Suspension, Revocation, And Reinstatement Of Certificates - Respiratory Therapy - Business & Professions - CA

Section § 3750

This law allows the board to deny, suspend, revoke, or put conditions on a respiratory care practitioner's license for various reasons. These include false advertising, license fraud, hiring unlicensed personnel, crime convictions related to their duties, impersonation during exams, negligence, legal violations, and aiding violations or unlawful practice. It also covers dishonest acts related to their work, falsifying records or prescriptions, issues with licenses in other areas, not following infection control guidelines, incompetence, and providing false information during investigations.

The board may order the denial, suspension, or revocation of, or the imposition of probationary conditions upon, a license issued under this chapter, for any of the following causes:

(a) Advertising in violation of Section 651 or Section 17500.

(b) Fraud in the procurement of any license under this chapter.

(c) Employing an unlicensed person who presents herself or himself as a licensed respiratory care practitioner when the employer knew or should have known the person was not licensed.

(d) Conviction of a crime that substantially relates to the qualifications, functions, or duties of a respiratory care practitioner. The record of conviction or a certified copy thereof shall be conclusive evidence of the conviction.

(e) Impersonating or acting as a proxy for an applicant in any examination given under this chapter.

(f) Negligence in his or her practice as a respiratory care practitioner.

(g) Conviction of a violation of this chapter or of Division 2 (commencing with Section 500), or violating, or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violation of, or conspiring to violate this chapter or Division 2 (commencing with Section 500).

(h) The aiding or abetting of any person to violate this chapter or any regulations duly adopted under this chapter.

(i) The aiding or abetting of any person to engage in the unlawful practice of respiratory care.

(j) The commission of any fraudulent, dishonest, or corrupt act that is substantially related to the qualifications, functions, or duties of a respiratory care practitioner.

(k) Falsifying, or making grossly incorrect, grossly inconsistent, or unintelligible entries in any patient, hospital, or other record.

(l) Changing the prescription of a physician and surgeon, or falsifying verbal or written orders for treatment or a diagnostic regime received, whether or not that action resulted in actual patient harm.

(m) Denial, suspension, or revocation of any license to practice by another agency, state, or territory of the United States for any act or omission that would constitute grounds for the denial, suspension, or revocation of a license in this state.

(n)

(1) Except for good cause, the knowing failure to protect patients by failing to follow infection control guidelines of the board, thereby risking transmission of bloodborne infectious diseases from licensee to patient, from patient to patient, and from patient to licensee. In administering this subdivision, the board shall consider referencing the standards, regulations, and guidelines of the State Department of Public Health developed pursuant to Section 1250.11 of the Health and Safety Code and the standards, regulations, and guidelines pursuant to the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 (Part 1 (commencing with Section 6300) of Division 5 of the Labor Code) for preventing the transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, and other bloodborne pathogens in health care settings. As necessary, the board shall consult with the California Medical Board, the Board of Podiatric Medicine, the Dental Board of California, the Board of Registered Nursing, and the Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians, to encourage appropriate consistency in the implementation of this subdivision.

(2) The board shall seek to ensure that licensees are informed of the responsibility of licensees and others to follow infection control guidelines, and of the most recent scientifically recognized safeguards for minimizing the risk of transmission of bloodborne infectious diseases.

(o) Incompetence in his or her practice as a respiratory care practitioner.

(p) A pattern of substandard care or negligence in his or her practice as a respiratory care practitioner, or in any capacity as a health care worker, consultant, supervisor, manager or health facility owner, or as a party responsible for the care of another.

(q) Providing false statements or information on any form provided by the board or to any person representing the board during an investigation, probation monitoring compliance check, or any other enforcement-related action when the individual knew or should have known the statements or information was false.

respiratory care practitioner license suspension fraudulent license procurement

Section § 3750.5

This California law allows the board to take action against any applicant or current licenseholder in healthcare fields if they: (a) improperly handle controlled or dangerous drugs; (b) use drugs or alcohol in a dangerous way that affects their work; (c) work while under the influence of alcohol; (d) are convicted of a crime related to drug or alcohol use; (e) are legally committed to a facility because of addiction; or (f) falsify records related to drug handling. Essentially, if anyone in a licensed healthcare profession engages in these activities, the board can deny, suspend, or revoke their license, place them on probation, or take similar actions.

In addition to any other grounds specified in this chapter, the board may deny, suspend, place on probation, or revoke the license of any applicant or licenseholder who has done any of the following:

(a) Obtained, possessed, used, or administered to himself or herself in violation of law, or furnished or administered to another, any controlled substances as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code, or any dangerous drug as defined in Article 2 (commencing with Section 4015) of Chapter 9, except as directed by a licensed physician and surgeon, dentist, podiatrist, or other authorized health care provider, or illegally possessed any associated paraphernalia.

(b) Used any controlled substance as defined in Division 10 (commencing with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code, or any dangerous drug as defined in Article 2 (commencing with Section 4015) of Chapter 9 of this code, or alcoholic beverages, to an extent or in a manner dangerous or injurious to himself or herself, or to others, or that impaired his or her ability to conduct with safety the practice authorized by his or her license.

(c) Applied for employment or worked in any health care profession or environment while under the influence of alcohol.

(d) Been convicted of a criminal offense involving the consumption or self-administration of any of the substances described in subdivisions (a) and (b), or the possession of, or falsification of a record pertaining to, the substances described in subdivision (a), in which event the record of the conviction is conclusive evidence thereof.

(e) Been committed or confined by a court of competent jurisdiction for intemperate use of or addiction to the use of any of the substances described in subdivisions (a), (b), and (c), in which event the court order of commitment or confinement is prima facie evidence of that commitment or confinement.

(f) Falsified, or made grossly incorrect, grossly inconsistent, or unintelligible entries in any hospital, patient, or other record pertaining to the substances described in subdivision (a).

controlled substances dangerous drugs license revocation

Section § 3750.51

This law section outlines the time frames within which accusations against a licensee must be filed. Generally, the time limit is three years from when the board discovers the issue or seven years from when the issue happened, whichever is earlier. However, this doesn't apply if the accusation involves fraud or misrepresentation in obtaining the license. Time limits can be paused if required reports are late or if a minor is involved, delaying until they reach adulthood. For sexual misconduct cases, the complaint must be filed within three years of discovery or ten years from the incident, whichever comes first. Periods may also be paused if crucial evidence is being held up by a criminal investigation.

(a) Except as provided in subdivisions (b), (c), and (e), any accusation filed against a licensee pursuant to Section 11503 of the Government Code shall be filed within three years from the date the board discovers the alleged act or omission that is the basis for disciplinary action, or within seven years from the date the alleged act or omission that is the basis for disciplinary action occurred, whichever occurs first.

(b) An accusation filed against a licensee pursuant to Section 11503 of the Government Code alleging the procurement of a license by fraud or misrepresentation is not subject to the limitations set forth in subdivision (a).

(c) The limitation provided for by subdivision (a) shall be tolled for the length of time required to obtain compliance when a report required to be filed by the licensee or registrant with the board pursuant to Article 11 (commencing with Section 800) of Chapter 1 is not filed in a timely fashion.

(d) If an alleged act or omission involves a minor, the seven-year limitations period provided for by subdivision (a) and the 10-year limitations period provided for by subdivision (e) shall be tolled until the minor reaches the age of majority.

(e) An accusation filed against a licensee pursuant to Section 11503 of the Government Code alleging sexual misconduct shall be filed within three years after the board discovers the act or omission alleged as the ground for disciplinary action, or within 10 years after the act or omission alleged as the ground for disciplinary action occurs, whichever occurs first.

(f) The limitations period provided by subdivision (a) shall be tolled during any period if material evidence necessary for prosecuting or determining whether a disciplinary action would be appropriate is unavailable to the board due to an ongoing criminal investigation.

time limits for accusations fraud or misrepresentation sexual misconduct

Section § 3750.6

If you have a pocket license or work permit issued by the board, you must show the original document when asked. Copies or facsimiles are not acceptable.

Upon request, every holder of a pocket license shall produce for inspection the original pocket license issued by the board. A facsimile of the license is not sufficient for that purpose.

Upon request, every applicant issued a work permit shall produce for inspection the original permit issued by the board. A facsimile of the work permit is not sufficient for that purpose.

pocket license original document work permit

Section § 3751

If your professional license in California has been revoked, surrendered, or put on hold, you can ask the board to reinstate it, change the terms, or end probation, but only if you've paid all fees and kept probation payments up to date. If your license was revoked for three or more years, you must also pass the current education and exam requirements. You can file a petition after certain time periods depending on the situation. Your petition must include two recommendations from licensed professionals. The board can decide based on written arguments or might hear oral arguments if requested. They will consider your activities since the penalty, including efforts to improve, your professional abilities, and overall reputation. The board can approve, deny, or impose conditions on reinstatement. They won't consider your petition if you're currently facing criminal charges or probation issues. A processing fee is required, and if approved, additional fees apply. Certain legal sections remain unaffected by this rule.

(a) A person whose license has been revoked, surrendered, or suspended, or placed on probation, may petition the board for reinstatement, modification, or termination of probation, provided the person has paid all outstanding fees, fines, and cost recovery in full, and monthly probation monitoring payments are current.

(b) A person petitioning for reinstatement of his or her license that has been revoked or surrendered for three or more years shall also meet the current education and examination requirements required for initial licensure.

(c) A petition may be filed only after a period of time has elapsed, but not less than the following minimum periods from the effective date of the decision ordering that disciplinary action:

(1) At least three years for reinstatement of a license that has been revoked or surrendered.

(2) At least two years for early termination of probation of three years or more.

(3) At least one year for modification of a condition, or reinstatement of a license revoked or surrendered for mental or physical illness, or termination of probation of less than three years.

(d) The petition shall state any facts as may be required by the board. The petition shall be accompanied by at least two verified recommendations from licensed health care practitioners who have personal knowledge of the professional activities of the petitioner since the disciplinary penalty was imposed. The board may accept or reject the petition.

(e) Written or oral argument may be provided by the petitioner or, at the request of the board, by the Attorney General. Unless the board or the petitioner requests the presentation of oral argument, the petition shall be considered and voted upon by mail. If the petitioner or the board requests the opportunity for oral argument, the petition shall be heard by the board or the board may assign the petition to an administrative law judge.

(f) Consideration shall be given to all activities of the petitioner since the disciplinary action was taken, the offense for which the petitioner was disciplined, the petitioner’s activities during the time the license was in good standing, and the petitioner’s rehabilitative efforts, general reputation for truth, and professional ability.

(g) The board may deny the petition for reinstatement, reinstate the license without terms and conditions, require an examination for the reinstatement, restoration, or modification of probation, or reinstate the license with terms and conditions as it deems necessary. Where a petition is heard by an administrative law judge, the administrative law judge shall render a proposed decision to the board denying the petition for reinstatement, reinstating the license without terms and conditions, requiring an examination for the reinstatement, or reinstating the license with terms and conditions as he or she deems necessary. The board may take any action with respect to the proposed decision and petition as it deems appropriate.

(h) No petition shall be considered under either of the following circumstances:

(1) If the petitioner is under sentence for any criminal offense including any period during which the petitioner is on court-imposed probation or parole.

(2) If an accusation or a petition to revoke probation is pending against the person.

(i) The board may deny without a hearing or argument any petition filed pursuant to this section within a period of three years from the effective date of the prior decision.

(j) Petitions for reinstatement shall include a processing fee equal to fees charged pursuant to subdivisions (a) and (h) of Section 3775. In addition, petitions for reinstatement that are granted shall include a fee equal to the fee charged pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 3775, before the license may be reinstated.

(k) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to alter Sections 822 and 823.

license reinstatement revoked license probation termination

Section § 3751.5

If someone's application for a license has been denied for a specific reason, they have to wait three years before they can apply again.

Notwithstanding Section 489, a person whose application for licensure has been denied for cause may reapply to the board for licensure only after a period of three years has elapsed from the date of the denial.

license application denial reapplication period three-year waiting period

Section § 3752

If a respiratory care practitioner is found guilty or agrees to a 'nolo contendere' plea (meaning they don't contest the charge) for a crime related to their job duties or qualifications, it's treated as a conviction. In such cases, the board must suspend or revoke their license or may refuse to issue one, even if the person later tries to change their guilty plea or dismiss the conviction through certain legal processes.

A plea or verdict of guilty or a conviction following a plea of nolo contendere made to a charge of any offense which substantially relates to the qualifications, functions, or duties of a respiratory care practitioner is deemed to be a conviction within the meaning of this article. The board shall order the license suspended or revoked, or may decline to issue a license, when the time for appeal has elapsed, or the judgment of conviction has been affirmed on appeal or when an order granting probation is made suspending the imposition of sentence, irrespective of a subsequent order under Section 1203.4 of the Penal Code allowing the person to withdraw his or her plea of guilty and to enter a plea of not guilty, or setting aside the verdict of guilty, or dismissing the accusation, information, or indictment.

respiratory care practitioner nolo contendere license suspension

Section § 3752.5

This law states that if a respiratory care practitioner is involved in a crime that causes or attempts to cause bodily injury, it will be considered related to their job qualifications and duties.

For purposes of Division 1.5 (commencing with Section 475), and this chapter, a crime involving bodily injury or attempted bodily injury shall be considered a crime substantially related to the qualifications, functions, or duties of a respiratory care practitioner.

respiratory care practitioner bodily injury crime

Section § 3752.6

This law section states that any crime related to sexual misconduct by a respiratory care practitioner is considered directly connected to their professional qualifications and duties, even if the misconduct doesn't involve a patient.

For purposes of Division 1.5 (commencing with Section 475), and this chapter, a crime involving sexual misconduct or attempted sexual misconduct, whether or not with a patient, shall be considered a crime substantially related to the qualifications, functions, or duties of a respiratory care practitioner.

sexual misconduct respiratory care practitioner crime involving misconduct

Section § 3752.7

If a decision finds that a respiratory care practitioner has had sexual contact with a patient or committed a sex offense, their license must be revoked immediately. This revocation cannot be delayed. A patient is no longer considered under their care when their respiratory procedures are officially ended.

Notwithstanding Section 3750, any proposed decision or decision issued under this chapter in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 11500) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, that contains any finding of fact that the licensee or registrant engaged in any act of sexual contact, as defined in Section 729, with a patient, or has committed an act or been convicted of a sex offense as defined in Section 44010 of the Education Code, shall contain an order of revocation. The revocation shall not be stayed by the administrative law judge. For purposes of this section, the patient shall no longer be considered a patient of the respiratory care practitioner when the order for respiratory procedures is terminated, discontinued, or not renewed by the prescribing physician and surgeon.

respiratory care practitioner license revocation sexual contact

Section § 3753

This law section states that if a professional license is denied, suspended, or taken away, the process must follow the rules outlined in the Administrative Procedure Act, which is a set of guidelines for how government departments handle such cases.

The procedure in all matters and proceedings relating to the denial, suspension, or revocation of licenses under this chapter shall be governed by the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 11500) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code).

denial of licenses suspension of licenses revocation of licenses

Section § 3753.1

This law says that if someone is on probation as a result of a disciplinary decision, they might have to pay for the costs related to monitoring their probation. If they don't pay these costs, their license won't be renewed or reinstated once their probation is over.

(a) An administrative disciplinary decision imposing terms of probation may include, among other things, a requirement that the licensee-probationer pay the monetary costs associated with monitoring the probation.

(b) The board shall not renew or reinstate the license of any licensee who has failed to pay all of the costs ordered under this section once a licensee has served his or her term of probation.

administrative disciplinary decision probation costs licensee-probationer

Section § 3753.5

This section deals with situations where a professional board in California orders someone who has broken the law or violated board rules to pay for the costs of investigating and prosecuting their case. The costs are determined by an administrative law judge and cannot be increased by the board unless they change the proposed decision. If the person doesn't pay, the board can enforce the payment in court, and they won't renew or reinstate the person's license until the costs are paid. However, the board might allow someone facing financial hardship to renew their license temporarily if they agree to pay within a year.

(a) In any order issued in resolution of a disciplinary proceeding before the board, the board or the administrative law judge may direct any practitioner or applicant found to have committed a violation or violations of law or any term and condition of board probation to pay to the board a sum not to exceed the costs of the investigation and prosecution of the case. A certified copy of the actual costs, or a good faith estimate of costs where actual costs are not available, signed by the official custodian of the record or his or her designated representative shall be prima facie evidence of the actual costs of the investigation and prosecution of the case.

(b) The costs shall be assessed by the administrative law judge and shall not be increased by the board; however, the costs may be imposed or increased by the board if it does not adopt the proposed decision of the case.

Where an order for recovery of costs is made and timely payment is not made as directed in the board’s decision the board may enforce the order for repayment in any appropriate court. This right of enforcement shall be in addition to any other rights the board may have as to any practitioner directed to pay costs.

(c) In any action for recovery of costs, proof of the board’s decision shall be conclusive proof of the validity of the order of payment and the terms for payment.

(d)

(1) The board shall not renew or reinstate the license of any licensee who has failed to pay all of the costs ordered under this section.

(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the board may, in its discretion, conditionally renew, for a maximum of one year, the license of any licensee who demonstrates financial hardship, through documentation satisfactory to the board, and who enters into a formal agreement with the board to reimburse the board within that one-year period for those unpaid costs.

disciplinary proceeding costs investigation and prosecution costs renew license conditions

Section § 3753.7

This section defines what counts as 'costs of prosecution.' It includes fees for attorneys, fees for expert witnesses, and other related administrative and filing fees.

For purposes of this chapter, costs of prosecution shall include attorney general or other prosecuting attorney fees, expert witness fees, and other administrative, filing, and service fees.

costs of prosecution attorney general fees prosecuting attorney fees

Section § 3754

This section explains that the board has the authority to refuse a license application, grant a license with specific terms, suspend or revoke a license, or place a licensee on probation. These actions occur after a formal hearing, which follows the procedure outlined in another section.

The board may deny an application for, or issue with terms and conditions, or suspend or revoke, or impose probationary conditions upon, a license in any decision made after a hearing, as provided in Section 3753.

license denial license suspension probationary conditions

Section § 3754.5

This law says that if anyone gets their professional license through dishonest methods like fraud or lying, or if their license was given to them by accident, the board is required to start proceedings to address this issue.

The board shall initiate action against any licensee who obtains a license by fraud or misrepresentation. The board shall take action against any licensee whose license was issued by mistake.

license fraud misrepresentation initiate action

Section § 3754.8

Even if a respiratory care license becomes inactive due to expiration, cancellation, suspension, or if it's voluntarily given up, the board still has the power to investigate and potentially take disciplinary action against the licensee. This includes suspending or revoking the license through legal proceedings if necessary.

The expiration, cancellation, forfeiture, or suspension of a license, practice privilege, or other authority to practice respiratory care by operation of law or by order or decision of the board or a court of law, the placement of a license on a retired status, or the voluntary surrender of the license by a licensee shall not deprive the board of jurisdiction to commence or proceed with any investigation of, or action or disciplinary proceeding against, the licensee, or to render a decision to suspend or revoke the license.

respiratory care license investigation disciplinary action

Section § 3755

This law allows the board to take action against respiratory care practitioners for unprofessional conduct. This includes repeatedly administering inappropriate or unsafe respiratory treatments, any acts of patient abuse, or violating certain provisions. If someone repeatedly engages in such conduct, they can face misdemeanor charges, with possible fines or jail time up to six months.

(a) The board may take action against a respiratory care practitioner who is charged with unprofessional conduct in administering, or attempting to administer, direct or indirect respiratory care in any care setting. Unprofessional conduct includes, but is not limited to, the following:

(1) Repeated acts of clearly administering directly or indirectly inappropriate respiratory care procedures, protocols, therapeutic regimens, or diagnostic testing or monitoring techniques.

(2) Any act of administering unsafe respiratory care procedures, protocols, therapeutic regimens, or diagnostic testing or monitoring techniques.

(3) Any act of abuse towards a patient.

(4) A violation of any provision of Section 3750.

(b) The board may determine unprofessional conduct involving any and all aspects of respiratory care performed by anyone licensed as a respiratory care practitioner.

(c) Any person who engages in repeated acts of unprofessional conduct shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by imprisonment for a term not to exceed six months, or by both that fine and imprisonment.

unprofessional conduct respiratory care patient abuse

Section § 3756

This law allows the board overseeing respiratory care practitioners to require one of its practitioners to take a professional competency test if there's a good reason to believe they can't or won't provide safe care. Causes for concern include negligence, incompetence, or not following care protocols. If the board decides there's a valid concern, they'll issue an order for testing the practitioner's skills. If the practitioner fails the test or doesn't take it, they could lose their license. However, if they pass, the board can't accuse them of being incompetent based solely on the original issues. Records of the investigation are confidential if no further action happens, and all records are destroyed if no further questions arise within five years.

(a) A respiratory care practitioner who provides respiratory care may be ordered to undergo a professional competency examination approved by the board if, after investigation and review by one or more respiratory care practitioner consultants of the board, there is reasonable cause to believe that the person providing respiratory care is unable or unwilling to practice respiratory care with reasonable skill and patient safety. Reasonable cause shall be determined by the board and may include, but shall not be limited to, the following:

(1) Negligence.

(2) A pattern of inappropriate direct or indirect administration of respiratory care protocols, procedures, therapeutic regimens, or diagnostic testing of monitoring techniques.

(3) An act of incompetence or negligence causing death or serious bodily injury.

(4) A pattern of substandard care.

(5) Violation of any provision of this chapter.

(b) The matter shall be presented by the board’s executive officer or designee by way of a written petition detailing the reasonable cause. The petition shall contain all conclusions and facts upon which the presumption of reasonable cause is based. A copy of the petition shall be served on the person who shall have 45 days after receipt of the copy of the petition to file written opposition to the petition. Service of the petition and any order shall be in accordance with the methods of service authorized by subdivision (c) of Section 11505 of the Government Code.

(c) The board shall review the petition and any written opposition from the person who has charges brought against him or her, or the board may hold a hearing in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act to determine if reasonable cause exists, as specified in subdivision (a). The person who has charges brought against him or her shall have the right to be represented at that hearing by a person of his or her choice. If the board is satisfied that reasonable cause exists that is considered by the board as unprofessional conduct, the board shall issue an order compelling the person who has charges brought against him or her to undergo an examination of professional competency, as measured by community standards. For purposes of this section, “community standards” means the statewide standards of the community of licensees. Failure to comply with the order duly served the person charged shall constitute unprofessional conduct for purposes of disciplinary proceedings and failure to pass the examination shall result in denial, suspension, or revocation of the license, or registration which shall be determined by the board in its discretion.

(d) If the board proceeds pursuant to Sections 3755 and 3756 and the person charged passes the professional competency examination administered, the board shall be precluded from filing an accusation of incompetency based solely on the circumstances giving rise to the reasonable cause for the examination.

(e) If the board determines there is insufficient cause to file an accusation based on the examination results, then all agency records of the proceedings, including the petition and order for the examination, investigative reports, if any, reports of staff or the board’s consultants, and the reports of the examiners, shall be kept confidential and shall not be subject to discovery or subpoena.

(f) If no further proceedings are conducted to determine the person’s fitness to practice during a period of five years from the date of the petition under Section 3756, then the agency shall purge and destroy all records pertaining to the proceeding.

respiratory care practitioner professional competency examination reasonable cause

Section § 3757

The board has the authority to deny a license or work authorization for a respiratory care practitioner if there's concern that the applicant can't practice safely because of mental health issues or substance abuse. If this happens, the procedures in Article 12.5 are followed.

The board may refuse to issue a license or an authorization to work as a “respiratory care practitioner applicant” whenever it appears that the applicant may be unable to practice his or her profession safely due to mental illness or chemical dependency. The procedures set forth in Article 12.5 (commencing with Section 820) of Chapter 1 shall apply to any denial of a license or authorization pursuant to this section.

license denial respiratory care practitioner mental illness

Section § 3758

Employers of respiratory care practitioners in California must report to the Respiratory Care Board if a practitioner is put on leave, resigns, is suspended, or terminated due to serious issues like substance abuse affecting work, illegal sales of drugs, patient harm, record falsification, incompetence, or theft. This also applies to agencies placing practitioners who are no longer welcome due to similar reasons. Confidentiality of the reported information is maintained, and failure to report carries a fine of up to $10,000 per violation.

(a) Any employer of a respiratory care practitioner shall report to the Respiratory Care Board of California any leave, resignation, suspension, or termination for cause of any practitioner in their employ. The reporting required herein shall not act as a waiver of confidentiality of medical records. The information reported or disclosed shall be kept confidential except as provided in subdivision (c) of Section 800, and shall not be subject to discovery in civil cases.

(b) For purposes of the section, “leave, resignation, suspension, or termination for cause” is defined to mean any administrative leave, employee leave, resignation, suspension, or termination from employment for any of the following reasons:

(1) Suspected or actual use of controlled substances or alcohol to such an extent that it impairs the ability to safely practice respiratory care.

(2) Suspected or actual unlawful sale of controlled substances or other prescription items.

(3) Suspected or actual patient neglect, physical harm to a patient, or sexual contact with a patient.

(4) Suspected or actual falsification of medical records.

(5) Suspected or actual gross incompetence or negligence.

(6) Suspected or actual theft from patients, other employees, or the employer.

(c) An owner, director, partner, or manager of a registry or agency that places one or more respiratory care practitioners at any facility to practice respiratory care shall report to the Respiratory Care Board of California pursuant to subdivision (a) if either of the following apply:

(1) The owner, director, partner, or manager is aware that a respiratory care practitioner is no longer employed at the facility they were placed at by the registry or agency for any behavior described in subdivision (b).

(2) The owner, director, partner, or manager is asked to place the practitioner on a “do not call” list or other status indicating the facility does not want that practitioner placed at their facility for any behavior described in subdivision (b).

(d) Failure of an employer to make a report required by this section is punishable by an administrative fine not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per violation.

respiratory care practitioner employer reporting substance abuse

Section § 3758.5

If you hold a license and know someone might be breaking the rules or laws that the board oversees, you must report it to the board in writing and help them with any needed information or assistance.

If a licensee has knowledge that another person may be in violation of, or has violated, any of the statutes or regulations administered by the board, the licensee shall report this information to the board in writing and shall cooperate with the board in furnishing information or assistance as may be required.

licensee obligation reporting violations board regulations

Section § 3758.6

This law requires employers to report to the board the details of a supervisor when an employee in a licensed position is put on leave, resigns, is suspended, or fired for specific reasons. This includes the supervisor's name, license type, number, and job title. If the supervisor is a licensee under the same chapter, the board will check if they followed the rules properly. If the supervisor is from a different health profession, the employer must report them to their respective board. Not reporting these details can lead to a fine of up to $10,000 for each instance.

(a) In addition to the reporting required under Section 3758, an employer shall also report to the board the name, professional licensure type and number, and title of the person supervising the licensee who has been subject to leave, resignation, suspension, or termination for cause, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 3758. If the supervisor is a licensee under this chapter, the board shall investigate whether due care was exercised by that supervisor in accordance with this chapter. If the supervisor is a health professional, licensed by another licensing board under this division, the employer shall report the name of that supervisor and any and all information pertaining to the leave, resignation, suspension, or termination for cause of the person licensed under this chapter to the appropriate licensing board.

(b) The failure of an employer to make a report required by this section is punishable by an administrative fine not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per violation.

employer reporting requirements supervisor investigation leave resignation suspension termination

Section § 3759

This law protects people from being sued for making a report that they are required to file under this chapter. It ensures they won't face civil penalties for fulfilling their reporting duties.

Pursuant to Section 43.8 of the Civil Code, no person shall incur any civil penalty as a result of making any report required by this chapter.

civil penalty protection no penalties for reporting required report

Respiratory Therapy

Respiratory TherapySuspension, Revocation, and Reinstatement of Certificates