Section § 14411

Explanation

If you file a fictitious business name (a name different from your real name) statement, it generally means you have the exclusive right to use that name in your county. This holds true if you're the first to file and you're actually doing business under that name. However, this claim can be challenged, and the responsibility to present evidence shifts to the person challenging it.

The filing of any fictitious business name statement by a person required to file such statement pursuant to Section 17910 shall establish a rebuttable presumption that the registrant has the exclusive right to use as a trade name the fictitious business name, as well as any confusingly similar trade name, in the county in which the statement is filed, if the registrant is the first to file such a statement containing the fictitious business name in that county, and is actually engaged in a trade or business utilizing such fictitious business name or a confusingly similar name in that county.
The rebuttable presumption created by this section shall be one affecting the burden of producing evidence.

Section § 14412

Explanation

This law section indicates that a certain presumption related to fictitious business names is valid until either the business name statement is officially abandoned, expired, or a new statement hasn't been filed by anyone taking over the business name.

The rebuttable presumption created by Section 14411 shall be applicable until the fictitious business name statement is abandoned pursuant to Section 17922, or otherwise expires pursuant to Section 17920, and no new fictitious business name statement has been filed by the registrant, or in the case of any assignment or transfer no original fictitious business name statement has been filed by the assignee or transferee.

Section § 14413

Explanation

This law states that a fictitious business name statement filed after January 1, 1971, is considered to have been filed on July 1, 1971, if it aligns with the requirements from a specific chapter in the 1970 Statutes. For the filing date to be valid, the original certificate must have been first filed under an older section of the Civil Code and must not have expired before being filed under another specific chapter of the Business and Professions Code.

For purposes of Section 14411 a fictitious business name statement filed after January 1, 1971, and deemed filed on July 1, 1971, under Section 8 of Chapter 618 of the 1970 Statutes shall be considered filed at the time a certificate was first filed under Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 2466) of Title 10 of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, as it existed on the effective date of the filing, provided that the certificate had not expired prior to the filing under Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 17900) of Part 3 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code.

Section § 14414

Explanation

This section clarifies that nothing in this chapter mandates or forbids the filing of a fictitious business name statement in any county unless specifically required or prohibited by another law, Section 17910.

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to require or prohibit the filing in any county of any fictitious business name statement if such filing is not required or prohibited by Section 17910.

Section § 14415

Explanation

This law states that when you officially form a company in California, whether it's domestic or foreign, by filing the appropriate documents, you're generally considered to own the rights to your company's name within the state, as well as any similar names that might confuse people. This means if you were the first to claim that name and are actively doing business with it, you're presumed to have the exclusive right to use it. If you're a foreign company with permission to do business here, you're recognized as established from when you first got that permission. This presumption can be challenged, meaning it's not an absolute guarantee but shifts the responsibility to the challenger to prove otherwise.

The filing of articles of incorporation pursuant to Section 200 of the Corporations Code, in the case of a domestic corporation, or the obtaining of a certificate of qualification pursuant to Sections 2105 and 2106 of the Corporations Code, in the case of a foreign corporation, shall establish a rebuttable presumption that the corporation has the exclusive right to use as a trade name, in the state the corporate name set forth in the articles or certificate, as well as any confusingly similar trade name, if the corporation is the first to have filed the articles or obtained the certificate containing the corporate name, and is actually engaged in a trade or business utilizing that corporate name or a confusingly similar name.
If a foreign corporation continues to have authority to transact intrastate business pursuant to Section 2102 of the Corporations Code, the foreign corporation shall be considered to have obtained its certificate of qualification pursuant to law for the purposes of this section on the date it first qualified to transact intrastate business in this state.
The rebuttable presumption created by this section affects the burden of producing evidence.

Section § 14416

Explanation

This section explains how to determine who gets the exclusive right to use a trade name in a county when there's a conflict between a corporation and another business registrant. The one who filed their business name registration first and is actively doing business with that name will generally have the stronger claim to use it. This applies even if the names are confusingly similar, and the first to file has a presumption of exclusive rights over others who filed later.

If, as to the same or a confusingly similar trade name, in a county, there are both a corporation entitled to the rebuttable presumption created by Section 14415 and a registrant entitled to the benefit of the presumption created by Section 14411, whichever has filed the fictitious business name statement, filed the articles of incorporation, or obtained the certificate of qualification first in time, and is actually engaged in a trade or business utilizing such fictitious business name, such corporate name, or a confusingly similar name, shall be entitled to the presumption as against the other, that he has the exclusive right to use such fictitious business name, or such corporate name, or a confusingly similar name, as a trade name in the county where the registrant has filed his fictitious business name statement.

Section § 14417

Explanation

Just because a corporation files its articles of incorporation doesn't mean it can automatically use any corporate name it wants. The name must not infringe on someone else's trademark rights under federal law, state trademark law, the Fictitious Business Name Act, or common law rights. The Secretary of State will inform each new corporation of this rule.

The filing of articles of incorporation pursuant to Section 200 of the Corporations Code shall not of itself authorize the use in this state of a corporate name in violation of the rights of another under the federal Trademark Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1051 et seq.), the Trademark Act (Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 14200) of Division 6), the Fictitious Business Name Act (Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 17900) of Division 7), or the common law, including rights in a trade name. The Secretary of State shall deliver a notice to this effect to each newly organized corporation.

Section § 14418

Explanation

Filing a fictitious business name statement in California doesn't automatically give you the right to use a business name if it infringes on someone else's rights. This includes issues with trademarks, trade names, or rights protected under federal and common law.

The filing of any fictitious business name statement pursuant to Section 17910 does not, of itself, authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another as established under this chapter, the federal law relating to trademarks (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1051 et seq.), or the common law, including rights in a trade name.