this State that the State or a department, institution, board, commission, bureau, officer or other agency thereof shall or may commence an action or proceeding in the County of Sacramento, the same, on motion of the defendants or some of them, shall be removed for trial to the county or city and county in which the Attorney General has an office nearest to the county in which the defendants or some of them reside or have their principal office in this State.
Attorney General office legal actions location State of California cases ...

Section § 402

Explanation

This section allows superior courts to decide where certain cases should be filed or heard based on local rules. If a case is filed at the wrong location, the court won't dismiss it, but can move it to the right place. The court can't reject a case just because it's in the wrong spot. Additionally, the presiding judge can organize court work as per statewide rules.

(a)CA Civil Procedure Code § 402(a) Except as otherwise provided by law:
(1)CA Civil Procedure Code § 402(a)(1) A superior court may specify by local rule the locations where certain types of actions or proceedings are to be filed.
(2)CA Civil Procedure Code § 402(a)(2) A superior court may specify by local rule the locations where certain types of actions or proceedings are to be heard or tried.
(3)CA Civil Procedure Code § 402(a)(3) A superior court may not dismiss a case, and the clerk may not reject a case for filing, because it is filed, or a person seeks to file it, in a court location other than the location specified by local rule. However, the court may transfer the case on its own motion to the proper court location.
(b)CA Civil Procedure Code § 402(b) A superior court may transfer an action or proceeding filed in one location to another location of the superior court. This section does not affect the authority of the presiding judge to apportion the business of the court as provided by the California Rules of Court.
superior court locations local rules case filing ...

Section § 403

Explanation

If you have a case with common issues to another case, a judge can move it to their court to handle them together. To do this, you need to show certain conditions are met, try to get everyone involved to agree, and notify all parties and courts. Others can oppose the move. Once transferred, cases might be combined for trial. The Judicial Council can make rules to ensure smooth transfers and avoid conflicts between courts.

A judge may, on motion, transfer an action or actions from another court to that judge’s court for coordination with an action involving a common question of fact or law within the meaning of Section 404. The motion shall be supported by a declaration stating facts showing that the actions meet the standards specified in Section 404.1, are not complex as defined by the Judicial Council and that the moving party has made a good faith effort to obtain agreement to the transfer from all parties to each action. Notice of the motion shall be served on all parties to each action and on each court in which an action is pending. Any party to that action may file papers opposing the motion within the time permitted by rule of the Judicial Council. The court to which a case is transferred may order the cases consolidated for trial pursuant to Section 1048 without any further motion or hearing.
The Judicial Council may adopt rules to implement this section, including rules prescribing procedures for preventing duplicative or conflicting transfer orders issued by different courts.
case transfer coordination common question of fact ...