Bonds and UndertakingsGeneral Provisions
Section § 995.210
This law says that if a legal rule requires either a bond or an undertaking, you can usually use one in place of the other as long as it meets the same conditions. So, if a bond is needed, you can use an undertaking instead, and vice versa, making them interchangeable depending on what is needed.
Section § 995.220
This law says that when a bond is required in legal actions, such as for restraining orders, appointing receivers, or pausing judgment enforcement, certain government entities and officials are not obliged to provide that bond. These include the State of California, any of its agencies, counties, cities, districts, as well as the United States and any federal bodies. These entities still have all the legal rights and advantages as if they had posted the bond.
Section § 995.230
If someone is supposed to receive protection from a bond in a legal case, they can agree in writing to accept a bond that is smaller than what the law normally requires, or they can choose to give up the bond entirely.
Section § 995.240
This California law allows a court to waive the requirement for a bond if a person can't afford it due to financial hardship. The court has the flexibility to issue necessary orders as though the bond was given. While deciding, the court considers factors like the type of case, the nature of the people or entities affected, and the potential consequences if the bond isn't required.
Section § 995.250
This law says that if a party in a court case is allowed to claim costs, those costs can include the premium payments for certain bonds. Specifically, it covers premiums on bonds the party pays if a statute requires the bond for the case, or if it's connected to the case, unless a court finds the bond wasn't needed.
Section § 995.260
If a bond has been officially recorded, a certified copy of that record can be used as evidence in any legal case just like the original bond. You don't need any additional proof to use it.